The Relative Role of Family Affluence and Social Support on Depression and Selfesteem among Adolescents in Nigeria: a Cross-sectional Study

Q3 Medicine Acta medica academica Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.5644/ama2006-124.421
B. Edet, Emmanuel Essien, F. Eleazu, Roger Abang, Emmanuel Ochijele, Faithful Daniel
{"title":"The Relative Role of Family Affluence and Social Support on Depression and Selfesteem among Adolescents in Nigeria: a Cross-sectional Study","authors":"B. Edet, Emmanuel Essien, F. Eleazu, Roger Abang, Emmanuel Ochijele, Faithful Daniel","doi":"10.5644/ama2006-124.421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. To assess the relative importance of social support and family affluence in depression and self-esteem among ado- lescents in Calabar, Nigeria. \nMethods. This cross-sectional study was conducted among adolescent students in Calabar, Nigeria. Using stratified random sampling, 332 students were selected for participation. The Family Affluence Scale (FAS), Oslo Social Support Scale (OSS), Becks Depression Inventory (BDI) and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Inventory (RSES) were administered. To facilitate comparisons, the sample was divided into four groups: those with low OSS and low FAS scores, those with low OSS and high FAS scores, those with high OSS and low FAS scores, and those with high scores in both OSS and FAS. Groups were com- pared using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of depression and self-esteem. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 21. \nResults. Respondents with low levels of social support, irrespective of family affluence, had significantly higher depression scores and significantly lower self-esteem scores (P< 0.05). In linear regression analyses, social support (95%CI [-1.35,-0.58]) and female gender (95%CI [1.49,5.29]) emerged as predic- tors of depression, while social support (95%CI [0.25,0.64]) and age (95%CI [-0.79,-0.11]) emerged as predictors of self-esteem. Affluence did not predict depression or self-esteem. \nConclusions. Social support is of greater relative importance in depression and self-esteem in our study. In developing nations with lean resources, enhanced social support might buffer against the effect of low socio-economic status on mental health.","PeriodicalId":38313,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica academica","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica academica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the relative importance of social support and family affluence in depression and self-esteem among ado- lescents in Calabar, Nigeria. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted among adolescent students in Calabar, Nigeria. Using stratified random sampling, 332 students were selected for participation. The Family Affluence Scale (FAS), Oslo Social Support Scale (OSS), Becks Depression Inventory (BDI) and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Inventory (RSES) were administered. To facilitate comparisons, the sample was divided into four groups: those with low OSS and low FAS scores, those with low OSS and high FAS scores, those with high OSS and low FAS scores, and those with high scores in both OSS and FAS. Groups were com- pared using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of depression and self-esteem. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 21. Results. Respondents with low levels of social support, irrespective of family affluence, had significantly higher depression scores and significantly lower self-esteem scores (P< 0.05). In linear regression analyses, social support (95%CI [-1.35,-0.58]) and female gender (95%CI [1.49,5.29]) emerged as predic- tors of depression, while social support (95%CI [0.25,0.64]) and age (95%CI [-0.79,-0.11]) emerged as predictors of self-esteem. Affluence did not predict depression or self-esteem. Conclusions. Social support is of greater relative importance in depression and self-esteem in our study. In developing nations with lean resources, enhanced social support might buffer against the effect of low socio-economic status on mental health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭富裕程度和社会支持对尼日利亚青少年抑郁和自尊的相对作用:一项横断面研究
目的评估社会支持和家庭富裕程度对尼日利亚卡拉巴尔青少年抑郁和自尊的相对重要性。方法。这项横断面研究在尼日利亚卡拉巴尔的青少年学生中进行。通过分层随机抽样,共选取了 332 名学生参与研究。研究使用了家庭富裕程度量表 (FAS)、奥斯陆社会支持量表 (OSS)、贝克斯抑郁量表 (BDI) 和罗森伯格自尊量表 (RSES)。为便于比较,样本被分为四组:低奥斯陆社会支持量表和低 FAS 分数组、低奥斯陆社会支持量表和高 FAS 分数组、高奥斯陆社会支持量表和低 FAS 分数组,以及奥斯陆社会支持量表和 FAS 分数均高的组。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对各组进行比较。进行线性回归分析以确定抑郁和自尊的预测因素。所有分析均使用 IBM SPSS 21 版本进行。结果无论家庭富裕与否,社会支持水平低的受访者抑郁得分明显较高,自尊得分明显较低(P< 0.05)。在线性回归分析中,社会支持(95%CI [-1.35,-0.58])和女性性别(95%CI [1.49,5.29])成为抑郁的预测因子,而社会支持(95%CI [0.25,0.64])和年龄(95%CI [-0.79,-0.11])成为自尊的预测因子。富裕程度并不能预测抑郁或自尊。结论在我们的研究中,社会支持对抑郁和自尊的相对重要性更大。在资源匮乏的发展中国家,加强社会支持可能会缓冲低社会经济地位对心理健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica academica
Acta medica academica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inborn Errors of Immunity: New Insights. Resilience in the Face of War: a Collaborative Autoethnography of a Ukrainian Refugee Student's Journey through Europe Striving to Find Oneself. Anatomical Variations of the Vermiform Appendix. Morphometric Analysis of the Greater Palatine Foramina in the Bosnia and Herzegovina Population. HPV-Related Cancers in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Comprehensive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1