Evaluating data quality for blended data using a data quality framework

Jennifer D. Parker, Lisa B. Mirel, Philip Lee, Ryan Mintz, Andrew Tungate, Ambarish Vaidyanathan
{"title":"Evaluating data quality for blended data using a data quality framework","authors":"Jennifer D. Parker, Lisa B. Mirel, Philip Lee, Ryan Mintz, Andrew Tungate, Ambarish Vaidyanathan","doi":"10.3233/sji-230125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020 the U.S. Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) released “A Framework for Data Quality”, organized by 11 dimensions of data quality grouped among three domains of quality (utility, objectivity, integrity). This paper addresses the use of the FCSM Framework for data quality assessments of blended data. The FCSM Framework applies to all types of data, however best practices for implementation have not been documented. We applied the FCSM Framework for three health-research related case studies. For each case study, assessments of data quality dimensions were performed to identify threats to quality, possible mitigations of those threats, and trade-offs among them. From these assessments the authors concluded: 1) data quality assessments are more complex in practice than anticipated and expert guidance and documentation are important; 2) each dimension may not be equally important for different data uses; 3) data quality assessments can be subjective and having a quantitative tool could help explain the results, however, quantitative assessments may be closely tied to the intended use of the dataset; 4) there are common trade-offs and mitigations for some threats to quality among dimensions. This paper is one of the first to apply the FCSM Framework to specific use-cases and illustrates a process for similar data uses.","PeriodicalId":509522,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-230125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020 the U.S. Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) released “A Framework for Data Quality”, organized by 11 dimensions of data quality grouped among three domains of quality (utility, objectivity, integrity). This paper addresses the use of the FCSM Framework for data quality assessments of blended data. The FCSM Framework applies to all types of data, however best practices for implementation have not been documented. We applied the FCSM Framework for three health-research related case studies. For each case study, assessments of data quality dimensions were performed to identify threats to quality, possible mitigations of those threats, and trade-offs among them. From these assessments the authors concluded: 1) data quality assessments are more complex in practice than anticipated and expert guidance and documentation are important; 2) each dimension may not be equally important for different data uses; 3) data quality assessments can be subjective and having a quantitative tool could help explain the results, however, quantitative assessments may be closely tied to the intended use of the dataset; 4) there are common trade-offs and mitigations for some threats to quality among dimensions. This paper is one of the first to apply the FCSM Framework to specific use-cases and illustrates a process for similar data uses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用数据质量框架评估混合数据的数据质量
2020 年,美国联邦统计方法委员会(FCSM)发布了 "数据质量框架",该框架由 11 个数据质量维度组成,分为三个质量领域(实用性、客观性和完整性)。本文探讨了如何将 FCSM 框架用于混合数据的数据质量评估。FCSM 框架适用于所有类型的数据,但尚未记录实施的最佳实践。我们在三个与健康研究相关的案例研究中应用了 FCSM 框架。对于每个案例研究,我们都对数据质量的各个维度进行了评估,以确定对质量的威胁、这些威胁可能的缓解措施以及它们之间的权衡。通过这些评估,作者得出以下结论1)数据质量评估在实践中比预期的更加复杂,专家指导和文档记录非常重要;2)对于不同的数据用途,每个维度可能并不同等重要;3)数据质量评估可能是主观的,定量工具有助于解释评估结果,但是,定量评估可能与数据集的预期用途密切相关;4)对于某些维度的质量威胁,存在共同的权衡和缓解方法。本文是首批将 FCSM 框架应用于具体使用案例的文章之一,并说明了类似数据使用的流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outlier identification and adjustment for time series The production of official agricultural statistics in 2040: What does the future hold? The interdependence and cointegration of stock markets: Evidence from Japan, India and USA Identifying spatially differentiated pathways for rural transformation in Pakistan Crop sequence boundaries using USDA national agricultural statistics service historic cropland data layers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1