Justice and moral economies in “Modular, Adaptive, and Decentralized” (MAD) water systems

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Water Security Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.wasec.2023.100148
Melissa Beresford , Alexandra Brewis , Neetu Choudhary , Georgina Drew , Nataly Escobedo Garcia , Dustin Garrick , Mohammed Jobayer Hossain , Ernesto Lopez , Elisabeth Ilboudo Nébié , Raul Pacheco-Vega , Anaís Roque , Amber Wutich
{"title":"Justice and moral economies in “Modular, Adaptive, and Decentralized” (MAD) water systems","authors":"Melissa Beresford ,&nbsp;Alexandra Brewis ,&nbsp;Neetu Choudhary ,&nbsp;Georgina Drew ,&nbsp;Nataly Escobedo Garcia ,&nbsp;Dustin Garrick ,&nbsp;Mohammed Jobayer Hossain ,&nbsp;Ernesto Lopez ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Ilboudo Nébié ,&nbsp;Raul Pacheco-Vega ,&nbsp;Anaís Roque ,&nbsp;Amber Wutich","doi":"10.1016/j.wasec.2023.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>“MAD Water” systems (<u>m</u>odular, <u>a</u>daptive, <u>d</u>ecentralized infrastructures) will expand to meet human water needs under future climate change, migration, and urbanization scenarios. Yet the use of MAD systems often undermines water justice. Here we argue that identifying and analyzing <em>moral economies for water</em> can allow scholars to understand—and possibly predict—when and why justice in MAD water systems is upheld, breaks down, or becomes unstable. Moral economies are institutional arrangements in which shared understandings of justice normatively regulate the distribution and exchange of basic resources. We review the moral economies concept, explain an operational framework for analyzing moral economies, and use this framework to illustrate how moral economies function to uphold justice (or not) within three types of MAD water systems today: water sharing arrangements, informal water vending markets, and small-scale water commons. We show that when moral economies are embedded and operating successfully in MAD water systems, they can create check-and-balance mechanisms against injustice. But when moral economies are absent or failing, water injustices often prevail. The moral economies framework therefore provides not only a tool for theory building and analysis, but also a possible language and pathway for communities to organize for justice. We conclude by outlining key areas for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37308,"journal":{"name":"Water Security","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312423000160/pdfft?md5=432121e1b3c3aadb7cfc31af5bf9ca32&pid=1-s2.0-S2468312423000160-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312423000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“MAD Water” systems (modular, adaptive, decentralized infrastructures) will expand to meet human water needs under future climate change, migration, and urbanization scenarios. Yet the use of MAD systems often undermines water justice. Here we argue that identifying and analyzing moral economies for water can allow scholars to understand—and possibly predict—when and why justice in MAD water systems is upheld, breaks down, or becomes unstable. Moral economies are institutional arrangements in which shared understandings of justice normatively regulate the distribution and exchange of basic resources. We review the moral economies concept, explain an operational framework for analyzing moral economies, and use this framework to illustrate how moral economies function to uphold justice (or not) within three types of MAD water systems today: water sharing arrangements, informal water vending markets, and small-scale water commons. We show that when moral economies are embedded and operating successfully in MAD water systems, they can create check-and-balance mechanisms against injustice. But when moral economies are absent or failing, water injustices often prevail. The moral economies framework therefore provides not only a tool for theory building and analysis, but also a possible language and pathway for communities to organize for justice. We conclude by outlining key areas for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模块化、适应性和分散式"(MAD)供水系统中的正义与道德经济
在未来气候变化、人口迁移和城市化的情况下,"MAD 水 "系统(模块化、适应性强、分散式基础设施)将不断扩大,以满足人类的用水需求。然而,"MAD 水 "系统的使用往往会破坏水资源的公正性。在此,我们认为,识别和分析水资源的道德经济可以让学者们了解--并在可能的情况下预测--MAD 水资源系统中的正义何时以及为何得到维护、瓦解或变得不稳定。道德经济是一种制度安排,其中对正义的共同理解规范着基本资源的分配和交换。我们回顾了道德经济的概念,解释了分析道德经济的操作框架,并利用这一框架说明了道德经济如何在当今三种类型的马德西水务系统中发挥维护(或不维护)正义的作用:水共享安排、非正规水贩卖市场和小规模水公共资源。我们的研究表明,当道德经济嵌入并成功运行于 MAD 水资源系统中时,它们可以建立制衡机制,防止不公正现象的发生。但当道德经济缺失或失效时,水不公正现象往往会盛行。因此,道德经济框架不仅为理论建设和分析提供了工具,也为社区组织起来争取正义提供了可能的语言和途径。最后,我们概述了未来研究的关键领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Security
Water Security Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Water Security aims to publish papers that contribute to a better understanding of the economic, social, biophysical, technological, and institutional influencers of current and future global water security. At the same time the journal intends to stimulate debate, backed by science, with strong interdisciplinary connections. The goal is to publish concise and timely reviews and synthesis articles about research covering the following elements of water security: -Shortage- Flooding- Governance- Health and Sanitation
期刊最新文献
Gender dimensions of water vending in LMICs: A scoping review The past, present, and future of Ghana’s WASH sector. An explorative analysis Using managed aquifer recharge to address land subsidence: Insights from a global literature review The syndemics of food and water insecurities on emotional distress and overall wellbeing in Ghana: Findings from a cross-sectional study More than Magnitude: Towards a multidimensional understanding of unprecedented weather to better support disaster management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1