Whether sodium and fluid restriction reduce exacerbations and readmissions for patients with heart failure: An integrative review

Lindsay K. MacArthur, Linda K. Jones
{"title":"Whether sodium and fluid restriction reduce exacerbations and readmissions for patients with heart failure: An integrative review","authors":"Lindsay K. MacArthur, Linda K. Jones","doi":"10.5430/ijh.v10n1p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heart failure (HF) is a chronic medical condition becoming increasingly prevalent around the world. This condition is linked to poor quality of life (QoL) due to the impact it has on patients functional status and mental health. There have been several advancements in the care and management of patients with HF with little change to self-care interventions resulting. Two self-care interventions which are recommended throughout clinical guidelines are sodium and fluid restriction. These are widely used and encouraged through patient education. Research, however, has questioned their validity and demonstrated a lack of evidence on improved outcomes. In order to determine whether changes to current practice is warranted, an integrative review has been completed. The aim is to assess whether these self-care interventions improve outcomes for patients with HF. From this review identified themes include a lack of robust data, the potential harm of interventions, and various outcomes extending beyond HF exacerbations and readmissions. There appears to be a lack of recent data on the impact of a fluid restriction as an independent variable. However, there are noted improvements in a variety of outcomes from both interventions outside of hospital readmissions which demonstrates they are valuable. Given these findings there is not enough evidence to remove restrictions but there are recommendations which can be made to modify current practice. These recommendations include liberalizing sodium and fluid restrictions and making restrictions more specific to the severity of HF for patients going forward.","PeriodicalId":73454,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v10n1p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic medical condition becoming increasingly prevalent around the world. This condition is linked to poor quality of life (QoL) due to the impact it has on patients functional status and mental health. There have been several advancements in the care and management of patients with HF with little change to self-care interventions resulting. Two self-care interventions which are recommended throughout clinical guidelines are sodium and fluid restriction. These are widely used and encouraged through patient education. Research, however, has questioned their validity and demonstrated a lack of evidence on improved outcomes. In order to determine whether changes to current practice is warranted, an integrative review has been completed. The aim is to assess whether these self-care interventions improve outcomes for patients with HF. From this review identified themes include a lack of robust data, the potential harm of interventions, and various outcomes extending beyond HF exacerbations and readmissions. There appears to be a lack of recent data on the impact of a fluid restriction as an independent variable. However, there are noted improvements in a variety of outcomes from both interventions outside of hospital readmissions which demonstrates they are valuable. Given these findings there is not enough evidence to remove restrictions but there are recommendations which can be made to modify current practice. These recommendations include liberalizing sodium and fluid restrictions and making restrictions more specific to the severity of HF for patients going forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限制钠盐和液体摄入是否能减少心力衰竭患者的病情加重和再入院:综述
心力衰竭(HF)是一种慢性疾病,在全球越来越普遍。由于心力衰竭会影响患者的功能状态和心理健康,因此患者的生活质量(QoL)很低。心房颤动患者的护理和管理已取得了一些进展,但自我护理干预措施却没有什么改变。临床指南中推荐的两种自我护理干预措施是限钠和限液。这些干预措施被广泛使用,并通过患者教育得到鼓励。然而,研究对其有效性提出了质疑,并显示缺乏改善疗效的证据。为了确定是否有必要改变目前的做法,我们完成了一项综合综述。目的是评估这些自我护理干预措施是否能改善高血压患者的预后。该综述确定的主题包括缺乏可靠的数据、干预措施的潜在危害以及除高血压恶化和再入院之外的各种结果。近期似乎缺乏有关液体限制作为独立变量的影响的数据。不过,这两种干预措施对再住院以外的各种结果都有明显改善,这表明它们是有价值的。鉴于这些研究结果,目前还没有足够的证据来取消限制,但可以提出一些建议来改变当前的做法。这些建议包括放宽钠和液体限制,并根据患者高血压的严重程度制定更具体的限制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using AI-based virtual triage to improve acuity-level alignment of patient care seeking in an ambulatory care setting School-based strategies to prevent depression in adolescents: An integrative review Green buildings and their impact on health outcomes and dietary intake: What do we know? Ukrainian refugee women’s experiences of settlement and navigating health and social services in Canada Whether sodium and fluid restriction reduce exacerbations and readmissions for patients with heart failure: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1