首页 > 最新文献

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety最新文献

英文 中文
The Scholarly Upside to MOC4. MOC4的学术优势。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.014
Glenn Seela, David Satin, Cathy Centola, Sameer Gupta, Paul Hodges, Jeff Louie, Tanya E Melnik, David Pelletier, Christina Russell, Andrew Thompson, Jordan Marmet

Background: Many medical boards require quality improvement (QI) projects for Maintenance of Certification Part IV (MOC4) credits. The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) allows health care organizations that can demonstrate sufficient QI standards to become Portfolio Program Sponsors. This enables internal review and approval of QI projects, crediting all sufficiently contributing physicians. The University of Minnesota's M Health Fairview MOC4 Review Board (MMRB) was approved as an ABMS Portfolio Program Sponsor; the impact was surveyed from inception in 2016 to 2022. The objective was to examine the impact of a Portfolio Sponsor program on scholarship, sustainability, and spread of QI projects.

Methods: The authors developed and validated an eight-question survey directed at MOC4 principal investigators (PIs) who were awarded credits through the MMRB from 2016 to 2022. Participants reported on numbers of peer-reviewed publication or presentation, and their perception of increased preparedness for scholarship due to the application process. They also reported on sustainment or spread following their original QI project.

Results: Fifty projects were reviewed over a seven-year span. Of these, 44 were approved as demonstrating sufficient QI rigor per ABMS standards. Of 41 PIs, 27 (65.9%) responded to the survey; 15 (55.6%) agreed that the MMRB process helped prepare them for scholarly dissemination, 19 (70.4%) delivered oral or poster presentations, and 10 (37.0%) submitted a total of 14 manuscripts for publication, 10 of which were accepted. A total of 23 QI projects (85.2%) were sustained, and 10 (37.0%) had spread.

Conclusion: In addition to generating essential MOC4 credits for participating physicians, an MMRB process can help PIs prepare for scholarship, project sustainment, and spread.

背景:许多医学委员会要求质量改进(QI)项目来维护认证第四部分(MOC4)学分。美国医学专业委员会(ABMS)允许能够证明足够的QI标准的卫生保健组织成为投资组合计划的赞助商。这使得QI项目能够进行内部审查和批准,并将所有充分贡献的医生归功于自己。明尼苏达大学M Health Fairview MOC4审查委员会(MMRB)被批准为ABMS投资组合项目赞助商;从2016年开始到2022年,对其影响进行了调查。目的是检查投资组合赞助计划对奖学金、可持续性和QI项目传播的影响。方法:作者开发并验证了一项针对2016年至2022年通过MMRB获得学分的MOC4首席研究员(pi)的8个问题调查。参与者报告了同行评审的出版物或演讲的数量,以及他们对申请过程提高奖学金准备程度的看法。他们还报告了原始QI项目之后的维持或传播情况。结果:在7年的时间里对50个项目进行了审查。其中,44个被批准为证明了足够的符合ABMS标准的QI严格性。41个pi中,27个(65.9%)回应了调查;15人(55.6%)认为MMRB过程帮助他们为学术传播做好了准备,19人(70.4%)进行了口头或海报演讲,10人(37.0%)提交了14篇论文供发表,其中10篇被接受。共有23个项目(85.2%)得到维持,10个项目(37.0%)得到扩展。结论:除了为参与项目的医生产生必要的MOC4学分外,MMRB流程还可以帮助pi为奖学金、项目维持和推广做好准备。
{"title":"The Scholarly Upside to MOC4.","authors":"Glenn Seela, David Satin, Cathy Centola, Sameer Gupta, Paul Hodges, Jeff Louie, Tanya E Melnik, David Pelletier, Christina Russell, Andrew Thompson, Jordan Marmet","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many medical boards require quality improvement (QI) projects for Maintenance of Certification Part IV (MOC4) credits. The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) allows health care organizations that can demonstrate sufficient QI standards to become Portfolio Program Sponsors. This enables internal review and approval of QI projects, crediting all sufficiently contributing physicians. The University of Minnesota's M Health Fairview MOC4 Review Board (MMRB) was approved as an ABMS Portfolio Program Sponsor; the impact was surveyed from inception in 2016 to 2022. The objective was to examine the impact of a Portfolio Sponsor program on scholarship, sustainability, and spread of QI projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors developed and validated an eight-question survey directed at MOC4 principal investigators (PIs) who were awarded credits through the MMRB from 2016 to 2022. Participants reported on numbers of peer-reviewed publication or presentation, and their perception of increased preparedness for scholarship due to the application process. They also reported on sustainment or spread following their original QI project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty projects were reviewed over a seven-year span. Of these, 44 were approved as demonstrating sufficient QI rigor per ABMS standards. Of 41 PIs, 27 (65.9%) responded to the survey; 15 (55.6%) agreed that the MMRB process helped prepare them for scholarly dissemination, 19 (70.4%) delivered oral or poster presentations, and 10 (37.0%) submitted a total of 14 manuscripts for publication, 10 of which were accepted. A total of 23 QI projects (85.2%) were sustained, and 10 (37.0%) had spread.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to generating essential MOC4 credits for participating physicians, an MMRB process can help PIs prepare for scholarship, project sustainment, and spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"101-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of the Revised American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hyperbilirubinemia Decreases Necessity for Serum Bilirubin and Phototherapy. 修订后的美国儿科学会高胆红素血症临床实践指南的实施降低了血清胆红素和光疗的必要性。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.013
Matthew R Michienzi, Dakota K Tomasini, Carleigh C Fisher, Adharsh P Ponnapakkam

Background: The initial hyperbilirubinemia management recommendations published by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 2004 and updated in 2009 led to wide variations in clinical practice among providers, with variable results. In August 2022 AAP published updated clinical practice guidelines for the management of hyperbilirubinemia. The aim of this project was to determine the effect of adaptation of the AAP guidelines on laboratory testing, readmission rates, and phototherapy.

Methods: Existing institutional protocol was updated to incorporate the revised AAP guidelines. The primary outcome was percentage of serum bilirubin labs obtained. Balancing measures included monthly readmission rate, need for escalation of care, and percentage of patients requiring additional labs or phototherapy. Statistical process control charts measured changes in quality over time. Chi-square analysis evaluated differences between pre- and postintervention periods.

Results: A total of 2,301 infants were evaluated, 1,662 of which were included in the postintervention analysis. A clinically and statistically significant decrease was seen in the percentage of patients with serum bilirubin evaluation, from 21.3% to 8.8% (p < 0.001). There was a decrease in need for phototherapy, from 4.2% to 1.4% (p < 0.001), but duration of treatment was longer when initiated. The authors simultaneously saw no changes in readmission rate or additional laboratory evaluation, with no incidence of bilirubin-induced encephalopathy or escalation of care.

Conclusion: Implementation of the revised 2022 AAP guidelines was associated with a decrease in serum bilirubin evaluation and phototherapy initiation. This integrated protocol may represent a sustainable standardized approach to management of hyperbilirubinemia.

背景:美国儿科学会(AAP)于2004年和2009年发布的最初的高胆红素血症管理建议导致了提供者在临床实践中的广泛差异,结果也各不相同。2022年8月,AAP发布了最新的高胆红素血症管理临床实践指南。该项目的目的是确定AAP指南对实验室检测、再入院率和光疗的影响。方法:更新现有的机构方案以纳入修订后的AAP指南。主要结果是获得血清胆红素的百分比。平衡措施包括每月再入院率、护理升级需求和需要额外实验室或光疗的患者百分比。统计过程控制图表测量了质量随时间的变化。卡方分析评估了干预前后的差异。结果:共有2301名婴儿被评估,其中1662名被纳入干预后分析。进行血清胆红素评估的患者比例从21.3%降至8.8%,在临床和统计学上均有显著下降(p < 0.001)。光疗需求从4.2%下降到1.4% (p < 0.001),但治疗持续时间较开始时更长。同时,作者没有发现再入院率或额外的实验室评估的变化,没有胆红素诱导的脑病的发生率或护理的升级。结论:修订后的2022年AAP指南的实施与血清胆红素评估和光疗起始量的下降有关。这一综合方案可能代表一种可持续的标准化方法来管理高胆红素血症。
{"title":"Implementation of the Revised American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hyperbilirubinemia Decreases Necessity for Serum Bilirubin and Phototherapy.","authors":"Matthew R Michienzi, Dakota K Tomasini, Carleigh C Fisher, Adharsh P Ponnapakkam","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The initial hyperbilirubinemia management recommendations published by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 2004 and updated in 2009 led to wide variations in clinical practice among providers, with variable results. In August 2022 AAP published updated clinical practice guidelines for the management of hyperbilirubinemia. The aim of this project was to determine the effect of adaptation of the AAP guidelines on laboratory testing, readmission rates, and phototherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Existing institutional protocol was updated to incorporate the revised AAP guidelines. The primary outcome was percentage of serum bilirubin labs obtained. Balancing measures included monthly readmission rate, need for escalation of care, and percentage of patients requiring additional labs or phototherapy. Statistical process control charts measured changes in quality over time. Chi-square analysis evaluated differences between pre- and postintervention periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,301 infants were evaluated, 1,662 of which were included in the postintervention analysis. A clinically and statistically significant decrease was seen in the percentage of patients with serum bilirubin evaluation, from 21.3% to 8.8% (p < 0.001). There was a decrease in need for phototherapy, from 4.2% to 1.4% (p < 0.001), but duration of treatment was longer when initiated. The authors simultaneously saw no changes in readmission rate or additional laboratory evaluation, with no incidence of bilirubin-induced encephalopathy or escalation of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of the revised 2022 AAP guidelines was associated with a decrease in serum bilirubin evaluation and phototherapy initiation. This integrated protocol may represent a sustainable standardized approach to management of hyperbilirubinemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment to Address Quality Markers in Health Care: An Innovation for Prospective Hazard Analysis. 模拟汇报增强需求评估,以解决医疗保健中的质量指标问题:前瞻性危害分析的创新。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.004
Lisa T Barker, William F Bond, Ann M Willemsen-Dunlap, Kimberly L Cooley, Jeremy S McGarvey, Rebecca L Ruger, Adam Kohlrus, Michael J Kremer, Michelle Sergel, John A Vozenilek

Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment (SDENA) is a simulation-based approach to prospective hazard analysis that uses simulation and debriefing as a unit-level diagnostic tool. Scenarios address failure modes for health care improvement targets, and debriefing explores unit-specific barriers and resiliencies. Debriefing guides are structured to explore how six drivers of a behavior engineering framework (data, tools/resources, incentives, knowledge/skills, capacity, motivation) influence clinical behaviors. Illinois Hospital Association members who deployed SDENA to address specific hospital-acquired conditions found motivation to be a more significant barrier than anticipated before deployment. SDENA represents a novel approach to improving safety and may refine intervention targets.

模拟-汇报强化需求评估(SDENA)是一种基于模拟的前瞻性危害分析方法,使用模拟和汇报作为单位级诊断工具。场景解决了医疗保健改进目标的失败模式,汇报探讨了单位特定的障碍和弹性。汇报指南的结构是为了探索行为工程框架的六个驱动因素(数据、工具/资源、激励、知识/技能、能力、动机)如何影响临床行为。伊利诺斯州医院协会成员部署SDENA来解决特定的医院获得性疾病,他们发现动机是比部署前预期的更大的障碍。SDENA代表了一种提高安全性的新方法,可以完善干预目标。
{"title":"Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment to Address Quality Markers in Health Care: An Innovation for Prospective Hazard Analysis.","authors":"Lisa T Barker, William F Bond, Ann M Willemsen-Dunlap, Kimberly L Cooley, Jeremy S McGarvey, Rebecca L Ruger, Adam Kohlrus, Michael J Kremer, Michelle Sergel, John A Vozenilek","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment (SDENA) is a simulation-based approach to prospective hazard analysis that uses simulation and debriefing as a unit-level diagnostic tool. Scenarios address failure modes for health care improvement targets, and debriefing explores unit-specific barriers and resiliencies. Debriefing guides are structured to explore how six drivers of a behavior engineering framework (data, tools/resources, incentives, knowledge/skills, capacity, motivation) influence clinical behaviors. Illinois Hospital Association members who deployed SDENA to address specific hospital-acquired conditions found motivation to be a more significant barrier than anticipated before deployment. SDENA represents a novel approach to improving safety and may refine intervention targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"144-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Do We Know When We Have Done Enough? Ensuring Sufficient Patient Notification Efforts After a Large-Scale Adverse Event. 我们怎么知道我们做得够多了?确保在大规模不良事件发生后充分通知患者。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.010
David Alfandre, Mary Beth Foglia, Mark Holodniy, A Rani Elwy
{"title":"How Do We Know When We Have Done Enough? Ensuring Sufficient Patient Notification Efforts After a Large-Scale Adverse Event.","authors":"David Alfandre, Mary Beth Foglia, Mark Holodniy, A Rani Elwy","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining Patient Safety Events Using the Behaviour Change Wheel: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. 使用行为改变轮检查患者安全事件:横断面分析。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.001
Mari Somerville, Christine Cassidy, Shannon MacPhee, Douglas Sinclair, Jane Palmer, Daniel Keefe, Shauna Best, Janet Curran

Background: Precursor-level safety events (PSEs) pose greater patient risk than no-harm events but are not as severe as serious safety events. Despite their potential for harm, the underlying determinants associated with PSEs are poorly understood. This study aimed to use a behavior change framework to understand the underlying determinants of PSEs and whether associated action items aligned with the behavior.

Methods: This cross-sectional study took place in a maternal/pediatric hospital. A total of 58 prerecorded PSEs were analyzed using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW); a behavioral framework that identifies sources of behavior and proposes intervention types that address said behavior. Researchers and clinicians independently coded each PSE's underlying determinant and action items using the relevant components of the BCW. The types and frequency of underlying behavioral determinants and intervention types for each PSE were documented. A matrix, based on the BCW, reflected how often the underlying behavior aligned with the corresponding action item.

Results: Of the 58 PSEs, six behavioral determinants and seven intervention types were identified. Environmental context/resources was the behavioral determinant coded most often (25.4%); education was the most common intervention type (45.8%). Several underlying determinants (24.6%) and action items (8.3%) received no code due to limited information. Based on the BCW matrix, 34.2% of behavioral determinants were addressed with interventions that would target the underlying behavior, while 37.8% did not align, and 28.1% could not be coded due to missing behavioral information.

Conclusion: This study identified poor alignment between types of interventions and underlying determinants in more than one third of analyzed PSEs. This included using educational interventions in about 50% of events, despite this type of intervention being ineffective for most of the coded behaviors. Further, alignment of many safety events could not be determined due to limited reported information. This highlights a need to design more systematic, behavior-informed approaches to reporting PSEs and identifying interventions to effectively change behavior.

背景:前体级安全事件(PSE)对患者造成的风险比无害事件更大,但不如严重安全事件严重。尽管它们可能造成伤害,但人们对与 PSE 相关的潜在决定因素却知之甚少。本研究旨在使用行为改变框架来了解 PSE 的基本决定因素以及相关行动项目是否与行为一致:这项横断面研究在一家母婴医院进行。共使用行为改变轮(BCW)分析了 58 个预先录制的 PSE;行为改变轮是一个行为框架,可识别行为来源并提出针对所述行为的干预类型。研究人员和临床医生使用 BCW 的相关组件对每个 PSE 的基本决定因素和行动项目进行独立编码。每个 PSE 的基本行为决定因素和干预类型的类型和频率都记录在案。基于《行为守则》的矩阵反映了基本行为与相应行动项目的一致性:结果:在 58 项 PSE 中,确定了六种行为决定因素和七种干预类型。环境背景/资源是最常见的行为决定因素(25.4%);教育是最常见的干预类型(45.8%)。由于信息有限,一些基本决定因素(24.6%)和行动项目(8.3%)没有编码。根据 BCW 矩阵,34.2% 的行为决定因素与针对基本行为的干预措施相一致,37.8% 的行为决定因素与干预措施不一致,28.1% 的行为决定因素因行为信息缺失而无法编码:本研究发现,在超过三分之一的被分析的 PSE 中,干预类型与基本决定因素之间的一致性较差。这包括在约 50% 的事件中使用了教育干预,尽管这种类型的干预对大多数编码行为无效。此外,由于报告的信息有限,许多安全事件的一致性无法确定。这凸显出需要设计更系统的、行为知情的方法来报告 PSE,并确定有效改变行为的干预措施。
{"title":"Examining Patient Safety Events Using the Behaviour Change Wheel: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Mari Somerville, Christine Cassidy, Shannon MacPhee, Douglas Sinclair, Jane Palmer, Daniel Keefe, Shauna Best, Janet Curran","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precursor-level safety events (PSEs) pose greater patient risk than no-harm events but are not as severe as serious safety events. Despite their potential for harm, the underlying determinants associated with PSEs are poorly understood. This study aimed to use a behavior change framework to understand the underlying determinants of PSEs and whether associated action items aligned with the behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study took place in a maternal/pediatric hospital. A total of 58 prerecorded PSEs were analyzed using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW); a behavioral framework that identifies sources of behavior and proposes intervention types that address said behavior. Researchers and clinicians independently coded each PSE's underlying determinant and action items using the relevant components of the BCW. The types and frequency of underlying behavioral determinants and intervention types for each PSE were documented. A matrix, based on the BCW, reflected how often the underlying behavior aligned with the corresponding action item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58 PSEs, six behavioral determinants and seven intervention types were identified. Environmental context/resources was the behavioral determinant coded most often (25.4%); education was the most common intervention type (45.8%). Several underlying determinants (24.6%) and action items (8.3%) received no code due to limited information. Based on the BCW matrix, 34.2% of behavioral determinants were addressed with interventions that would target the underlying behavior, while 37.8% did not align, and 28.1% could not be coded due to missing behavioral information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified poor alignment between types of interventions and underlying determinants in more than one third of analyzed PSEs. This included using educational interventions in about 50% of events, despite this type of intervention being ineffective for most of the coded behaviors. Further, alignment of many safety events could not be determined due to limited reported information. This highlights a need to design more systematic, behavior-informed approaches to reporting PSEs and identifying interventions to effectively change behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Interprofessional Crisis Simulation Training in a Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Setting on Team Coordination: A Mixed Methods Study. 非手术室麻醉情境下跨专业危机模拟训练对团队协作的影响:一项混合方法研究。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.009
Hedwig Schroeck, Bridget Hatton, Pablo Martinez-Camblor, Michaela A Whitty, Louise Wen, Andreas H Taenzer

Background: Crisis resource management in non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) locations is challenging but can potentially be improved through interprofessional crisis simulation training (ICST). This mixed methods study aimed to evaluate the effect of a one-time training on team coordination in diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging locations.

Methods: Personnel from anesthesia, radiology, and perioperative services (n = 87) underwent ICST over eight months. Team coordination among participants was assessed and compared at baseline, immediately after, and at three months after ICST using a validated instrument-the relational coordination index (RCI)-and a questionnaire on role perceptions and task confidence. Open-ended interviews on a purposive sample of participants were conducted before and after training and analyzed for recurring themes.

Results: Response rates for the RCI were 71.3% at baseline, 65.5% immediately after, and 36.8% three months after training. For subjects responding at baseline and at the respective post-training time point, there were no statistically significant differences in composite RCI scores immediately after or at three months after ICST. However, some individual RCI domain scores increased from baseline to three months after training. For instance, mutual respect increased from (mean ± standard deviation) 3.67 ± 0.49 to 4.42 ± 0.67 (p = 0.003) among non-anesthesia personnel rating anesthesia personnel; and shared knowledge rose from 3.58 ± 0.79 to 4.08 ± 0.51 (p = 0.010) among non-anesthesia personnel rating anesthesia personnel. Thematic analysis from 15 interviews revealed increased familiarity with roles and crisis procedures after ICST as well as improved communication.

Conclusion: A single interprofessional crisis simulation training in a NORA setting, though it did not change overall relational coordination scores, had positive effects on some aspects of team coordination by improving role clarity, task confidence, trust, and communication.

背景:非手术室麻醉(NORA)场所的危机资源管理具有挑战性,但可以通过跨专业危机模拟培训(ICST)来改善。这项混合方法的研究旨在评估一次性培训对诊断和介入磁共振成像位置团队协调的影响。方法:来自麻醉、放射学和围手术期服务的人员(n = 87)接受了超过8个月的ICST。使用一种有效的工具——关系协调指数(RCI)和一份关于角色认知和任务信心的问卷,评估和比较了参与者之间的团队协调,并在ICST后的基线、立即和三个月进行了比较。在培训前后对有目的的参与者样本进行了开放式访谈,并分析了反复出现的主题。结果:RCI的有效率在基线时为71.3%,训练后立即为65.5%,训练后三个月为36.8%。对于在基线和各自的训练后时间点有反应的受试者,在ICST后立即或三个月的综合RCI评分没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,一些个体RCI域得分从基线到训练后三个月有所增加。例如,非麻醉人员对麻醉人员的相互尊重从(平均±标准差)3.67±0.49增加到4.42±0.67 (p = 0.003);非麻醉人员对麻醉人员的知识共享从3.58±0.79上升到4.08±0.51 (p = 0.010)。15次访谈的专题分析显示,在信息技术支助之后,对角色和危机处理程序的熟悉程度有所提高,沟通也有所改善。结论:在NORA环境下的单一跨专业危机模拟训练,虽然没有改变整体的关系协调得分,但通过提高角色清晰度、任务信心、信任和沟通,对团队协调的某些方面有积极的影响。
{"title":"Effect of Interprofessional Crisis Simulation Training in a Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Setting on Team Coordination: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Hedwig Schroeck, Bridget Hatton, Pablo Martinez-Camblor, Michaela A Whitty, Louise Wen, Andreas H Taenzer","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crisis resource management in non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) locations is challenging but can potentially be improved through interprofessional crisis simulation training (ICST). This mixed methods study aimed to evaluate the effect of a one-time training on team coordination in diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging locations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Personnel from anesthesia, radiology, and perioperative services (n = 87) underwent ICST over eight months. Team coordination among participants was assessed and compared at baseline, immediately after, and at three months after ICST using a validated instrument-the relational coordination index (RCI)-and a questionnaire on role perceptions and task confidence. Open-ended interviews on a purposive sample of participants were conducted before and after training and analyzed for recurring themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates for the RCI were 71.3% at baseline, 65.5% immediately after, and 36.8% three months after training. For subjects responding at baseline and at the respective post-training time point, there were no statistically significant differences in composite RCI scores immediately after or at three months after ICST. However, some individual RCI domain scores increased from baseline to three months after training. For instance, mutual respect increased from (mean ± standard deviation) 3.67 ± 0.49 to 4.42 ± 0.67 (p = 0.003) among non-anesthesia personnel rating anesthesia personnel; and shared knowledge rose from 3.58 ± 0.79 to 4.08 ± 0.51 (p = 0.010) among non-anesthesia personnel rating anesthesia personnel. Thematic analysis from 15 interviews revealed increased familiarity with roles and crisis procedures after ICST as well as improved communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single interprofessional crisis simulation training in a NORA setting, though it did not change overall relational coordination scores, had positive effects on some aspects of team coordination by improving role clarity, task confidence, trust, and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"115-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of a Cohort Structure on Grantee Experiences Developing Clinical Quality Measures for Diagnostic Excellence. 队列结构对开发卓越诊断临床质量措施的受助人经验的影响。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.008
Abigail T Evans, Meridith Eastman, Mujahed Khan, Jeffrey J Geppert, Lydia Stewart-Artz

Background: Diagnostic errors are harmful and pervasive. The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation funded the Diagnostic Excellence Initiative (Initiative) to support the development of clinical quality measures needed to inform quality improvement efforts in medical diagnosis. The Initiative leverages a unique cohort structure that combines technical assistance and cohort activities to foster innovation in groups of grantees. This manuscript shares grantee perspectives on their participation in these unique cohorts.

Methods: The authors conducted interviews with 16 Initiative grantees to understand how technical assistance and cohort activities affected their measure development process. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using deductive codes.

Results: Grantees reported technical assistance and cohort activities provided as part of the Initiative effectively supported them in developing clinical quality measures. Technical assistance, including one-on-one technical support and work plans, helped meet project milestones and address implementation challenges. Grantees valued cohort activities, including office hours and in-person meetings, because they gave grantees the opportunity to connect with other measure developers and gain new perspectives on their work. Further, grantees reported learning about the measure development process and indicated participation in an Initiative cohort had positive effects on their careers.

Conclusion: Grantees believed the combination of technical assistance and cohort activities provided by the Initiative supported their ability to develop diagnostic quality measures. This suggests collaborative learning activities like those provided to grantees could effectively support other complex problems in health care.

背景:诊断错误是有害的和普遍的。戈登和贝蒂·摩尔基金会资助了卓越诊断倡议(倡议),以支持制定必要的临床质量措施,为医疗诊断质量改进工作提供信息。该计划利用一种独特的队列结构,将技术援助和队列活动结合起来,促进受赠款群体的创新。这份手稿分享了他们参与这些独特队列的受让人的观点。方法:作者对16个计划受助人进行了访谈,以了解技术援助和队列活动如何影响他们的测量开发过程。访谈用演绎代码进行记录、转录和编码。结果:受资助者报告了作为该计划的一部分提供的技术援助和队列活动有效地支持了他们制定临床质量措施。技术援助,包括一对一的技术支持和工作计划,帮助实现了项目里程碑并解决了实施方面的挑战。受让人重视群体活动,包括办公时间和面对面的会议,因为它们给了受让人与其他度量开发人员联系的机会,并获得了他们工作的新视角。此外,受资助者报告了对测量开发过程的了解,并表示参与倡议队列对他们的职业生涯有积极的影响。结论:受资助者认为,该计划提供的技术援助和队列活动的结合支持了他们开发诊断质量措施的能力。这表明,向受助人提供的协作学习活动可以有效地支持医疗保健中的其他复杂问题。
{"title":"The Impact of a Cohort Structure on Grantee Experiences Developing Clinical Quality Measures for Diagnostic Excellence.","authors":"Abigail T Evans, Meridith Eastman, Mujahed Khan, Jeffrey J Geppert, Lydia Stewart-Artz","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic errors are harmful and pervasive. The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation funded the Diagnostic Excellence Initiative (Initiative) to support the development of clinical quality measures needed to inform quality improvement efforts in medical diagnosis. The Initiative leverages a unique cohort structure that combines technical assistance and cohort activities to foster innovation in groups of grantees. This manuscript shares grantee perspectives on their participation in these unique cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted interviews with 16 Initiative grantees to understand how technical assistance and cohort activities affected their measure development process. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using deductive codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grantees reported technical assistance and cohort activities provided as part of the Initiative effectively supported them in developing clinical quality measures. Technical assistance, including one-on-one technical support and work plans, helped meet project milestones and address implementation challenges. Grantees valued cohort activities, including office hours and in-person meetings, because they gave grantees the opportunity to connect with other measure developers and gain new perspectives on their work. Further, grantees reported learning about the measure development process and indicated participation in an Initiative cohort had positive effects on their careers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Grantees believed the combination of technical assistance and cohort activities provided by the Initiative supported their ability to develop diagnostic quality measures. This suggests collaborative learning activities like those provided to grantees could effectively support other complex problems in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing and Sustaining Clinical Outcomes in 88 US Hospitals Post-Pandemic: A Quality Improvement Initiative. 优化和维持88家美国医院大流行后的临床结果:质量改进倡议。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.010
Mohamad G Fakih, Florian Daragjati, Lisa K Sturm, Collin Miller, Betsy McKenzie, Kelly Randall, Frederick A Masoudi, Jamie Moxham, Subhangi Ghosh, Jyothi Karthik Raja, Allison Bollinger, Stacy Garrett-Ray, Maureen Chadwick, Thomas Aloia, Richard Fogel

Background: Optimizing outcomes of hospitalized patients anchors on standardizing processes in medical management, interventions to reduce the risk of decompensation, and prompt intervention when a patient decompensates.

Methods: A quality improvement initiative (optimized sepsis and respiratory compromise management, reducing health care-associated infection and medication risk, swift management of the deteriorating patient, feedback on performance, and accountability) was implemented in a multistate health system. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included health care-associated infections, patient-days with hypoglycemic and severe hyperglycemic episodes, and hospital onset (HO) acute kidney injury (AKI).

Results: A total of 2,015,408 patients were admitted to 88 hospitals over the 36-month study period. Overall mortality improved from the baseline observed/expected (O/E) of 0.97 in 2021 to 0.74 in 2023 (-23.4%; 4,186 fewer deaths, p < 0.001). Controlling for baseline (2021) mortality O/E ratios, the mean mortality O/E ratio for 2023 was 0.74 for system and 0.84 for peers, representing a difference of -0.10 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12 - -0.07], with 1,807 fewer deaths). The standardized infection ratio declined for central line-associated blood stream infections by 24.8% (0.58; 88 fewer events), catheter-associated urinary tract infections by 30.6% (0.44; 98 fewer events), HO methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia by 29.0% (0.72; 67 fewer events), and HO Clostridioides difficile infection by 35.1% (0.36; 311 fewer events) in 2023 compared to 2021. HO AKI episodes dropped by 6.2% (8.6%; 1,725 fewer events), and patient-days with hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia decreased by 5.8% (4.0%; 4,840 fewer events) and 22.8% (5.2%; 30,065 fewer events), respectively.

Conclusion: This systemwide initiative focusing on standardizing processes, feedback on performance, and accountability was associated with sustainable improvements in mortality and a reduction in infectious and safety events.

背景:优化住院患者的预后取决于医疗管理流程的规范化、降低失代偿风险的干预措施以及患者失代偿时的及时干预。方法:在一个多州卫生系统中实施了一项质量改进计划(优化败血症和呼吸系统损害管理,减少卫生保健相关感染和用药风险,迅速管理恶化患者,反馈绩效和问责制)。主要终点是经风险调整后的住院死亡率。次要结局包括卫生保健相关感染、低血糖和严重高血糖发作的患者日数,以及住院发作(HO)急性肾损伤(AKI)。结果:在36个月的研究期间,共有2,015,408名患者入住88家医院。总体死亡率从2021年的基线观察/预期(O/E) 0.97提高到2023年的0.74 (-23.4%;死亡人数减少4186人,p < 0.001)。控制基线(2021年)死亡率O/E比,2023年系统的平均死亡率O/E比为0.74,同行为0.84,差异为-0.10 (p < 0.001, 95%置信区间[CI] 0.12 - -0.07],死亡人数减少1807人)。中心线相关血流感染的标准化感染率下降了24.8% (0.58;导尿管相关性尿路感染减少30.6% (0.44;耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症减少29.0% (0.72;难辨梭菌感染减少了35.1% (0.36;与2021年相比,2023年将减少311起事件。HO AKI发生率下降6.2% (8.6%;发生低血糖和严重高血糖的患者日数减少了5.8% (4.0%;减少4840次)和22.8% (5.2%;减少了30,065个事件)。结论:这一全系统的倡议侧重于标准化流程、绩效反馈和问责制,与死亡率的持续改善和传染性和安全事件的减少有关。
{"title":"Optimizing and Sustaining Clinical Outcomes in 88 US Hospitals Post-Pandemic: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Mohamad G Fakih, Florian Daragjati, Lisa K Sturm, Collin Miller, Betsy McKenzie, Kelly Randall, Frederick A Masoudi, Jamie Moxham, Subhangi Ghosh, Jyothi Karthik Raja, Allison Bollinger, Stacy Garrett-Ray, Maureen Chadwick, Thomas Aloia, Richard Fogel","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing outcomes of hospitalized patients anchors on standardizing processes in medical management, interventions to reduce the risk of decompensation, and prompt intervention when a patient decompensates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quality improvement initiative (optimized sepsis and respiratory compromise management, reducing health care-associated infection and medication risk, swift management of the deteriorating patient, feedback on performance, and accountability) was implemented in a multistate health system. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included health care-associated infections, patient-days with hypoglycemic and severe hyperglycemic episodes, and hospital onset (HO) acute kidney injury (AKI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,015,408 patients were admitted to 88 hospitals over the 36-month study period. Overall mortality improved from the baseline observed/expected (O/E) of 0.97 in 2021 to 0.74 in 2023 (-23.4%; 4,186 fewer deaths, p < 0.001). Controlling for baseline (2021) mortality O/E ratios, the mean mortality O/E ratio for 2023 was 0.74 for system and 0.84 for peers, representing a difference of -0.10 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12 - -0.07], with 1,807 fewer deaths). The standardized infection ratio declined for central line-associated blood stream infections by 24.8% (0.58; 88 fewer events), catheter-associated urinary tract infections by 30.6% (0.44; 98 fewer events), HO methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia by 29.0% (0.72; 67 fewer events), and HO Clostridioides difficile infection by 35.1% (0.36; 311 fewer events) in 2023 compared to 2021. HO AKI episodes dropped by 6.2% (8.6%; 1,725 fewer events), and patient-days with hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia decreased by 5.8% (4.0%; 4,840 fewer events) and 22.8% (5.2%; 30,065 fewer events), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systemwide initiative focusing on standardizing processes, feedback on performance, and accountability was associated with sustainable improvements in mortality and a reduction in infectious and safety events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"86-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142876406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections by Leadership Focus on Process Measures. 领导层关注过程措施预防中枢线相关血流感染。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.012
Kathleen McMullen, Fran Hixson, Megan Peters, Kathryn Nelson, William Sistrunk, Jeff Reames, Cynthia Standlee, David Tannehill, Keith Starke

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected quality improvement work that was key to hospital-acquired infection (HAI) prevention efforts for many hospitals. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) standardized infection ratios (SIRs) were highly affected by the pandemic.

Methods: After seeing an increase in CLABSI SIRs through early 2021, a health care system including 12 acute care hospitals in the midwestern United States focused on processes and process measures for CLABSI prevention. Each hospital was asked to identify a medical provider, nursing, and infection prevention lead to champion the work (identified as a CLABSI triad). CLABSI triads emphasized best practice expectations, standardized technology and products, and implemented reporting and trending of compliance. Work started in July 2021, with multiple initiatives rolled out through the end of 2022. CLABSI SIRs and standardized utilization ratios (SURs) were analyzed with interrupted time series analysis; changes in several process measures were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum exact testing.

Results: A 47.5% decrease was seen in CLABSI SIR through the study period, with SIR = 0.61 from 2023 to April 2024. The slope of the trend line for CLABSI SIR and central line utilization had a significant downward trend in the intervention time frame (p = 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively). CLABSI prevention best practices improved statistically during the study period.

Conclusion: Intense focus by leadership on key CLABSI prevention process measures was associated with lower CLABSI SIRs.

背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行影响了许多医院的质量改进工作,而质量改进工作是医院获得性感染(HAI)预防工作的关键。中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)的标准化感染率(SIRs)受到了大流行的严重影响:方法:在 2021 年初 CLABSI SIR 增加之后,美国中西部的一个医疗保健系统(包括 12 家急症医院)将重点放在了 CLABSI 预防的流程和流程措施上。要求每家医院确定一名医疗服务提供者、护理人员和感染预防负责人来支持这项工作(称为 CLABSI 三人组)。CLABSI 三方小组强调最佳实践预期、标准化技术和产品,并实施合规性报告和趋势分析。这项工作于 2021 年 7 月启动,并在 2022 年底前推出多项举措。采用间断时间序列分析法对 CLABSI SIR 和标准化使用率(SUR)进行分析;采用 Wilcoxon 秩和精确检验法对几项流程措施的变化进行分析:在研究期间,CLABSI SIR 下降了 47.5%,从 2023 年到 2024 年 4 月,SIR = 0.61。在干预期间,CLABSI SIR 和中心静脉使用率的趋势线斜率呈显著下降趋势(分别为 p = 0.04 和 p < 0.01)。在研究期间,CLABSI 预防最佳实践在统计上有所改善:结论:领导层对主要 CLABSI 预防流程措施的高度重视与 CLABSI SIR 的降低有关。
{"title":"Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections by Leadership Focus on Process Measures.","authors":"Kathleen McMullen, Fran Hixson, Megan Peters, Kathryn Nelson, William Sistrunk, Jeff Reames, Cynthia Standlee, David Tannehill, Keith Starke","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected quality improvement work that was key to hospital-acquired infection (HAI) prevention efforts for many hospitals. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) standardized infection ratios (SIRs) were highly affected by the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After seeing an increase in CLABSI SIRs through early 2021, a health care system including 12 acute care hospitals in the midwestern United States focused on processes and process measures for CLABSI prevention. Each hospital was asked to identify a medical provider, nursing, and infection prevention lead to champion the work (identified as a CLABSI triad). CLABSI triads emphasized best practice expectations, standardized technology and products, and implemented reporting and trending of compliance. Work started in July 2021, with multiple initiatives rolled out through the end of 2022. CLABSI SIRs and standardized utilization ratios (SURs) were analyzed with interrupted time series analysis; changes in several process measures were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum exact testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 47.5% decrease was seen in CLABSI SIR through the study period, with SIR = 0.61 from 2023 to April 2024. The slope of the trend line for CLABSI SIR and central line utilization had a significant downward trend in the intervention time frame (p = 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively). CLABSI prevention best practices improved statistically during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intense focus by leadership on key CLABSI prevention process measures was associated with lower CLABSI SIRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"126-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
We Count Our Successes in Lives. 我们用生命来计算成功。
IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.006
Brent C James
{"title":"We Count Our Successes in Lives.","authors":"Brent C James","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":"83-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1