Dva notářské instrumenty z roku 1419 k dějinám řeholních kanovníků sv. Augustina v Kladsku. Pramenná edice

Pavel Krafl
{"title":"Dva notářské instrumenty z roku 1419 k dějinám řeholních kanovníků sv. Augustina v Kladsku. Pramenná edice","authors":"Pavel Krafl","doi":"10.14712/2464689x.2023.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 14th century, canon law gained considerable influence. All cases which related to clergy and Church property were dealt with solely by the ecclesiastical courts. During the preparatory phases of court proceedings, public notaries were very important. They were mainly involved in appointing legal representatives and producing verified copies of important documents. The objective of this article is to present two notarial instruments produced by public notaries: Materna, the son of Doctor Martin of Kladsko, and Nicolas, called Naso, the son of Henry of Chojnów. Both instruments were produced in 1419 and relate to the monastery of the Canons Regular of St. Augustine in Kladsko. The documents are kept in the Kladsko parish archive under numbers A 4 b and A 12 i. Attached is a critical edition of both notarial instruments. The first instrument incorporates documents of Wenceslas IV, King of Bohemia, Charles IV, King of Bohemia, and Arnošt of Pardubice, Archbishop of Prague, which show the ownership of properties in the Kladsko region and outside it. The second instrument records the appointment of legal representatives of the convent at the ecclesiastical courts. We do not have any direct evidence of the subject of the monastery’s dispute, but one can assume that it related to long-term disputes with the holders of fiefs in the Kladsko region. These disagreements related to economic immunity (unauthorised attempts to collect royal taxes for the monastery’s properties) and, to a lesser extent, other matters.","PeriodicalId":386369,"journal":{"name":"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689x.2023.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the 14th century, canon law gained considerable influence. All cases which related to clergy and Church property were dealt with solely by the ecclesiastical courts. During the preparatory phases of court proceedings, public notaries were very important. They were mainly involved in appointing legal representatives and producing verified copies of important documents. The objective of this article is to present two notarial instruments produced by public notaries: Materna, the son of Doctor Martin of Kladsko, and Nicolas, called Naso, the son of Henry of Chojnów. Both instruments were produced in 1419 and relate to the monastery of the Canons Regular of St. Augustine in Kladsko. The documents are kept in the Kladsko parish archive under numbers A 4 b and A 12 i. Attached is a critical edition of both notarial instruments. The first instrument incorporates documents of Wenceslas IV, King of Bohemia, Charles IV, King of Bohemia, and Arnošt of Pardubice, Archbishop of Prague, which show the ownership of properties in the Kladsko region and outside it. The second instrument records the appointment of legal representatives of the convent at the ecclesiastical courts. We do not have any direct evidence of the subject of the monastery’s dispute, but one can assume that it related to long-term disputes with the holders of fiefs in the Kladsko region. These disagreements related to economic immunity (unauthorised attempts to collect royal taxes for the monastery’s properties) and, to a lesser extent, other matters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两份 1419 年的公证文书,内容涉及克拉德斯科圣奥古斯丁修道院的历史。来源版本
14 世纪,教会法获得了相当大的影响力。所有与神职人员和教会财产有关的案件都只由教会法庭处理。在法庭诉讼的准备阶段,公证人非常重要。他们主要参与指定法律代表和制作重要文件的核实副本。本文旨在介绍两份由公证人制作的公证文书:这两份文书分别是克拉兹科的马丁医生的儿子马特纳和乔伊努夫的亨利的儿子尼古拉(又名纳索)所作。这两份文书都是 1419 年制作的,与克拉德什科的圣奥古斯丁普通教规修道院有关。这些文件保存在克拉德什科教区档案馆,编号分别为 A 4 b 和 A 12 i。第一份文书包含波希米亚国王温塞斯拉斯四世、波希米亚国王查理四世和布拉格大主教阿尔诺什特-帕尔杜比采的文件,这些文件显示了克拉德斯科地区内外的财产所有权。第二份文书记录了修道院在教会法庭任命法定代表人的情况。我们没有任何关于修道院争端主题的直接证据,但可以推测它与克拉德斯科地区封地所有者之间的长期争端有关。这些纠纷涉及经济豁免权(未经授权试图为修道院的财产征收皇家税),其次还涉及其他事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pojetí výprosy podle ABGB Knížecí spravedlnost. Soudnictví ve Valdštejnově Frýdlantském vévodství Zpráva z konference „Antonín Švehla, Alois Rašín a ti druzí“ Čo pre Slovákov znamenal a v súčasnosti znamená štátny sviatok Slovenského národného povstania? The Protection of Privacy Rights and Professional Secrecy in the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1