Intellectuals in the ruling elite political stratum of modern Russia: theoretical and applied aspects of sociological analysis

D. Pokatov
{"title":"Intellectuals in the ruling elite political stratum of modern Russia: theoretical and applied aspects of sociological analysis","authors":"D. Pokatov","doi":"10.26907/2079-5912.2023.6.98-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the rather urgent problem of the qualitative composition of the modern elite political stratum of the Russian society and the place occupied by intellectuals in it. The article compares the categories of intelligentsia and intellectuals, which allows us to say that intellectuals are a special social layer that has a number of basic features of the intelligentsia, with the exception of the representation of many of its members with a special ethical self-determination characteristic of this group. This is largely confirmed by the analysis of biographies of 685 political figures representing the modern Russian political elite. Using the latest research on this problem and the results of his own analysis of biographies of elite members, the author comes to the conclusion that, having the necessary theoretical basis, professional characteristics (in the form of appropriate education, experience of activity) modern intellectuals in the ruling elite form layers, one of which in the ruling elite group represents more formal-technocratic stratum, however, far from the layer of technostructure described by J. Galbraith, and in the near-elite environment – the layer of formally deideologized experts.","PeriodicalId":371231,"journal":{"name":"The Kazan socially-humanitarian bulletin","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Kazan socially-humanitarian bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2023.6.98-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the rather urgent problem of the qualitative composition of the modern elite political stratum of the Russian society and the place occupied by intellectuals in it. The article compares the categories of intelligentsia and intellectuals, which allows us to say that intellectuals are a special social layer that has a number of basic features of the intelligentsia, with the exception of the representation of many of its members with a special ethical self-determination characteristic of this group. This is largely confirmed by the analysis of biographies of 685 political figures representing the modern Russian political elite. Using the latest research on this problem and the results of his own analysis of biographies of elite members, the author comes to the conclusion that, having the necessary theoretical basis, professional characteristics (in the form of appropriate education, experience of activity) modern intellectuals in the ruling elite form layers, one of which in the ruling elite group represents more formal-technocratic stratum, however, far from the layer of technostructure described by J. Galbraith, and in the near-elite environment – the layer of formally deideologized experts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代俄罗斯统治精英政治阶层中的知识分子:社会学分析的理论和应用方面
文章探讨了俄罗斯社会现代精英政治阶层的质量构成以及知识分子在其中所占地位这一相当紧迫的问题。文章对知识分子和知识分子的分类进行了比较,从而得出结论:知识分子是一个特殊的社会阶层,它具有知识分子的一些基本特征,但许多知识分子的代表具有该群体特有的伦理自决权。对代表现代俄罗斯政治精英的 685 位政治人物的传记分析在很大程度上证实了这一点。作者利用对这一问题的最新研究和自己对精英成员传记的分析结果得出结论,即具有必要的理论基础和专业特征(以适当的教育、活动经验为形式)的现代知识分子在统治精英中形成了几个层次,其中一个层次在统治精英群体中代表着更为正式的技术官僚阶层,但与 J. 加尔布雷思所描述的技术结构层相去甚远,而在近精英环境中则是正式的去意识形态化专家层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regional youth policy tools to enhance youth civic and political participation of “risk group” (using the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan) "Everything is in order, but in a different way": reinterpretation of the Areopagite concept of hierarchy Motivation of students in the structure of online large classes in preparation for the main state exam (МSE) Construction of Soviet traditions among the members of amateur folk ensemble (on the example of the song and dance ensemble «Uralskaya Ryabinushka») The evolution of the phenomenon of bureaucracy in the context of decentralization of power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1