臺灣醫預法與國外醫糾處理及通報制度之比較

洪聖惠 洪聖惠, 謝亨如 Sheng-Hui Hung
{"title":"臺灣醫預法與國外醫糾處理及通報制度之比較","authors":"洪聖惠 洪聖惠, 謝亨如 Sheng-Hui Hung","doi":"10.53106/199457952024011801001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 目的:過去十多年以來,臺灣以鼓勵自願性通報(Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting system , TPR)作為提升病安文化的方式,在「醫療事故預防及爭議處理法」實施後,未來凡符合「重大醫療事故」定義者皆需進行法定通報,本文整理比較各國通報制度,作為臺灣實施之參考。結果:比較臺灣與各國之異同:臺灣病安通報發展模式與英國相近,先由自願性通報開始,發展至法定通報;澳洲由各地方政府自訂法定通報事項,其中Safer Care Victoria(SCV)的11類Sentinel Event (SE) 法定通報事件,可作為定義重大醫療事故(Never Events)時的參考,此外,澳洲由獨立單位負責根本原因分析調查,可作為臺灣推動之參考。結論:醫預法施行後仍需持續監測評估此一法定通報制度之成效,以達到預防及促進病人安全之目的。\n Purpose: In Taiwan, over the past ten years, voluntary reporting (Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting system (TPR)) was encouraged as the strategy to improve the culture of patient safety. After the implementation of \"\" Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act\"\", any incidence meets the definition of \"\"Never Events\"\" will be subject to Mandatory Reporting System in the future. What will be the expected effects of changing this reporting system on improving medical quality and promoting patient safety? By comparing the reporting systems among countries will serve as the reference for Taiwan after implementation. Research methods: \"\"Document analysis\"\" and \"\"comparative study\"\" will be applied for this article. Result: To compare the discrepancy between Taiwan and the other countries, refer to the following: The development of Taiwan’s patient safety reporting system is similar to the model of the United Kingdom, gradually developing from voluntary to mandatory reporting; in Australia, local governments can define their own items for mandatory reporting, among which the 11 types of mandatory reporting Sentinel Event (SE) of Safer Care Victoria (SCV) can be used as the reference for the definition of Never Events, in addition, Australia has an independent unit responsible for Root Cause Analysis (RCA), which can be also used as the reference for Taiwan to promote RCA after the implementation of Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act. Conclusion: After the official implementation of Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act, it is necessary to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of this Mandatory Reporting system to establish the culture of patient safety in our country.\n \n","PeriodicalId":260200,"journal":{"name":"醫療品質雜誌","volume":"347 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"醫療品質雜誌","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/199457952024011801001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

目的:過去十多年以來,臺灣以鼓勵自願性通報(Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting system , TPR)作為提升病安文化的方式,在「醫療事故預防及爭議處理法」實施後,未來凡符合「重大醫療事故」定義者皆需進行法定通報,本文整理比較各國通報制度,作為臺灣實施之參考。結果:比較臺灣與各國之異同:臺灣病安通報發展模式與英國相近,先由自願性通報開始,發展至法定通報;澳洲由各地方政府自訂法定通報事項,其中Safer Care Victoria(SCV)的11類Sentinel Event (SE) 法定通報事件,可作為定義重大醫療事故(Never Events)時的參考,此外,澳洲由獨立單位負責根本原因分析調查,可作為臺灣推動之參考。結論:醫預法施行後仍需持續監測評估此一法定通報制度之成效,以達到預防及促進病人安全之目的。 Purpose: In Taiwan, over the past ten years, voluntary reporting (Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting system (TPR)) was encouraged as the strategy to improve the culture of patient safety. After the implementation of "" Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act"", any incidence meets the definition of ""Never Events"" will be subject to Mandatory Reporting System in the future. What will be the expected effects of changing this reporting system on improving medical quality and promoting patient safety? By comparing the reporting systems among countries will serve as the reference for Taiwan after implementation. Research methods: ""Document analysis"" and ""comparative study"" will be applied for this article. Result: To compare the discrepancy between Taiwan and the other countries, refer to the following: The development of Taiwan’s patient safety reporting system is similar to the model of the United Kingdom, gradually developing from voluntary to mandatory reporting; in Australia, local governments can define their own items for mandatory reporting, among which the 11 types of mandatory reporting Sentinel Event (SE) of Safer Care Victoria (SCV) can be used as the reference for the definition of Never Events, in addition, Australia has an independent unit responsible for Root Cause Analysis (RCA), which can be also used as the reference for Taiwan to promote RCA after the implementation of Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act. Conclusion: After the official implementation of Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act, it is necessary to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of this Mandatory Reporting system to establish the culture of patient safety in our country.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臺灣醫預法與國外醫糾處理及通報制度之比較
目的:過去十多年以來,臺灣以鼓勵自願性通報(Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting System 、TPR)作為提升病安文化的方式,在「醫療事故預防及爭議處理法」實施後,未來凡符合「重大醫療事故」定義者皆需進行法定通報,本文整理比較各國通報制度,作為臺灣實施之參考。結果:比較臺灣與各國之異同:臺灣病安通報發展模式與英國相近,先由自願性通報開始,發展至法定通報;澳洲由各地方政府自訂法定通報事項,其中SaferCare Victoria(SCV)的11類Sentinel Event (SE) 法定通報事件,可作為定義重大醫療事故(Never Events)時的參考,此外,澳洲由獨立單位負責根本原因分析調查,可作為臺灣推動之參考:在台灣,過去十年來,鼓勵自願報告(台灣病人安全報告制度(TPR))作為改善病人安全文化的策略。医疗事故防制及纠纷处理法》实施后,任何符合 "从未发生事件 "定义的事件今后都将被纳入强制报告制度。改变这一报告制度对提高医疗质量和促进患者安全的预期效果如何?通过比较各国的报告制度,为台湾实施后的报告制度提供参考。研究方法:"本文将采用 "文献分析法 "和 "比较研究法"。研究结果比较台湾与其他国家的差异,请参考以下内容:台湾患者安全报告制度的发展与英国模式类似,由自愿报告逐步发展为强制报告;澳大利亚地方政府可自行定义强制报告项目,其中维多利亚州医疗安全组织(SCV)的11种强制报告哨点事件(SE)可作为 "从未发生事件 "定义的参考,此外,澳大利亚有独立的负责根源分析(RCA)的单位,这也可作为台湾在《医疗事故预防与纠纷解决法》实施后推广RCA的参考。结论在《医疗事故预防与纠纷处理法》正式实施后,有必要持续监控和评估该强制报告制度的有效性,以建立我国的患者安全文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
針對腦神經科醫護人員早期安寧緩和療護線上課程之效益 潛伏結核感染診斷與治療簡介 外部認證對於創傷性腦損傷照護團隊之影響 醫策會國家品質獎卓越中心:風濕免疫中心品質提升與成果分享 臺北榮總傑出醫療團隊之管理與創新策略
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1