Improving Outcomes in Patients Sent to the Emergency Department from Outpatient Providers: A Receiver-Driven Handoff Process Improvement

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.008
Kristina DeVore MSN, RN (is Nurse Navigator, Department of Nursing–Continuum of Care Management, University of Iowa Health Care.), Katherine Schneider MSN, RN (is Clinical Coordinator, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.), Elyse Laures PhD, RN (is Nurse Scientist, Department of Nursing–Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, University of Iowa Health Care.), Alison Harmon MSN, RN (is Director of Emergency Medical Transport Services, Department of Nursing, University of Iowa Health Care.), Paul Van Heukelom MD (is Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa. Please address correspondence to Katherine Schneider)
{"title":"Improving Outcomes in Patients Sent to the Emergency Department from Outpatient Providers: A Receiver-Driven Handoff Process Improvement","authors":"Kristina DeVore MSN, RN (is Nurse Navigator, Department of Nursing–Continuum of Care Management, University of Iowa Health Care.),&nbsp;Katherine Schneider MSN, RN (is Clinical Coordinator, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.),&nbsp;Elyse Laures PhD, RN (is Nurse Scientist, Department of Nursing–Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, University of Iowa Health Care.),&nbsp;Alison Harmon MSN, RN (is Director of Emergency Medical Transport Services, Department of Nursing, University of Iowa Health Care.),&nbsp;Paul Van Heukelom MD (is Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa. Please address correspondence to Katherine Schneider)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Outpatient providers refer to emergency departments (EDs) due to findings requiring assessment beyond existing capabilities. However, poor communication surrounding these transitions may hinder safety and timeliness of emergency care. Receiver-driven handoff (RDH) is a process that helps ensure that all pertinent information is shared. This quality improvement project aimed to (1) improve knowledge of RDH, (2) increase satisfaction and perceptions surrounding RDH, (3) modify behaviors in relation to RDH, and (4) decrease referred patients leaving without being seen (LWBS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Iowa Model and Implementation Framework guided this evidence-based quality improvement project. A multidisciplinary team developed and implemented a standardized RDH process consisting of screening to determine whether a patient was referred to the ED, review of electronic health record (EHR), and use of EHR documentation. Process measures were collected via questionnaire pre- and postimplementation and were analyzed quantitatively. Outcome measures were trended by a statistical process control p-chart, which was developed to demonstrate changes in the percentage of patients who were referred to the ED from the outpatient setting and LWBS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average response for the question “How satisfied are you with the handoff of patient information from referring clinic providers to the ED?” increased from 1.51 preintervention to 2.04 postintervention (<em>p</em> = 0.005). Respondents rated the information received during handoff higher postintervention (2.12 vs. 2.52, <em>p</em> = 0.04). Compliance with screening for referral to the ED was 84.0%. The proportion of patients LWBS after referral decreased by 6.2 percentage points (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using RDH in conjunction with a standardized triage screening may improve quality of information shared during this vulnerable transition and may assist in reduction of referred patients LWBS. The RDH process should be adapted into everyday workflow to ensure sustainability and effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Outpatient providers refer to emergency departments (EDs) due to findings requiring assessment beyond existing capabilities. However, poor communication surrounding these transitions may hinder safety and timeliness of emergency care. Receiver-driven handoff (RDH) is a process that helps ensure that all pertinent information is shared. This quality improvement project aimed to (1) improve knowledge of RDH, (2) increase satisfaction and perceptions surrounding RDH, (3) modify behaviors in relation to RDH, and (4) decrease referred patients leaving without being seen (LWBS).

Methods

The Iowa Model and Implementation Framework guided this evidence-based quality improvement project. A multidisciplinary team developed and implemented a standardized RDH process consisting of screening to determine whether a patient was referred to the ED, review of electronic health record (EHR), and use of EHR documentation. Process measures were collected via questionnaire pre- and postimplementation and were analyzed quantitatively. Outcome measures were trended by a statistical process control p-chart, which was developed to demonstrate changes in the percentage of patients who were referred to the ED from the outpatient setting and LWBS.

Results

The average response for the question “How satisfied are you with the handoff of patient information from referring clinic providers to the ED?” increased from 1.51 preintervention to 2.04 postintervention (p = 0.005). Respondents rated the information received during handoff higher postintervention (2.12 vs. 2.52, p = 0.04). Compliance with screening for referral to the ED was 84.0%. The proportion of patients LWBS after referral decreased by 6.2 percentage points (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Using RDH in conjunction with a standardized triage screening may improve quality of information shared during this vulnerable transition and may assist in reduction of referred patients LWBS. The RDH process should be adapted into everyday workflow to ensure sustainability and effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善从门诊医疗机构送往急诊科的患者的治疗效果:接收者驱动的移交流程改进
背景门诊病人因发现需要进行超出现有能力的评估而转诊至急诊科(ED)。然而,围绕这些转诊的沟通不畅可能会妨碍急诊护理的安全性和及时性。接收方驱动的交接(RDH)是一种有助于确保共享所有相关信息的流程。该质量改进项目旨在:(1)增进对 RDH 的了解;(2)提高对 RDH 的满意度和认知度;(3)改变与 RDH 相关的行为;以及(4)减少转诊患者未就诊即离开的情况(LWBS)。一个多学科团队制定并实施了标准化的 RDH 流程,包括筛查以确定患者是否被转诊至急诊室、查看电子健康记录 (EHR) 以及使用 EHR 文档。在实施前和实施后,通过问卷调查收集过程测量数据,并进行定量分析。结果 "您对转诊诊所提供者向急诊室移交患者信息的满意度如何?"这一问题的平均回答从干预前的 1.51 分上升到干预后的 2.04 分(p = 0.005)。干预后,受访者对交接过程中收到的信息评分更高(2.12 vs. 2.52,p = 0.04)。转诊至急诊室的筛查符合率为 84.0%。结论将 RDH 与标准化分诊筛查结合使用,可提高在这一易受伤害的转诊过程中共享信息的质量,并有助于减少转诊患者的低生命体征。RDH 流程应适应日常工作流程,以确保可持续性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 50th Anniversary Article Collections: Diagnostic Excellence Supporting Professionalism in a Crisis Requires Leadership and a Well-Developed Plan. Quality and Simulation Professionals Should Collaborate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1