The optimal cut-off values of FRAX without BMD for predicting osteoporosis fracture risk in the older adults at Nan, Thailand

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2023.12.004
Worapong Sucharitpongpan
{"title":"The optimal cut-off values of FRAX without BMD for predicting osteoporosis fracture risk in the older adults at Nan, Thailand","authors":"Worapong Sucharitpongpan","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The World Health Organization developed the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) to assess the risk of having fragility fractures in the next 10 years. The FRAX tool is different by country, race, gender, and age. This study is a community-based study aiming to identify the optimal cut-off values of FRAX for the identification of older individuals who are at high risk of osteoporosis fractures in both genders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional, analytic study was conducted by using health screening data of the older adults aged 60–90 living in the 3 biggest districts of Nan province, Thailand. Validity and optimal FRAX major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) cut-off values in both genders were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 36,042 older adults included in the study, 1624 older people had a history of fragility fractures. Older females were 3.2 and 2.5 times more likely to have fragility fractures and hip fractures than males, respectively. The optimal cut-off values of FRAX MOF for predicting fragility fractures were 3.0% for males and 6.3% for females. The optimal cut-off values of FRAX HF for predicting hip fractures were 1.1% for males and 3.3% for females.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A simple screening tool like the FRAX which is available in the annual health screening activities has the potential to be used to predict the risk of developing fragility fractures in rural areas of Thailand. Different cut-off values should be used in females and males because the risk of MOF and HF of both genders is significantly different.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525524000013/pdfft?md5=26ec65c1dc2730e0b698d2b8e46608b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2405525524000013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525524000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The World Health Organization developed the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) to assess the risk of having fragility fractures in the next 10 years. The FRAX tool is different by country, race, gender, and age. This study is a community-based study aiming to identify the optimal cut-off values of FRAX for the identification of older individuals who are at high risk of osteoporosis fractures in both genders.

Methods

This cross-sectional, analytic study was conducted by using health screening data of the older adults aged 60–90 living in the 3 biggest districts of Nan province, Thailand. Validity and optimal FRAX major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) cut-off values in both genders were determined.

Results

Of 36,042 older adults included in the study, 1624 older people had a history of fragility fractures. Older females were 3.2 and 2.5 times more likely to have fragility fractures and hip fractures than males, respectively. The optimal cut-off values of FRAX MOF for predicting fragility fractures were 3.0% for males and 6.3% for females. The optimal cut-off values of FRAX HF for predicting hip fractures were 1.1% for males and 3.3% for females.

Conclusions

A simple screening tool like the FRAX which is available in the annual health screening activities has the potential to be used to predict the risk of developing fragility fractures in rural areas of Thailand. Different cut-off values should be used in females and males because the risk of MOF and HF of both genders is significantly different.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测泰国南部老年人骨质疏松症骨折风险的 FRAX(无 BMD)最佳临界值
目标世界卫生组织开发了骨折风险评估工具(FRAX),用于评估未来 10 年内发生脆性骨折的风险。FRAX工具因国家、种族、性别和年龄而异。本研究是一项以社区为基础的研究,旨在确定 FRAX 的最佳临界值,以识别出骨质疏松症骨折高风险的老年人(男女均有)。 方法:本研究采用横断面分析法,通过对居住在泰国南部省 3 个最大地区的 60-90 岁老年人的健康检查数据进行分析。结果 在纳入研究的 36042 名老年人中,1624 名老年人有脆性骨折史。老年女性发生脆性骨折和髋部骨折的几率分别是男性的 3.2 倍和 2.5 倍。FRAX MOF 预测脆性骨折的最佳临界值男性为 3.0%,女性为 6.3%。结论像 FRAX 这样简单的筛查工具可在每年的健康检查活动中使用,有潜力用于预测泰国农村地区发生脆性骨折的风险。由于女性和男性罹患脆性骨折和高频骨折的风险有显著差异,因此女性和男性应采用不同的临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Does intradiscal steroid injection accelerate the histological degeneration of the human disc? Surgery for spinal deformity with osteoporosis: Achieving successful fusion Verification of grip strength as an evaluation tool for locomotive syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis Effects of whole-body vibration on bone properties in type 2 diabetes model rats Choice of cemented or uncemented stems for displaced femoral neck fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1