Comparative evaluation of remineralization potential of four different remineralization agents on human enamel: An in vitro study

Giftlin Denny Xavier, George Thomas, Sunil Jose, V. J. Vivek, Kanimozhi Selvam, Ashish Ramakrishnan
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of remineralization potential of four different remineralization agents on human enamel: An in vitro study","authors":"Giftlin Denny Xavier, George Thomas, Sunil Jose, V. J. Vivek, Kanimozhi Selvam, Ashish Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.4103/jcde.jcde_113_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The study aimed to assess the remineralizing potential of four different commercially available agents using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, and Vickers Microhardness (VMH) Test.\n \n \n \n Forty-four specimens (n = 11 per group) were prepared from extracted teeth. A window of 6 mm × 4 mm was made on all the specimens that represented three zones, namely, sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and remineralized enamel. The zone for demineralized enamel was subjected to four different remineralizing agents; casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF), tricalcium phosphate fluoride (TCP-F), calcium sucrose phosphate (CSP), and self-assembling peptide (P11-4). Remineralization (REM) was assessed using VMH; the structural changes were assessed using SEM that was analyzed using EDX analysis. The specimens were subjected to a newer regimen of demineralization. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used with a level of significance at P ≤ 0.05.\n \n \n \n There were no significant differences in VMH between the groups for sound enamel (P = 0.472) and demineralized enamel (P = 0.116). VMH was statistically significantly more for P11-4 and the least for CPP-ACPF (P = 0.011). A post hoc analysis revealed higher VMH for P11-4 compared to CPP-ACPF (P = 0.014) and TCP-F (P = 0.035). SEM showed a homogeneous layer of minerals for all groups except CPP-ACPF. TCP-F reported a higher degree of REM, followed by P11-4 as assessed using EDX analysis.\n \n \n \n Self-assembling peptide (P11-4) exhibited a higher degree of REM than other remineralizing agents followed by CSP.\n","PeriodicalId":516572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":"232 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_113_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the remineralizing potential of four different commercially available agents using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, and Vickers Microhardness (VMH) Test. Forty-four specimens (n = 11 per group) were prepared from extracted teeth. A window of 6 mm × 4 mm was made on all the specimens that represented three zones, namely, sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and remineralized enamel. The zone for demineralized enamel was subjected to four different remineralizing agents; casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF), tricalcium phosphate fluoride (TCP-F), calcium sucrose phosphate (CSP), and self-assembling peptide (P11-4). Remineralization (REM) was assessed using VMH; the structural changes were assessed using SEM that was analyzed using EDX analysis. The specimens were subjected to a newer regimen of demineralization. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used with a level of significance at P ≤ 0.05. There were no significant differences in VMH between the groups for sound enamel (P = 0.472) and demineralized enamel (P = 0.116). VMH was statistically significantly more for P11-4 and the least for CPP-ACPF (P = 0.011). A post hoc analysis revealed higher VMH for P11-4 compared to CPP-ACPF (P = 0.014) and TCP-F (P = 0.035). SEM showed a homogeneous layer of minerals for all groups except CPP-ACPF. TCP-F reported a higher degree of REM, followed by P11-4 as assessed using EDX analysis. Self-assembling peptide (P11-4) exhibited a higher degree of REM than other remineralizing agents followed by CSP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种不同再矿化剂对人体珐琅质再矿化潜力的比较评估:体外研究
该研究旨在使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、能量色散 X 射线(EDX)分析和维氏硬度(VMH)测试评估四种不同市售制剂的再矿化潜力。 从拔出的牙齿上制备了 44 个标本(每组 11 个)。在所有试样上开出一个 6 mm × 4 mm 的窗口,代表三个区域,即健全釉质、脱矿釉质和再矿化釉质。脱矿釉质区使用了四种不同的再矿化剂:酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙氟化物(CPP-ACPF)、磷酸三钙氟化物(TCP-F)、蔗糖磷酸钙(CSP)和自组装肽(P11-4)。使用 VMH 评估再矿化 (REM);使用扫描电镜评估结构变化,并使用 EDX 分析。对标本进行了较新的脱矿化处理。采用单因素方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验,显著性水平为 P ≤0.05。 健全釉质(P = 0.472)和脱矿釉质(P = 0.116)组间的 VMH 无明显差异。在统计学上,P11-4 的 VMH 明显更高,而 CPP-ACPF 的 VMH 最低(P = 0.011)。事后分析显示,P11-4 的 VMH 比 CPP-ACPF (P = 0.014)和 TCP-F (P = 0.035)高。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)显示,除 CPP-ACPF 外,所有组的矿物质层都很均匀。根据 EDX 分析,TCP-F 的 REM 程度更高,其次是 P11-4。 与其他再矿化剂相比,自组装肽(P11-4)的再矿化程度更高,其次是 CSP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of incorporation of ferrule in premolars endocrown designs to check any alterations in their fracture resistance: A pilot study Effect of blood and artificial saliva contamination on marginal adaptation and sealing ability of different retrograde filling materials: A comparative analysis Enriched advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus gold nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis for its potential use in revascularization for necrotic immature permanent teeth Does increase in temperature of sodium hypochlorite have enhanced antimicrobial efficacy and tissue dissolution property? – A systematic review and meta-regression An in vitro comparative evaluation of efficiency of three rotary nickel–titanium file systems in terms of remaining dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1