The CoLab-score rapidly and efficiently excludes COVID-19 at the emergency department without need for SARS-CoV-2 testing: a multicenter case-control study

Arjen-Kars Boer, Ruben Deneer, Maaike Maas, Heidi Ammerlaan, Roland H.H. van Balkom, Mathie PG Leers, Remy J.H. Martens, Madelon M. Buijs, Jos J. Kerremans, Muriël Messchaert, Jeroen D.E. van Suijlen, Natal A.W. van Riel, Volkher Scharnhorst
{"title":"The CoLab-score rapidly and efficiently excludes COVID-19 at the emergency department without need for SARS-CoV-2 testing: a multicenter case-control study","authors":"Arjen-Kars Boer, Ruben Deneer, Maaike Maas, Heidi Ammerlaan, Roland H.H. van Balkom, Mathie PG Leers, Remy J.H. Martens, Madelon M. Buijs, Jos J. Kerremans, Muriël Messchaert, Jeroen D.E. van Suijlen, Natal A.W. van Riel, Volkher Scharnhorst","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.30.24301996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background<br />Rapid identification of emergency department (ED) patients with a possible COVID-19 infection is needed. PCR-testing all ED patients is neither feasible nor effective in most centers, therefore a rapid, objective, low-cost screening tool to triage ED patients is necessary.<br />Methods<br />Results from all routine lab tests from ED patients at the Catharina Hospital were collected from July 2019 to July 2020 and used in a statistical model to obtain the CoLab-score. The score was validated temporally and externally in three independent centers.<br />Results<br />The CoLab-score consists of 10 routine lab results and can be used to safely rule-out a COVID-19 infection in more than one third of ED presentations with a negative predictive value of 0.997 (95% CI: 0.994 – 0.999) .<br />Conclusions<br />The CoLab-score is a valuable tool to rule out COVID-19, guide PCR testing and is available to any center with access to routine laboratory tests.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.30.24301996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background<br />Rapid identification of emergency department (ED) patients with a possible COVID-19 infection is needed. PCR-testing all ED patients is neither feasible nor effective in most centers, therefore a rapid, objective, low-cost screening tool to triage ED patients is necessary.<br />Methods<br />Results from all routine lab tests from ED patients at the Catharina Hospital were collected from July 2019 to July 2020 and used in a statistical model to obtain the CoLab-score. The score was validated temporally and externally in three independent centers.<br />Results<br />The CoLab-score consists of 10 routine lab results and can be used to safely rule-out a COVID-19 infection in more than one third of ED presentations with a negative predictive value of 0.997 (95% CI: 0.994 – 0.999) .<br />Conclusions<br />The CoLab-score is a valuable tool to rule out COVID-19, guide PCR testing and is available to any center with access to routine laboratory tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项多中心病例对照研究:CoLab-评分可在急诊科快速有效地排除 COVID-19,而无需进行 SARS-CoV-2 检测
背景<br />需要快速识别可能感染 COVID-19 的急诊科(ED)患者。在大多数中心,对所有急诊科患者进行 PCR 检测既不可行也不有效,因此需要一种快速、客观、低成本的筛查工具来分流急诊科患者。<br />方法<br />从 2019 年 7 月到 2020 年 7 月,收集了 Catharina 医院急诊科患者的所有常规实验室检测结果,并将其用于统计模型以获得 CoLab 评分。该评分在三个独立中心进行了时间和外部验证。<br />结果<br />CoLab-评分由 10 项常规化验结果组成,可用于在三分之一以上的急诊室就诊者中安全排除 COVID-19 感染,其阴性预测值为 0.997(95% CI:0.994 - 0.999)。<br />结论<br />CoLab-score是排除COVID-19、指导PCR检测的重要工具,可用于任何可进行常规实验室检测的中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-hospital stay of anemic patients (70-90 g.L-1) in the ED with/without transfusion: a single-center propensity-matched study. Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study What strategies are used to select patients for direct admission under acute medicine services? A systematic review of the literature. Feasibility of mixed-reality telecollaboration to enhance pre-medical student shadowing education Evaluating the Impact of NHS Strikes on Patient Flow through Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1