Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Prens Sabahattin, Turgut Özal ve Adem-i Merkeziyetçi Yönetim Anlayışına Dair Sosyo-politik Bir İnceleme

H. Ateş
{"title":"Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Prens Sabahattin, Turgut Özal ve Adem-i Merkeziyetçi Yönetim Anlayışına Dair Sosyo-politik Bir İnceleme","authors":"H. Ateş","doi":"10.52096/usbd.8.33.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although it has been a long time since the presidential elections in our country, the society has not reached an environment of peace. In the past years, different management approaches have been faced with problems that disturbed the peace. The biggest mistake made in our country is to try to change the result regardless of the cause. In the Ottoman period, when the constitutional monarchy was introduced, actions were taken without considering whether the conjuncture in the society and the country was appropriate or not, and the change made did not yield the desired result. The same series of mistakes has continued regularly until today. Prince Sabahattin in the Ottoman period and Turgut Özal in the Republican period argued that the primary point that needed to be changed in society was not the top cadre of the administration or who would aspire to governance, but the mentality of the society and they tried to take some actions in order to make this change. However, since the steps taken for these actions were contrary to the interests of the bureaucrats and administrators who pursued their own interests in their periods, neither of them could realize their desire to bring people to individuality in the economic field and freedom in political life. In this study, firstly, the concepts of \"enterprise-personality\" and \"decentralization\" advocated by Prince Sabahattin will be examined and an introduction to the reflections of these concepts on Turgut Özal will be attempted. Keywords: Decentralization, Individualism, Free Market Economy, Freedom, Small State","PeriodicalId":506660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.33.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although it has been a long time since the presidential elections in our country, the society has not reached an environment of peace. In the past years, different management approaches have been faced with problems that disturbed the peace. The biggest mistake made in our country is to try to change the result regardless of the cause. In the Ottoman period, when the constitutional monarchy was introduced, actions were taken without considering whether the conjuncture in the society and the country was appropriate or not, and the change made did not yield the desired result. The same series of mistakes has continued regularly until today. Prince Sabahattin in the Ottoman period and Turgut Özal in the Republican period argued that the primary point that needed to be changed in society was not the top cadre of the administration or who would aspire to governance, but the mentality of the society and they tried to take some actions in order to make this change. However, since the steps taken for these actions were contrary to the interests of the bureaucrats and administrators who pursued their own interests in their periods, neither of them could realize their desire to bring people to individuality in the economic field and freedom in political life. In this study, firstly, the concepts of "enterprise-personality" and "decentralization" advocated by Prince Sabahattin will be examined and an introduction to the reflections of these concepts on Turgut Özal will be attempted. Keywords: Decentralization, Individualism, Free Market Economy, Freedom, Small State
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对萨巴赫丁亲王、图尔古特-厄扎尔和奥斯曼帝国至今的分权管理的社会政治分析
虽然我国的总统选举已经过去了很长时间,但社会并没有达到一个和平的环境。在过去的几年里,不同的管理方法都面临着扰乱治安的问题。我国所犯的最大错误就是不顾原因,试图改变结果。在奥斯曼帝国时期,在实行君主立宪制时,没有考虑社会和国家的情况是否合适就采取了行动,结果所做的改变并没有取得预期的效果。这一系列错误一直持续到今天。奥斯曼帝国时期的萨巴哈廷亲王和共和国时期的图尔古特-厄扎尔都认为,社会需要改变的首要问题不是行政部门的高层干部或谁有志于治理国家,而是社会的心态,他们试图采取一些行动来实现这种改变。然而,由于这些行动所采取的措施与官僚和行政人员的利益背道而驰,他们在各自的时期追求自己的利益,因此他们都无法实现让人们在经济领域实现个性、在政治生活中实现自由的愿望。在本研究中,首先将研究萨巴哈廷亲王倡导的 "企业-个性 "和 "权力下放 "概念,并尝试介绍这些概念对图尔古特-厄扎尔的影响。关键词权力下放、个人主义、自由市场经济、自由、小国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Almanya’da Çok Kültürlü Ortamda Yetişen Türk Kökenli Çocukların Türkçe Yayınlanan Yazılı ve Görsel Medyaya İlgisi Evde Bakım Desteğinden Faydalanan Ailelerde Bakım Yükü influence of work motivation on employee performance after mutation at PT PLN (PERSERO) UIK SBS Social Responsibility and Sustainability: The Changing Mission of Higher Education Kültürel Semboller ve Halkla ilişkiler: Yerel ve Küresel Yaklaşımlar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1