An Autoethnographic Dialogue with Motherhood Literature

Autret, Brad van Eeden-Moorefield
{"title":"An Autoethnographic Dialogue with Motherhood Literature","authors":"Autret, Brad van Eeden-Moorefield","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This autoethnography represents the first author’s journey as a mother and doctoral student researching mothers’ experiences in contending with the demands of work and family. Reading across different pockets of empirical motherhood literature (work-family conflict, contemporary motherhood, maternal gatekeeping, and intensive motherhood) I became troubled by how women’s realities were reflected. Pushing back against traditional methods that endorse separating my researcher identity from my maternal self, I draw on autoethnographic method to dialogue with this literature. This approach empowers me to speak out as a novice scholar uncomfortable with aspects of literature, while also navigating training in the use of traditional methods that often provide a directive to separate academic and personal identities. Importantly, doing so enables me to identify powerful insights about limitations in the literature, and how specific pockets of research can adversely affect the broader motherhood literature.","PeriodicalId":256338,"journal":{"name":"The Qualitative Report","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This autoethnography represents the first author’s journey as a mother and doctoral student researching mothers’ experiences in contending with the demands of work and family. Reading across different pockets of empirical motherhood literature (work-family conflict, contemporary motherhood, maternal gatekeeping, and intensive motherhood) I became troubled by how women’s realities were reflected. Pushing back against traditional methods that endorse separating my researcher identity from my maternal self, I draw on autoethnographic method to dialogue with this literature. This approach empowers me to speak out as a novice scholar uncomfortable with aspects of literature, while also navigating training in the use of traditional methods that often provide a directive to separate academic and personal identities. Importantly, doing so enables me to identify powerful insights about limitations in the literature, and how specific pockets of research can adversely affect the broader motherhood literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与母性文学的自述对话
这篇自述代表了第一作者作为母亲和博士生研究母亲应对工作和家庭需求的经验的心路历程。在阅读了不同类型的实证性母性文献(工作与家庭冲突、当代母性、母性把关和密集型母性)后,我对这些文献如何反映女性的现实情况感到困扰。传统的研究方法赞同将我的研究者身份与我的母性自我分离开来,而我则反对这种方法,我借鉴了自述方法来与这些文献进行对话。这种方法使我能够作为一个对文学作品的某些方面感到不自在的新手学者说出自己的看法,同时也使我能够在使用传统方法的培训中游刃有余,因为传统方法往往要求将学术身份与个人身份分离开来。重要的是,这样做使我能够发现文献中的局限性,以及特定的研究如何对更广泛的母性文献产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-Directed Learning in a Qualitative Research Methods Course for Doctoral Students Teaching Staff Mathematics University: Catalyst of the Emotional-Techno-Ontological Logic Navigating Credibility and Approachability in Conflict Zones: Insights from Fieldwork in Nigerian Communities Facing Eco-Violence Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Influence on Environmental Practices: Evidence from the Malaysian Aviation Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1