Stress-related fluctuations in personality functioning in daily life: Pilot data from an ambulatory monitoring study in outpatients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1002/cpp.2951
Roland Sinnaeve, Ilse Van Diest, Stephan Claes, Inez Myin-Germeys, Louisa M. C. Van den Bosch, Jan Henk Kamphuis, Kristof Vansteelandt, Chris Van Hoof, Jan Cornelis, Marlies Houben
{"title":"Stress-related fluctuations in personality functioning in daily life: Pilot data from an ambulatory monitoring study in outpatients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder","authors":"Roland Sinnaeve,&nbsp;Ilse Van Diest,&nbsp;Stephan Claes,&nbsp;Inez Myin-Germeys,&nbsp;Louisa M. C. Van den Bosch,&nbsp;Jan Henk Kamphuis,&nbsp;Kristof Vansteelandt,&nbsp;Chris Van Hoof,&nbsp;Jan Cornelis,&nbsp;Marlies Houben","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This pilot study aimed to test a comprehensive experience sampling method (ESM) protocol for investigating the relationship between stress and personality functioning (PF) in the daily lives of outpatients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Participants (<i>N</i> = 22) responded to a 32-item ESM questionnaire 10 times a day for 1 week while wearing two stress detection devices. Results showed that the protocol was feasible. There was a high level of compliance (i.e. average of 85%), and no serious adverse events. The main indices, that is, Stress and PF, demonstrated acceptable to excellent internal consistency and provisional evidence for their validity. We found that 64% of the variability in PF was due to within-subject differences. Mixed modelling showed that the momentary changes in stress (<i>p</i> &lt; .001) and body position (i.e. active vs passive; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) explained an estimated 46% of this within-subject variance. We found no significant within-subject effects when we used parameters of autonomic nervous system (ANS)–activity as predictors. Data loss during recording and artefact detection of electrophysiological data were substantial but not related to momentary changes in PF. The preliminary findings suggest that PF is a volatile aspect of personality pathology and that there is a strong, concurrent relationship between stress and PF in daily life. This pilot study constitutes the first demonstration of PF fluctuations within a clinical sample and initiates an examination of their association with ANS activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2951","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to test a comprehensive experience sampling method (ESM) protocol for investigating the relationship between stress and personality functioning (PF) in the daily lives of outpatients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Participants (N = 22) responded to a 32-item ESM questionnaire 10 times a day for 1 week while wearing two stress detection devices. Results showed that the protocol was feasible. There was a high level of compliance (i.e. average of 85%), and no serious adverse events. The main indices, that is, Stress and PF, demonstrated acceptable to excellent internal consistency and provisional evidence for their validity. We found that 64% of the variability in PF was due to within-subject differences. Mixed modelling showed that the momentary changes in stress (p < .001) and body position (i.e. active vs passive; p < .001) explained an estimated 46% of this within-subject variance. We found no significant within-subject effects when we used parameters of autonomic nervous system (ANS)–activity as predictors. Data loss during recording and artefact detection of electrophysiological data were substantial but not related to momentary changes in PF. The preliminary findings suggest that PF is a volatile aspect of personality pathology and that there is a strong, concurrent relationship between stress and PF in daily life. This pilot study constitutes the first demonstration of PF fluctuations within a clinical sample and initiates an examination of their association with ANS activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常生活中与压力相关的人格功能波动:一项针对边缘型人格障碍门诊患者的流动监测研究的试点数据
这项试点研究旨在测试一种综合经验取样法(ESM)方案,以调查被诊断为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的门诊患者日常生活中的压力与人格功能(PF)之间的关系。参与者(N = 22)在佩戴两个压力检测设备的情况下,每天回答 10 次 32 个项目的 ESM 问卷,为期一周。结果表明,该方案是可行的。受试者的依从性很高(平均为 85%),而且没有发生严重的不良事件。主要指标,即压力和 PF,显示出可接受到极佳的内部一致性,并有临时证据证明其有效性。我们发现,64% 的 PF 变异是由受试者内部差异造成的。混合建模显示,压力(p < .001)和身体位置(即主动与被动;p < .001)的瞬间变化可解释约 46% 的受试者内差异。当我们使用自律神经系统(ANS)活动参数作为预测因子时,没有发现明显的受试者内效应。记录过程中的数据丢失和电生理数据的伪影检测非常严重,但与 PF 的瞬间变化无关。初步研究结果表明,PF 是人格病理学中一个不稳定的方面,而且日常生活中的压力与 PF 之间存在密切的并发关系。这项试验性研究首次在临床样本中展示了 PF 波动,并开始研究 PF 与自律神经系统活动的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
The Unified Protocol or Dialectical Behaviour Therapy? Considerations for Choosing Between Two Evidence-Based Transdiagnostic Psychotherapies for Complex Patients Intolerance of Uncertainty as a Situational Vulnerability Factor in the Context of the Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of COVID-19-Related Psychological Impacts Issue Information Role of Worry in Addiction: Implication of Metacognitive Beliefs and Type 2 Worry Effectiveness of Narrative Exposure Therapy for Treatment of PTSD Following Childhood Trauma: A Single-Case Series Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1