Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with stemless humeral component, nonspherical head, and inlay glenoid: clinical outcomes at mean 4.4-year follow-up

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2023.12.007
Brett M. Cascio MD , William S. Pietrzak PhD , Kayla DeJean BS
{"title":"Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with stemless humeral component, nonspherical head, and inlay glenoid: clinical outcomes at mean 4.4-year follow-up","authors":"Brett M. Cascio MD ,&nbsp;William S. Pietrzak PhD ,&nbsp;Kayla DeJean BS","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2023.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Limitations of traditional stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) with a spherical head and onlay glenoid include 1) inaccurate replication of native nonspherical humeral head kinematics, 2) substantial bone resection, and 3) susceptibility to glenoid loosening. Our purpose was to examine the outcomes of stemless aTSA with a nonspherical head and inlay glenoid.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty patients (63 shoulders) with end-stage glenohumeral osteoarthritis were treated by a single surgeon. The study population was limited to 22 patients/25 shoulders (13 male, 12 female; mean age 65.6 years) with 2-year minimum follow-up (mean 51.8 months) subdivided into 2 groups by age. The young group included 5 patients/5 shoulders (3 male, 2 female; mean age 52.2 years; mean follow-up 62.4 months), while the elderly group included 17 patients/20 shoulders (10 male, 10 female; mean age 68.9 years; mean follow-up 49.2 months). At the final follow-up, patient satisfaction and complications were evaluated and the Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and SF-36 scores were compared to preoperative values. First postoperative radiographs were compared to the final follow-up for signs of gross loosening, implant tilt, subsidence, and periprosthetic radiolucency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No humeral shaft fractures, infections, glenoid/humeral component loosening, radiolucencies, shoulder dislocations, or neurovascular complications were encountered. No reoperations or revisions were performed. The entire study population (25 shoulders) showed significant increases in the Constant score (47.4-82.8, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (36.9-88.1, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and all components of the SF-36 score (<em>P</em> &lt; .014) except general health perceptions (<em>P</em> = .490), role imitations (emotional) (<em>P</em> = .232), and mental health (<em>P</em> = .746), with a 95% patient satisfaction rate. There were no significant differences between the young and elderly groups in any outcomes (<em>P</em> &gt; .107).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results suggest that stemless aTSA performed with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid is a safe and effective treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis in both young and elderly patients. However, longer term studies with larger patient populations will be required for corroboration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 354-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Limitations of traditional stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) with a spherical head and onlay glenoid include 1) inaccurate replication of native nonspherical humeral head kinematics, 2) substantial bone resection, and 3) susceptibility to glenoid loosening. Our purpose was to examine the outcomes of stemless aTSA with a nonspherical head and inlay glenoid.

Methods

Sixty patients (63 shoulders) with end-stage glenohumeral osteoarthritis were treated by a single surgeon. The study population was limited to 22 patients/25 shoulders (13 male, 12 female; mean age 65.6 years) with 2-year minimum follow-up (mean 51.8 months) subdivided into 2 groups by age. The young group included 5 patients/5 shoulders (3 male, 2 female; mean age 52.2 years; mean follow-up 62.4 months), while the elderly group included 17 patients/20 shoulders (10 male, 10 female; mean age 68.9 years; mean follow-up 49.2 months). At the final follow-up, patient satisfaction and complications were evaluated and the Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and SF-36 scores were compared to preoperative values. First postoperative radiographs were compared to the final follow-up for signs of gross loosening, implant tilt, subsidence, and periprosthetic radiolucency.

Results

No humeral shaft fractures, infections, glenoid/humeral component loosening, radiolucencies, shoulder dislocations, or neurovascular complications were encountered. No reoperations or revisions were performed. The entire study population (25 shoulders) showed significant increases in the Constant score (47.4-82.8, P < .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (36.9-88.1, P < .001), and all components of the SF-36 score (P < .014) except general health perceptions (P = .490), role imitations (emotional) (P = .232), and mental health (P = .746), with a 95% patient satisfaction rate. There were no significant differences between the young and elderly groups in any outcomes (P > .107).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that stemless aTSA performed with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid is a safe and effective treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis in both young and elderly patients. However, longer term studies with larger patient populations will be required for corroboration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用无柄肱骨组件、非球形头和镶嵌式盂成形术的解剖型全肩关节成形术:平均随访 4.4 年的临床结果
背景采用球形头和镶嵌式盂的传统有柄解剖全肩关节成形术(aTSA)的局限性包括:1)不能准确复制原生非球形肱骨头运动学;2)大量骨切除;3)易发生盂松动。我们的目的是研究使用非球面肱骨头和镶嵌盂的无柄人工关节置换术的效果。研究对象仅限于 22 名患者/25 个肩关节(13 名男性,12 名女性;平均年龄 65.6 岁),随访最短 2 年(平均 51.8 个月),按年龄分为两组。年轻组包括 5 名患者/5 个肩膀(3 名男性,2 名女性;平均年龄 52.2 岁;平均随访时间 62.4 个月),而老年组包括 17 名患者/20 个肩膀(10 名男性,10 名女性;平均年龄 68.9 岁;平均随访时间 49.2 个月)。在最后的随访中,对患者的满意度和并发症进行了评估,并将 Constant-Murley、American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons 和 SF-36 评分与术前值进行了比较。术后首次拍片与最后随访时的照片进行比较,以观察是否有大面积松动、植入物倾斜、下沉和假体周围放射性白斑等迹象。结果未出现肱骨轴骨折、感染、盂/肱骨组件松动、放射性白斑、肩关节脱位或神经血管并发症。没有进行再次手术或翻修。所有研究对象(25 个肩关节)的常量评分(47.4-82.8,P < .001)、美国肩肘外科医生评分(36.9-88.1,P < .001)和 SF-36 评分的所有组成部分(P < .014)均有显著提高,但一般健康感知(P = .490)、角色模仿(情感)(P = .232)和心理健康(P = .746)除外,患者满意率为 95%。结论我们的研究结果表明,使用非球面肱骨头和镶嵌式盂体的无柄肱骨头肩关节置换术是治疗年轻和老年肱骨关节炎的一种安全有效的方法。不过,还需要对更多患者进行更长期的研究来加以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using hybrid glenoid fixation with a porous-coated titanium post. Two- to ten-year follow-up of 256 cases with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1