FEM modeling requirements for accurate analysis of highly nonlinear shallow tunnels

Felipe Vitali, O. Vitali, Antonio Bobet, T. Celestino
{"title":"FEM modeling requirements for accurate analysis of highly nonlinear shallow tunnels","authors":"Felipe Vitali, O. Vitali, Antonio Bobet, T. Celestino","doi":"10.28927/sr.2024.000923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern tunnel design in urban areas heavily relies on numerical modeling to assess excavation stability and predict ground movement. Recent advancements in soil modeling, hardware, and software have facilitated the development of sophisticated 3D models within tight schedules. Urban tunnels are often shallow and excavated in challenging ground conditions, with proximity to existing structures and infrastructure. Consequently, numerical modeling of such tunnels involves highly nonlinear analyses with complex boundary conditions. Despite the widespread use of numerical modeling in tunnel research and design, there is a lack of publications addressing modeling procedures to ensure accurate and reliable results for highly nonlinear shallow tunnel analyses. This paper investigates the requirements for accurate results for highly nonlinear shallow tunnel analyses. The Finite Element Method (FEM) is employed with different mesh refinements and element types. The study focuses on the hypothetical excavation stability scenario explored by Carranza-Torres et al. (2013). Tunnel stability is assessed using Caquot’s analytical solution based on the lower bound theorem of plasticity, as well as FEM modeling with the strength reduction method. The FEM numerical solution, which approaches the exact solution for the problem, provided a factor of safety slightly larger (2.3%) than Caquot’s lower-bound solution. The results of the FEM modeling indicate that a significantly less refined mesh is required to achieve accurate results for highly nonlinear shallow tunnel analyses when adopting 2nd-order elements (i.e., quadratic interpolation) instead of 1st-order elements (i.e., linear interpolation). This study improves our understanding of FEM modeling requirements and provides practical insights regarding the numerical modeling of highly nonlinear shallow tunnels in urban areas.","PeriodicalId":507352,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Rocks","volume":" 64","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Rocks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28927/sr.2024.000923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern tunnel design in urban areas heavily relies on numerical modeling to assess excavation stability and predict ground movement. Recent advancements in soil modeling, hardware, and software have facilitated the development of sophisticated 3D models within tight schedules. Urban tunnels are often shallow and excavated in challenging ground conditions, with proximity to existing structures and infrastructure. Consequently, numerical modeling of such tunnels involves highly nonlinear analyses with complex boundary conditions. Despite the widespread use of numerical modeling in tunnel research and design, there is a lack of publications addressing modeling procedures to ensure accurate and reliable results for highly nonlinear shallow tunnel analyses. This paper investigates the requirements for accurate results for highly nonlinear shallow tunnel analyses. The Finite Element Method (FEM) is employed with different mesh refinements and element types. The study focuses on the hypothetical excavation stability scenario explored by Carranza-Torres et al. (2013). Tunnel stability is assessed using Caquot’s analytical solution based on the lower bound theorem of plasticity, as well as FEM modeling with the strength reduction method. The FEM numerical solution, which approaches the exact solution for the problem, provided a factor of safety slightly larger (2.3%) than Caquot’s lower-bound solution. The results of the FEM modeling indicate that a significantly less refined mesh is required to achieve accurate results for highly nonlinear shallow tunnel analyses when adopting 2nd-order elements (i.e., quadratic interpolation) instead of 1st-order elements (i.e., linear interpolation). This study improves our understanding of FEM modeling requirements and provides practical insights regarding the numerical modeling of highly nonlinear shallow tunnels in urban areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精确分析高度非线性浅层隧道的有限元建模要求
城市地区的现代隧道设计在很大程度上依赖于数值建模来评估开挖稳定性和预测地面运动。土壤建模、硬件和软件方面的最新进展有助于在紧迫的时间内开发出复杂的三维模型。城市隧道通常较浅,开挖时的地层条件具有挑战性,并靠近现有结构和基础设施。因此,此类隧道的数值建模涉及具有复杂边界条件的高度非线性分析。尽管数值建模在隧道研究和设计中得到了广泛应用,但仍缺乏针对建模程序的出版物,以确保高度非线性浅层隧道分析结果的准确性和可靠性。本文研究了高度非线性浅层隧道分析对精确结果的要求。有限元法(FEM)采用了不同的网格细化和元素类型。研究重点是 Carranza-Torres 等人(2013 年)探讨的假设开挖稳定性情况。隧道稳定性的评估采用了基于塑性下界定理的 Caquot 分析解法,以及采用强度折减方法的有限元建模。有限元数值解法接近问题的精确解法,提供的安全系数(2.3%)略大于 Caquot 的下界解法。有限元建模的结果表明,在采用二阶元素(即二次插值)而不是一阶元素(即线性插值)时,为获得高非线性浅层隧道分析的精确结果,所需的细化网格要少得多。这项研究加深了我们对有限元建模要求的理解,并为城市地区高度非线性浅层隧道的数值建模提供了实用见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-situ and laboratory characterisation of stiff and dense geomaterials for driven pile analysis and design Use of ICT to implement an active learning strategy in soil mechanics courses at undergraduate level Investigating the Martian soil at the InSight landing site The development and evaluation of an educational board game on basic geotechnical soil characterization Influence of industrial effluent treatment ettringite on the compressive and tensile strength and microstructure of soil-cement mixtures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1