Seeing Beyond Words: An Investigation of Students' Opinions on Interactive Murals for Vocabulary Teaching

Sri Yuliani, Ari Linarta
{"title":"Seeing Beyond Words: An Investigation of Students' Opinions on Interactive Murals for Vocabulary Teaching","authors":"Sri Yuliani, Ari Linarta","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v14n2p174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the ways in which students view interactive murals as part of the vocabulary teaching and learning process in the classroom. A qualitative methodology and survey were administered to 22 elementary school students. The three components of the questionnaire were as follows: the pedagogical content of the feature of interactive mural, and motivation in using the murals. The questionnaire was administered to a research sample of 22 students who were specifically selected for the study. With a coefficient of scalability (CS) of at least 0.60 and a coefficient of reproducibility (CR) of at least 0.90, the data were deemed to meet the unidimental and cumulative features after being analyzed using the Guttman scale. The results revealed that the mean CS score was 0.91, indicating that the coefficients of scalability were deemed good, and the mean CR score from the three indicators was 0.90, indicating that the CR results were valid. Considering the mean recapitulation rate among the students was 16,33%, the students’ perception was positive. The results, which showed that students’ perceptions of the interactive smural’s use as a technology in the classroom were positively correlated with their use of learning resources. It was possible for the students to acquire new teaching tools, such as interactive murals. Murals werehave been suggested as a potentially engaging substitute for traditional classroom media, particularly when teaching vocabulary. In summary, by documenting the diverse perspectives, this research not only sheds light on the perceived advantages of interactive murals but also emphasizes how these visual aids can be utilizedused to create captivating and productive vocabulary learning opportunities. The findings have implications for teachers, curriculum developers, and legislators who want to improve vocabulary instruction in the classrooms by incorporating interactive and visually appealing elements of murals.","PeriodicalId":505938,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of English Language","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of English Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the ways in which students view interactive murals as part of the vocabulary teaching and learning process in the classroom. A qualitative methodology and survey were administered to 22 elementary school students. The three components of the questionnaire were as follows: the pedagogical content of the feature of interactive mural, and motivation in using the murals. The questionnaire was administered to a research sample of 22 students who were specifically selected for the study. With a coefficient of scalability (CS) of at least 0.60 and a coefficient of reproducibility (CR) of at least 0.90, the data were deemed to meet the unidimental and cumulative features after being analyzed using the Guttman scale. The results revealed that the mean CS score was 0.91, indicating that the coefficients of scalability were deemed good, and the mean CR score from the three indicators was 0.90, indicating that the CR results were valid. Considering the mean recapitulation rate among the students was 16,33%, the students’ perception was positive. The results, which showed that students’ perceptions of the interactive smural’s use as a technology in the classroom were positively correlated with their use of learning resources. It was possible for the students to acquire new teaching tools, such as interactive murals. Murals werehave been suggested as a potentially engaging substitute for traditional classroom media, particularly when teaching vocabulary. In summary, by documenting the diverse perspectives, this research not only sheds light on the perceived advantages of interactive murals but also emphasizes how these visual aids can be utilizedused to create captivating and productive vocabulary learning opportunities. The findings have implications for teachers, curriculum developers, and legislators who want to improve vocabulary instruction in the classrooms by incorporating interactive and visually appealing elements of murals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看得见的语言之外:学生对用于词汇教学的互动壁画的看法调查
本研究调查了学生如何看待互动壁画作为课堂词汇教学过程的一部分。研究采用定性方法,对 22 名小学生进行了问卷调查。问卷的三个组成部分如下:互动壁画特征的教学内容和使用壁画的动机。问卷调查的研究样本是专门为本研究挑选的 22 名学生。在使用古特曼量表进行分析后,数据的可扩展性系数(CS)不低于 0.60,可重复性系数(CR)不低于 0.90,被认为符合单实验和累积性特征。结果显示,CS 的平均值为 0.91,表明可扩展性系数良好;三项指标的平均 CR 值为 0.90,表明 CR 结果有效。考虑到学生的平均复述率为 16.33%,学生的感知是积极的。结果表明,学生对互动式语音室作为课堂技术的使用的看法与他们对学习资源的使用呈正相关。学生有可能获得新的教学工具,如互动壁画。有人认为,壁画可以替代传统的课堂媒体,特别是在教授词汇时。总之,通过记录不同的观点,本研究不仅揭示了交互式壁画的优势,还强调了如何利用这些视觉辅助工具来创造引人入胜、富有成效的词汇学习机会。研究结果对教师、课程开发者和立法者都有借鉴意义,他们都希望通过在课堂教学中融入互动壁画和具有视觉吸引力的元素来提高词汇教学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgements for World Journal of English Language, Vol. 14, No. 5 The Impact of Technology on the Motivation of English Language Learners in Online Settings Digital Game-Based Learning in Higher Education: ESL Teachers and Students Perceptions The Reality and Effects of Using Duolingo to Develop English Language Skills for EFL Learners in Jordan Wealth/Poverty Opposition in English and Kazakh: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1