Du Bois on Government and Democratic Debate

The Monist Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/monist/onad027
Chike Jeffers
{"title":"Du Bois on Government and Democratic Debate","authors":"Chike Jeffers","doi":"10.1093/monist/onad027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n I argue that the second chapter of W.E.B. Du Bois’s The Souls of Black Folk has been underappreciated as a work of political philosophy, as Du Bois offers us in it a way of understanding what a government is and how to evaluate when a government is good. I relate Du Bois’s account of governmental leadership in that chapter to his critique of Booker T. Washington as a nongovernmental leader in chapter 3 of Souls. While doing this, I also pay attention to Du Bois’s account of democratic debate in chapter 3.","PeriodicalId":516548,"journal":{"name":"The Monist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Monist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onad027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I argue that the second chapter of W.E.B. Du Bois’s The Souls of Black Folk has been underappreciated as a work of political philosophy, as Du Bois offers us in it a way of understanding what a government is and how to evaluate when a government is good. I relate Du Bois’s account of governmental leadership in that chapter to his critique of Booker T. Washington as a nongovernmental leader in chapter 3 of Souls. While doing this, I also pay attention to Du Bois’s account of democratic debate in chapter 3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杜波依斯谈政府和民主辩论
我认为,W.E.B. 杜波依斯的《黑人的灵魂》第二章作为一部政治哲学著作一直没有得到充分的重视,因为杜波依斯在这一章中为我们提供了一种理解什么是政府以及如何评价政府好坏的方法。我将杜波依斯在该章中对政府领导力的论述与他在《灵魂》第 3 章中对布克-华盛顿作为非政府领袖的批评联系起来。在此过程中,我还注意到杜波依斯在第三章中对民主辩论的论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Saved by the Dark Forest: How a Multitude of Extraterrestrial Civilizations Can Prevent a Hobbesian Trap Risk, Non-Identity, and Extinction Concepts of Existential Catastrophe Should Longtermists Recommend Hastening Extinction Rather Than Delaying It? Existential Risk, Climate Change, and Nonideal Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1