Preoperative prediction of perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion with CT radiomics in gastric cancer

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100550
Yaoyao He , Miao Yang , Rong Hou , Shuangquan Ai , Tingting Nie , Jun Chen , Huaifei Hu , Xiaofang Guo , Yulin Liu , Zilong Yuan
{"title":"Preoperative prediction of perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion with CT radiomics in gastric cancer","authors":"Yaoyao He ,&nbsp;Miao Yang ,&nbsp;Rong Hou ,&nbsp;Shuangquan Ai ,&nbsp;Tingting Nie ,&nbsp;Jun Chen ,&nbsp;Huaifei Hu ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Guo ,&nbsp;Yulin Liu ,&nbsp;Zilong Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether contrast-enhanced CT radiomics features can preoperatively predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in gastric cancer (GC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 148 patients were included in the LVI group, and 143 patients were included in the PNI group. Three predictive models were constructed, including clinical, radiomics, and combined models. A nomogram was developed with clinical risk factors to predict LVI and PNI status. The predictive performance of the three models was mainly evaluated using the mean area under the curve (AUC). The performance of three predictive models was assessed concerning calibration and clinical usefulness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the LVI group, the predictive power of the combined model (AUC=0.871, 0.822) outperformed the clinical model (AUC=0.792, 0.728) and the radiomics model (AUC=0.792, 0.728) in both the training and testing cohorts. In the PNI group, the combined model (AUC=0.834, 0.828) also had better predictive power than the clinical model (AUC=0.764, 0.632) and the radiomics model (AUC=0.764, 0.632) in both the training and testing cohorts. The combined models also showed good calibration and clinical usefulness for LVI and PNI prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CECT-based radiomics analysis might serve as a non-invasive method to predict LVI and PNI status in GC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000054/pdfft?md5=79bcab4e28b787141586eeffc87751ec&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether contrast-enhanced CT radiomics features can preoperatively predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

A total of 148 patients were included in the LVI group, and 143 patients were included in the PNI group. Three predictive models were constructed, including clinical, radiomics, and combined models. A nomogram was developed with clinical risk factors to predict LVI and PNI status. The predictive performance of the three models was mainly evaluated using the mean area under the curve (AUC). The performance of three predictive models was assessed concerning calibration and clinical usefulness.

Results

In the LVI group, the predictive power of the combined model (AUC=0.871, 0.822) outperformed the clinical model (AUC=0.792, 0.728) and the radiomics model (AUC=0.792, 0.728) in both the training and testing cohorts. In the PNI group, the combined model (AUC=0.834, 0.828) also had better predictive power than the clinical model (AUC=0.764, 0.632) and the radiomics model (AUC=0.764, 0.632) in both the training and testing cohorts. The combined models also showed good calibration and clinical usefulness for LVI and PNI prediction.

Conclusion

CECT-based radiomics analysis might serve as a non-invasive method to predict LVI and PNI status in GC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 CT 放射组学预测胃癌术前神经周围和淋巴管侵犯情况
目的 探讨对比增强 CT 放射组学特征能否在术前预测胃癌(GC)的淋巴管侵犯(LVI)和神经周围侵犯(PNI)。方法 LVI 组共纳入 148 例患者,PNI 组共纳入 143 例患者。建立了三种预测模型,包括临床模型、放射组学模型和综合模型。结合临床风险因素制定了一个提名图,用于预测 LVI 和 PNI 状态。三个模型的预测性能主要通过平均曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。结果在 LVI 组中,综合模型的预测能力(AUC=0.871,0.822)在训练组和测试组中均优于临床模型(AUC=0.792,0.728)和放射组学模型(AUC=0.792,0.728)。在 PNI 组中,综合模型(AUC=0.834,0.828)在训练组和测试组中的预测能力也优于临床模型(AUC=0.764,0.632)和放射组学模型(AUC=0.764,0.632)。结论基于CECT的放射组学分析可作为一种无创方法来预测GC的LVI和PNI状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model True cost estimation of common imaging procedures for cost-effectiveness analysis - insights from a Singapore hospital emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1