Limitations of 14-Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sampling for Assessment of Hypoglycemia and Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1089/dia.2023.0476
Halis Kaan Akturk
{"title":"Limitations of 14-Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sampling for Assessment of Hypoglycemia and Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Halis Kaan Akturk","doi":"10.1089/dia.2023.0476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become the standard of care in diabetes management with the recent advances in technology and accessibility in the last decade. An International Consensus was established to define CGM metrics and its goals in diabetes care. The 2019 International Consensus suggested 14 days of CGM sampling for the assessment of CGM metrics stating the limitations that may occur for hypoglycemia and glycemic variability metrics. Since then, several studies assessed the correlation between CGM metrics and duration of the sampling period. This review summarized the studies that investigated the relationship between 14-day CGM sampling to 90-day CGM data in >70% CGM users for all CGM metrics and highlighted possible solutions for more accurate CGM sampling durations in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Accumulating evidence showed that 14-day CGM sampling correlates well with 90-day CGM data for mean glucose, time in 70-180 mg/dL, and hyperglycemia metrics; however, it correlates weakly for hypoglycemia and glycemic variability metrics. In the studies included in this review, in adults with T1D, minimum sampling duration was 14 days for mean glucose, time in 70-180 mg/dL, and time in hyperglycemia (>180 and >250 mg/dL); however, minimum sampling duration varied between 21 to 30 days for time <70 mg/dL, 30 to 35 days for time <54 mg/dL, and 28 to 35 days for coefficient of variation. Longer than 14 days of CGM, sampling was required to properly assess hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in T1D.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"503-508"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become the standard of care in diabetes management with the recent advances in technology and accessibility in the last decade. An International Consensus was established to define CGM metrics and its goals in diabetes care. The 2019 International Consensus suggested 14 days of CGM sampling for the assessment of CGM metrics stating the limitations that may occur for hypoglycemia and glycemic variability metrics. Since then, several studies assessed the correlation between CGM metrics and duration of the sampling period. This review summarized the studies that investigated the relationship between 14-day CGM sampling to 90-day CGM data in >70% CGM users for all CGM metrics and highlighted possible solutions for more accurate CGM sampling durations in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Accumulating evidence showed that 14-day CGM sampling correlates well with 90-day CGM data for mean glucose, time in 70-180 mg/dL, and hyperglycemia metrics; however, it correlates weakly for hypoglycemia and glycemic variability metrics. In the studies included in this review, in adults with T1D, minimum sampling duration was 14 days for mean glucose, time in 70-180 mg/dL, and time in hyperglycemia (>180 and >250 mg/dL); however, minimum sampling duration varied between 21 to 30 days for time <70 mg/dL, 30 to 35 days for time <54 mg/dL, and 28 to 35 days for coefficient of variation. Longer than 14 days of CGM, sampling was required to properly assess hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in T1D.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
14 天 CGM 采样在评估 1 型糖尿病患者低血糖和血糖变异性方面的局限性。
近十年来,随着技术的进步和普及,连续血糖监测(CGM)已成为糖尿病治疗的标准。为定义 CGM 指标及其在糖尿病护理中的目标,达成了一项国际共识。2019 年的国际共识建议对 CGM 指标进行 14 天的采样评估,并指出了低血糖和血糖变异性指标可能出现的局限性。此后,多项研究评估了 CGM 指标与采样时间长短之间的相关性。本综述总结了对 14 天 CGM 采样与 90 天 CGM 数据之间关系的研究,这些研究针对的是大于 70% 的 CGM 用户的所有 CGM 指标,并强调了在 1 型糖尿病患者中提高 CGM 采样持续时间准确性的可能解决方案。累积的证据表明,14 天 CGM 采样与 90 天 CGM 数据在平均血糖、70-180 mg/dL 时间和高血糖指标方面的相关性较好;但在低血糖和血糖变异性指标方面的相关性较弱。在本综述所包含的研究中,1 型糖尿病成人患者的平均血糖、70-180 毫克/分升时间和高血糖时间(>180 和 >250 毫克/分升)的采样持续时间最短为 14 天,而低血糖时间和血糖变异性指标的采样持续时间最短为 21 至 30 天不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Support a Carbohydrate-Restricted Nutrition Intervention in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Comparison of Computational Statistical Packages for the Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data with a Reference Software, "Ambulatory Glucose Profile," in Type 1 Diabetes. Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial. Evaluation of an Automated Priming Bolus for Improving Prandial Glucose Control in Full Closed Loop Delivery. Safe Options for the Treatment of Mothers and Babies with Pregestational Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1