Zákon na ochranu republiky a ľavicová opozícia vo svetle rozhodovacej praxe Najvyššieho súdu ČSR (prečin „rušení obecného míru“)

Miriam Laclavíková, Tomáš Gábriš
{"title":"Zákon na ochranu republiky a ľavicová opozícia vo svetle rozhodovacej praxe Najvyššieho súdu ČSR (prečin „rušení obecného míru“)","authors":"Miriam Laclavíková, Tomáš Gábriš","doi":"10.14712/2464689x.2023.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors analyse decisions of the Supreme Court of the Czechoslovak Republic regarding the application of the Act on the Protection of the Republic (1923) in cases of disturbing the peace, perceived as manifestations of left-wing radicalism. In addition to the legal-historical analysis of selected representative cases, the authors also address the issue of proportionality within the framework of legislation and its judicial application in the sense of the necessity of the correct assessment of the necessity and adequacy of the state authorities’ interference into the freedom of speech in the changing situation of the 1920s and 1930s.","PeriodicalId":386369,"journal":{"name":"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689x.2023.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors analyse decisions of the Supreme Court of the Czechoslovak Republic regarding the application of the Act on the Protection of the Republic (1923) in cases of disturbing the peace, perceived as manifestations of left-wing radicalism. In addition to the legal-historical analysis of selected representative cases, the authors also address the issue of proportionality within the framework of legislation and its judicial application in the sense of the necessity of the correct assessment of the necessity and adequacy of the state authorities’ interference into the freedom of speech in the changing situation of the 1920s and 1930s.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据捷克斯洛伐克社会主义共和国最高法院的决策实践保护共和国和左翼反对派法("扰乱市政安宁 "罪)
作者分析了捷克斯洛伐克共和国最高法院关于在被视为左翼激进主义表现的扰乱治安案件中适用《共和国保护法》(1923 年)的判决。除了对部分代表性案例进行法律历史分析外,作者还探讨了立法框架内的相称性问题及其司法应用,即在 20 世纪 20 年代和 30 年代不断变化的形势下,必须正确评估国家当局干预言论自由的必要性和适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pojetí výprosy podle ABGB Knížecí spravedlnost. Soudnictví ve Valdštejnově Frýdlantském vévodství Zpráva z konference „Antonín Švehla, Alois Rašín a ti druzí“ Čo pre Slovákov znamenal a v súčasnosti znamená štátny sviatok Slovenského národného povstania? The Protection of Privacy Rights and Professional Secrecy in the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1