Market manipulation of Cryptocurrencies: Evidence from Social Media and Transaction Data

IF 3.9 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Internet Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1145/3643812
Li Wen, Lingfeng Bao, Jiachi Chen, John Grundy, Xin Xia, Xiaohu Yang
{"title":"Market manipulation of Cryptocurrencies: Evidence from Social Media and Transaction Data","authors":"Li Wen, Lingfeng Bao, Jiachi Chen, John Grundy, Xin Xia, Xiaohu Yang","doi":"10.1145/3643812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cryptocurrency market cap experienced a great increase in recent years. However, large price fluctuations demonstrate the need for governance structures and identify whether there are market manipulations. In this paper, we conducted three analyses – social media data analysis, blockchain data analysis, and price bubble analysis – to investigate whether market manipulation exists on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin platforms. Social media data analysis aims to find the reasons for the price fluctuations. Blockchain data analysis is used to find the detailed behavior of the manipulators. Price bubble analysis is used to investigate the relation between price fluctuation and manipulators’ behavior. By using the three analyses, we show that market manipulation exists on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin. However, market manipulation of Bitcoin is limited, and for most of Bitcoin’s price fluctuations, we found other explanations. The price for Ethereum is most sensitive to technical updates. Technical companies/teams usually hype some new concepts, e.g., ICO, DeFi, which causes a price spike. The price of Dogecoin has a high correlation with Elon Musk’s Twitter activity, which shows influential individuals have the ability to manipulate its prices. Also, the poor monetary liquidity of Dogecoin allows some users to manipulate its price.</p>","PeriodicalId":50911,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Internet Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Internet Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3643812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market cap experienced a great increase in recent years. However, large price fluctuations demonstrate the need for governance structures and identify whether there are market manipulations. In this paper, we conducted three analyses – social media data analysis, blockchain data analysis, and price bubble analysis – to investigate whether market manipulation exists on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin platforms. Social media data analysis aims to find the reasons for the price fluctuations. Blockchain data analysis is used to find the detailed behavior of the manipulators. Price bubble analysis is used to investigate the relation between price fluctuation and manipulators’ behavior. By using the three analyses, we show that market manipulation exists on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin. However, market manipulation of Bitcoin is limited, and for most of Bitcoin’s price fluctuations, we found other explanations. The price for Ethereum is most sensitive to technical updates. Technical companies/teams usually hype some new concepts, e.g., ICO, DeFi, which causes a price spike. The price of Dogecoin has a high correlation with Elon Musk’s Twitter activity, which shows influential individuals have the ability to manipulate its prices. Also, the poor monetary liquidity of Dogecoin allows some users to manipulate its price.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加密货币的市场操纵:来自社交媒体和交易数据的证据
近年来,加密货币的市值经历了大幅增长。然而,价格的大幅波动表明需要建立治理结构,并识别是否存在市场操纵行为。在本文中,我们通过社交媒体数据分析、区块链数据分析和价格泡沫分析这三种分析方法来研究比特币、以太坊和 Dogecoin 平台是否存在市场操纵行为。社交媒体数据分析旨在找出价格波动的原因。区块链数据分析用于发现操纵者的详细行为。价格泡沫分析用于研究价格波动与操纵者行为之间的关系。通过这三种分析,我们发现比特币、以太坊和 Dogecoin 都存在市场操纵行为。然而,对比特币的市场操纵是有限的,对于比特币的大部分价格波动,我们找到了其他解释。以太坊的价格对技术更新最为敏感。技术公司/团队通常会炒作一些新概念,如 ICO、DeFi,从而导致价格飙升。Dogecoin 的价格与 Elon Musk 的 Twitter 活动高度相关,这表明有影响力的个人有能力操纵其价格。此外,由于 Dogecoin 的货币流动性较差,一些用户可以操纵其价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.90%
发文量
137
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) brings together many computing disciplines including computer software engineering, computer programming languages, middleware, database management, security, knowledge discovery and data mining, networking and distributed systems, communications, performance and scalability etc. TOIT will cover the results and roles of the individual disciplines and the relationshipsamong them.
期刊最新文献
Interpersonal Communication Interconnection in Media Convergence Metaverse Using Reinforcement Learning and Error Models for Drone Precision Landing Towards Human-AI Teaming to Mitigate Alert Fatigue in Security Operations Centres RESP: A Recursive Clustering Approach for Edge Server Placement in Mobile Edge Computing OTI-IoT: A Blockchain-based Operational Threat Intelligence Framework for Multi-vector DDoS Attacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1