What strategies are used to select patients for direct admission under acute medicine services? A systematic review of the literature.

Samuel Evans, Catherine Atkin, Austin Hunt, Georgina Ball, Charlotte Cassidy, Alexander Costley-White, Rebecca Wilding, Elizabeth Sapey
{"title":"What strategies are used to select patients for direct admission under acute medicine services? A systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Samuel Evans, Catherine Atkin, Austin Hunt, Georgina Ball, Charlotte Cassidy, Alexander Costley-White, Rebecca Wilding, Elizabeth Sapey","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pressures on hospital emergency care services have led to increasing interest in new models of acute care provision. One such model is a medical emergency department where medical patients are triaged directly to acute internal medicine, without assessment by emergency medicine. The evidence for this model of care is unclear. Design: Systematic review. Methods: Studies included direct referral pathways to acute internal medicine. The protocol was registered prospectively (Prospero: CRD42023495786). Databases searched included MEDLINE (Ovid), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE in process, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase. Studies had no time or language restrictions. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed by at least two independent researchers. ROBINS I risk of bias assessment was applied to the selected studies and a narrative synthesis was performed. Results: From 4405 abstracts, 89 full text articles were screened and 4 were selected for data extraction. Two studies assessed tools to predict the need for a medical admission and two studies assessed the impact of direct referral pathways to medicine. Risk of bias was mixed, and studies were heterogeneous. However, the studies reported a good ability to appropriately select patients for direct referral to medicine and a reduced length of time to medical assessment. There were no differences in other outcomes such as mortality or overall length of stay. Discussion: The current evidence to support direct admission to medicine, effectively a medical ED, is limited with studies being heterogeneous and of varying quality. Models for patient selection varied, but there was evidence to support accurate, early identification of medical patients and of reduced delays in medical assessment and care. Conclusion: Given these positive early signs of benefit, more studies are needed to design and evaluate care models such as medical EDs. Registration: Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023495786.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressures on hospital emergency care services have led to increasing interest in new models of acute care provision. One such model is a medical emergency department where medical patients are triaged directly to acute internal medicine, without assessment by emergency medicine. The evidence for this model of care is unclear. Design: Systematic review. Methods: Studies included direct referral pathways to acute internal medicine. The protocol was registered prospectively (Prospero: CRD42023495786). Databases searched included MEDLINE (Ovid), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE in process, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase. Studies had no time or language restrictions. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed by at least two independent researchers. ROBINS I risk of bias assessment was applied to the selected studies and a narrative synthesis was performed. Results: From 4405 abstracts, 89 full text articles were screened and 4 were selected for data extraction. Two studies assessed tools to predict the need for a medical admission and two studies assessed the impact of direct referral pathways to medicine. Risk of bias was mixed, and studies were heterogeneous. However, the studies reported a good ability to appropriately select patients for direct referral to medicine and a reduced length of time to medical assessment. There were no differences in other outcomes such as mortality or overall length of stay. Discussion: The current evidence to support direct admission to medicine, effectively a medical ED, is limited with studies being heterogeneous and of varying quality. Models for patient selection varied, but there was evidence to support accurate, early identification of medical patients and of reduced delays in medical assessment and care. Conclusion: Given these positive early signs of benefit, more studies are needed to design and evaluate care models such as medical EDs. Registration: Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023495786.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急症医学服务中选择直接入院病人的策略是什么?文献系统回顾。
背景:由于医院急诊服务所面临的压力,人们对提供急诊服务的新模式越来越感兴趣。其中一种模式是设立内科急诊室,将内科病人直接分流到急诊内科,而无需急诊医学科进行评估。这种医疗模式的证据尚不明确。设计:系统回顾。方法:研究包括直接转诊至急诊内科的途径。研究方案进行了前瞻性注册(Prospero:CRD42023495786)。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心 (CENTRAL)、MEDLINE in process、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Embase。研究没有时间或语言限制。研究根据纳入和排除标准进行筛选,并由至少两名独立研究人员进行评估。对所选研究进行 ROBINS I 偏倚风险评估,并进行叙述性综合。结果:从 4405 篇摘要中筛选出 89 篇全文,并选择了 4 篇进行数据提取。两项研究评估了预测入院医疗需求的工具,两项研究评估了直接转诊途径对医疗的影响。偏倚风险参差不齐,研究内容也不尽相同。不过,这些研究报告称,适当选择患者直接转诊至医疗机构的能力很强,而且医疗评估的时间也缩短了。死亡率或总住院时间等其他结果没有差异。讨论:目前支持直接转诊至内科(实际上是内科急诊室)的证据有限,研究内容不尽相同,质量也参差不齐。选择病人的模式各不相同,但有证据支持准确、早期识别内科病人,并减少医疗评估和护理的延误。结论:鉴于这些积极的早期获益迹象,需要更多的研究来设计和评估医疗 ED 等护理模式。注册:Prospero 注册号:CRD42023495786。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-hospital stay of anemic patients (70-90 g.L-1) in the ED with/without transfusion: a single-center propensity-matched study. Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study What strategies are used to select patients for direct admission under acute medicine services? A systematic review of the literature. Feasibility of mixed-reality telecollaboration to enhance pre-medical student shadowing education Evaluating the Impact of NHS Strikes on Patient Flow through Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1