Measurement of focal plane error in laser powder bed fusion machines

IF 4.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Additive manufacturing letters Pub Date : 2024-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100196
Jaime Berez , Enea Dushaj , Elliott Jost , Christopher Saldaña , Katherine Fu
{"title":"Measurement of focal plane error in laser powder bed fusion machines","authors":"Jaime Berez ,&nbsp;Enea Dushaj ,&nbsp;Elliott Jost ,&nbsp;Christopher Saldaña ,&nbsp;Katherine Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Amongst the many sub-systems that make up laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) machines, the optomechanical sub-system stands out due to its potential for off-nominal performance but incommensurate level of study on performance evaluation. Nominally, the optomechanical system focuses the laser onto a planar field which is at a controlled position and orientation relative to the powder bed. Deviations from this assumed condition, sometimes referred to as defocus or focus offset, have the potential to significantly impact the manufacturing process by influencing the energy intensity at the process zone. Herein, a novel, high-throughput, low-cost, artifact-based methodology to measure focus offset is detailed. In a single continuous build process, tracks at varying offsets from the build plane were created by ablating the coating on discrete coupons located throughout the build area. By examining these track widths, the focus offset was determined at a relatively fine spatial resolution over the build space, down to 25 mm intervals along the <em>x</em> and <em>y</em> directions, thus ascertaining the discrepancy between the laser focal plane and the build plane, i.e., focal plane error. Results were found to agree with reference measurements to within 0.27 mm over the entire build space and defocus levels ranging from approximately -1.6 to 1.7 mm were discovered. Field sag and optomechanical misalignment were the major casual factors. It is concluded that similar or more severe levels of defocus may be present in the typical PBF-LB machine, which may impart considerable impacts to the overall PBF-LB process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000057/pdfft?md5=48a3f31fc042735e2d8a34b4e8a71267&pid=1-s2.0-S2772369024000057-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amongst the many sub-systems that make up laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) machines, the optomechanical sub-system stands out due to its potential for off-nominal performance but incommensurate level of study on performance evaluation. Nominally, the optomechanical system focuses the laser onto a planar field which is at a controlled position and orientation relative to the powder bed. Deviations from this assumed condition, sometimes referred to as defocus or focus offset, have the potential to significantly impact the manufacturing process by influencing the energy intensity at the process zone. Herein, a novel, high-throughput, low-cost, artifact-based methodology to measure focus offset is detailed. In a single continuous build process, tracks at varying offsets from the build plane were created by ablating the coating on discrete coupons located throughout the build area. By examining these track widths, the focus offset was determined at a relatively fine spatial resolution over the build space, down to 25 mm intervals along the x and y directions, thus ascertaining the discrepancy between the laser focal plane and the build plane, i.e., focal plane error. Results were found to agree with reference measurements to within 0.27 mm over the entire build space and defocus levels ranging from approximately -1.6 to 1.7 mm were discovered. Field sag and optomechanical misalignment were the major casual factors. It is concluded that similar or more severe levels of defocus may be present in the typical PBF-LB machine, which may impart considerable impacts to the overall PBF-LB process.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光粉末床熔融机焦平面误差的测量
在组成激光粉末床熔融(PBF-LB)设备的众多子系统中,光学机械子系统脱颖而出,因为它有可能产生非标定性能,但对性能评估的研究水平却与之不相称。名义上,光学机械系统将激光聚焦到一个平面场上,该平面场相对于粉末床的位置和方向是受控的。与这一假设条件的偏差(有时称为离焦或聚焦偏移)可能会影响加工区的能量强度,从而对制造工艺产生重大影响。本文详细介绍了一种新型、高通量、低成本、基于人工制品的焦点偏移测量方法。在单个连续构建过程中,通过烧蚀位于整个构建区域的离散试样上的涂层,从构建平面产生不同偏移的轨迹。通过检查这些轨迹宽度,以相对较高的空间分辨率确定了整个构建空间的焦点偏移量,沿 x 和 y 方向的偏移量最小为 25 毫米,从而确定了激光焦平面和构建平面之间的差异,即焦平面误差。结果发现,在整个构建空间内,与参考测量值的吻合度在 0.27 毫米以内,并且发现离焦水平大约在-1.6 至 1.7 毫米之间。视场下垂和光学机械偏差是主要的偶然因素。结论是在典型的 PBF-LB 机器中可能存在类似或更严重的离焦水平,这可能会对整个 PBF-LB 过程产生相当大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing letters
Additive manufacturing letters Materials Science (General), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
期刊最新文献
Modelling process monitoring data in laser powder bed fusion: A pragmatic route to additive manufacturing quality assurance Drop-on-demand 3D printing of programable magnetic composites for soft robotics In-situ heating TEM observation of solidification cell evolutions in an Al-Fe alloy built by laser-powder bed fusion A non-melting additive approach to structural repair of aluminum aircraft fastener holes Enabling tailored microstructures by hybrid directed energy deposition processing of a nickel-based superalloy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1