Examination of Seventh Grade Students' Van Hiele Geometric Thinking Levels and Their Mistakes on ' Quadrilaterals'

Sultan Satir, Aytaç Kurtulus
{"title":"Examination of Seventh Grade Students' Van Hiele Geometric Thinking Levels and Their Mistakes on ' Quadrilaterals'","authors":"Sultan Satir, Aytaç Kurtulus","doi":"10.59409/ojer.1366292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, it was aimed to examine seventh grade students' Van Hiele geometric thinking levels and their mistakes on 'Quadrias'. The research was conducted with ten seventh grade students and the case study model, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. The Van Hiele geometric thinking levels test developed by Usiskin and the diagnostic test developed by Başısık were rearranged and administered to the students. According to the research findings, seventh grade students have misconceptions about diagonal, height concepts and special quadrilaterals. One of the most important of these is that the square positioned on one corner cannot be recognized by students at the analysis level, but is recognized by students at the visualization level. Students at the analysis and visualization levels have different misconceptions regarding the trapezoid. While there is a misconception that all side lengths must be different from each other as a condition for being a trapezoid, there is also a misconception that having four sides is sufficient. Another one is related to the concept of diagonal. There is a misconception that shapes with equal side lengths also have equal diagonal lengths. While no errors or misconceptions were encountered in students at the informal level, misconceptions were encountered in students at the analysis level, and more errors were encountered in students who were visualization and could not be assigned to any level.","PeriodicalId":382167,"journal":{"name":"Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59409/ojer.1366292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine seventh grade students' Van Hiele geometric thinking levels and their mistakes on 'Quadrias'. The research was conducted with ten seventh grade students and the case study model, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. The Van Hiele geometric thinking levels test developed by Usiskin and the diagnostic test developed by Başısık were rearranged and administered to the students. According to the research findings, seventh grade students have misconceptions about diagonal, height concepts and special quadrilaterals. One of the most important of these is that the square positioned on one corner cannot be recognized by students at the analysis level, but is recognized by students at the visualization level. Students at the analysis and visualization levels have different misconceptions regarding the trapezoid. While there is a misconception that all side lengths must be different from each other as a condition for being a trapezoid, there is also a misconception that having four sides is sufficient. Another one is related to the concept of diagonal. There is a misconception that shapes with equal side lengths also have equal diagonal lengths. While no errors or misconceptions were encountered in students at the informal level, misconceptions were encountered in students at the analysis level, and more errors were encountered in students who were visualization and could not be assigned to any level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察七年级学生的范希尔几何思维水平及其在 "四边形 "上的错误
本研究旨在考察七年级学生的范希勒几何思维水平及其在 "Quadrias "上的错误。研究以 10 名七年级学生为对象,采用了定性研究方法之一的案例研究模式。重新编排并对学生进行了乌西斯金开发的范希勒几何思维水平测试和巴舍克开发的诊断测试。研究结果表明,七年级学生在对角线、高的概念和特殊四边形方面存在误解。其中最重要的一点是,学生在分析水平上无法识别位于一个角上的正方形,但在直观水平上却能识别。分析水平和直观水平的学生对梯形有不同的误解。有一种误解认为所有边长必须互不相同是梯形的一个条件,但也有一种误解认为有四条边就足够了。另一个误解与对角线的概念有关。有人误认为边长相等的图形对角线长度也相等。非正规水平的学生没有出现错误或误解,而分析水平的学生则出现了误解,直观水平的学生出现的错误较多,无法归入任何水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Bingo Games in Teaching “Jobs” in English Investigation of Pre-service Middle School Mathematics Teachers Habits of Mind in Pattern Generalization Problems The Relationship Between School Principals’ Diversity Management Behaviors And Teachers’ Job Performance Examination of Seventh Grade Students' Van Hiele Geometric Thinking Levels and Their Mistakes on ' Quadrilaterals' An investigation of Primary Education Mathematics Curriculum according to Transformation Geometry Levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1