Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Electrodiagnostic Severity is Not Associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity.

Dafang Zhang, Brandon E Earp, Philip Blazar
{"title":"Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Electrodiagnostic Severity is Not Associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity.","authors":"Dafang Zhang, Brandon E Earp, Philip Blazar","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between preoperative electrodiagnostic study (EDS) parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments in patients with EDS-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study of 45 patients with EDS-confirmed CTS was conducted. Patients completed the PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Explanatory variables included EDS disease severity (mild, moderate and severe), sensory peak latency, sensory amplitude, motor latency, motor amplitude, the presence of nonrecordable sensory latency and the presence of nonrecordable sensory amplitude. Explanatory variables also included patient-related factors, such as age, sex and diabetes mellitus. Associations between variables were assessed using simple linear regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's <i>t</i>-test. <b>Results:</b> In our cohort, the EDS severity was mild in 38%, moderate in 42% and severe in 20% of patients. The mean PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 44.4, the mean PROMIS Pain Interference score was 53.5 and the mean PROMIS Pain Intensity score was 49.9. Bivariate analysis demonstrated no association between EDS severity overall or any EDS parameter individually and PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Diabetes mellitus was associated with poorer PROMIS Upper Extremity scores. <b>Conclusions:</b> EDS severity is not associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Carpal tunnel release is commonly indicated for pain and dysfunction, but validated measures of pain and dysfunction do not correlate with EDS severity. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between preoperative electrodiagnostic study (EDS) parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments in patients with EDS-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: A retrospective study of 45 patients with EDS-confirmed CTS was conducted. Patients completed the PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Explanatory variables included EDS disease severity (mild, moderate and severe), sensory peak latency, sensory amplitude, motor latency, motor amplitude, the presence of nonrecordable sensory latency and the presence of nonrecordable sensory amplitude. Explanatory variables also included patient-related factors, such as age, sex and diabetes mellitus. Associations between variables were assessed using simple linear regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test. Results: In our cohort, the EDS severity was mild in 38%, moderate in 42% and severe in 20% of patients. The mean PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 44.4, the mean PROMIS Pain Interference score was 53.5 and the mean PROMIS Pain Intensity score was 49.9. Bivariate analysis demonstrated no association between EDS severity overall or any EDS parameter individually and PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Diabetes mellitus was associated with poorer PROMIS Upper Extremity scores. Conclusions: EDS severity is not associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Carpal tunnel release is commonly indicated for pain and dysfunction, but validated measures of pain and dysfunction do not correlate with EDS severity. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腕管综合征电诊断严重程度与 PROMIS 上肢、PROMIS 疼痛干扰和 PROMIS 疼痛强度无关。
研究背景本研究的主要目的是确定经 EDS 证实的腕管综合征(CTS)患者术前电诊断研究(EDS)参数与患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)工具之间的关联。研究方法:对 45 名经 EDS 证实的腕管综合征患者进行回顾性研究。患者填写了 PROMIS 上肢、PROMIS 疼痛干扰和 PROMIS 疼痛强度。解释变量包括 EDS 疾病严重程度(轻度、中度和重度)、感觉峰值潜伏期、感觉振幅、运动潜伏期、运动振幅、是否存在无法记录的感觉潜伏期以及是否存在无法记录的感觉振幅。解释变量还包括患者相关因素,如年龄、性别和糖尿病。采用简单线性回归、方差分析(ANOVA)和学生 t 检验评估变量之间的关联。结果在我们的队列中,38% 的患者 EDS 严重程度为轻度,42% 为中度,20% 为重度。PROMIS 上肢评分的平均值为 44.4,PROMIS 疼痛干扰评分的平均值为 53.5,PROMIS 疼痛强度评分的平均值为 49.9。双变量分析表明,EDS总体严重程度或任何EDS参数与PROMIS上肢评分、PROMIS疼痛干扰评分和PROMIS疼痛强度评分之间均无关联。糖尿病与 PROMIS 上肢评分较差有关。结论EDS严重程度与PROMIS上肢评分、PROMIS疼痛干扰评分和PROMIS疼痛强度评分无关。腕管松解术通常适用于疼痛和功能障碍,但疼痛和功能障碍的有效测量指标与 EDS 严重程度无关。证据等级:三级(诊断)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
期刊最新文献
A 7-Year Retrospective Review of Flexor Sheath Infections. An Updated Survey of Trends in the Surgical Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis - The Increasing Popularity of the Suture Suspension Arthroplasty. Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Arthrography for Wrist Ligamentous Injuries - A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon Location in Various Functional Hand Positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1