Application of TOPSIS Method to Design a Decision Support System in Assessing Teachers Performance

Donny Dharmawan
{"title":"Application of TOPSIS Method to Design a Decision Support System in Assessing Teachers Performance","authors":"Donny Dharmawan","doi":"10.60083/jidt.v6i1.474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this project is to develop a decision support system for evaluating teacher performance based on the TOPSIS approach (a strategy that can be referred to by others based on its resemblance to an ideal solution). The investigator collected data through a variety of methods, including observations, literature reviews, online data searches, and interviewing. In the research, the author developed the system using the RAD (Rapid Application Development) paradigm. The approach is used by the author to compute teacher performance evaluations. Next, before running the code, manually simulate the TOPSIS calculations. The next step is coding, which is done using JavaScript and the PHP programming language. The web server is XAMPP, the database is MySQL, and the system creation framework is the Content Management System (CMS). The black box testing approach was employed by the author in this study. Compared to the prior duration of around one month, the black box testing approach has demonstrated the ability to complete calculations for teacher performance assessments in five minutes. Teachers with a final score above the average are considered to have good performance, while those with a score below the average indicate decreased or weak performance. Proves that from 100 teachers, there are 30 weakest teachers in the 1st criteria, 5 weakest teachers in the 13th criteria, 10 weakest teachers in the 7th criteria, 5 weakest teacher in the 10th criteria, 25 weakest teachers in the 4th criteria, and 10 weakest teachers in the 1st criteria. There are 45 weakest teachers in total, with 10 in the 11th criterion and 5 in the 12th criterion. That way, schools can follow up on each teacher's weak criteria appropriately so that they can improve teacher performance in the school.","PeriodicalId":507682,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.v6i1.474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this project is to develop a decision support system for evaluating teacher performance based on the TOPSIS approach (a strategy that can be referred to by others based on its resemblance to an ideal solution). The investigator collected data through a variety of methods, including observations, literature reviews, online data searches, and interviewing. In the research, the author developed the system using the RAD (Rapid Application Development) paradigm. The approach is used by the author to compute teacher performance evaluations. Next, before running the code, manually simulate the TOPSIS calculations. The next step is coding, which is done using JavaScript and the PHP programming language. The web server is XAMPP, the database is MySQL, and the system creation framework is the Content Management System (CMS). The black box testing approach was employed by the author in this study. Compared to the prior duration of around one month, the black box testing approach has demonstrated the ability to complete calculations for teacher performance assessments in five minutes. Teachers with a final score above the average are considered to have good performance, while those with a score below the average indicate decreased or weak performance. Proves that from 100 teachers, there are 30 weakest teachers in the 1st criteria, 5 weakest teachers in the 13th criteria, 10 weakest teachers in the 7th criteria, 5 weakest teacher in the 10th criteria, 25 weakest teachers in the 4th criteria, and 10 weakest teachers in the 1st criteria. There are 45 weakest teachers in total, with 10 in the 11th criterion and 5 in the 12th criterion. That way, schools can follow up on each teacher's weak criteria appropriately so that they can improve teacher performance in the school.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用 TOPSIS 方法设计评估教师绩效的决策支持系统
本项目的目的是根据 TOPSIS 方法(一种基于与理想解决方案相似性的策略)开发一个用于评估教师绩效的决策支持系统。研究者通过各种方法收集数据,包括观察、文献综述、在线数据搜索和访谈。在研究中,作者使用 RAD(快速应用程序开发)范式开发了系统。作者使用这种方法计算教师的绩效评价。接下来,在运行代码之前,手动模拟 TOPSIS 计算。下一步是编码,使用 JavaScript 和 PHP 编程语言完成。网络服务器是 XAMPP,数据库是 MySQL,系统创建框架是内容管理系统(CMS)。作者在本研究中采用了黑盒测试方法。与以往约一个月的时间相比,黑盒测试方法已证明能够在五分钟内完成教师绩效评估的计算。最终得分高于平均分的教师被认为表现良好,而得分低于平均分的教师则表示表现下降或较弱。证明在 100 名教师中,第 1 项标准中最弱的教师有 30 人,第 13 项标准中最弱的教师有 5 人,第 7 项标准中最弱的教师有 10 人,第 10 项标准中最弱的教师有 5 人,第 4 项标准中最弱的教师有 25 人,第 1 项标准中最弱的教师有 10 人。共有 45 名最薄弱教师,其中第 11 项标准中有 10 名最薄弱教师,第 12 项标准中有 5 名最薄弱教师。这样,学校就可以适当跟进每位教师的薄弱标准,从而提高学校的教师绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Media Analysis: Utilizing Information Technology for Market Intelligence and Branding of Toraja Coffe Products Consumer Preferences on Processed Herbs and Spices Products of SMEs in Sukoharjo Managing Human Resource in the Digital Economy: Balancing Challenges and Opportunities The Disabled Community Empowerment Model with Social Entrepreneurship Approach to Tenoon Business Analysis of The Role of Affective Commitment As an Intervening Variable in The Relationship Between Effective Reward and Organizational Learning in Advertising Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1