Limonene Enantiomeric Ratios from Anthropogenic and Biogenic Emission Sources

IF 8.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ. Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00794
Shan Gu, Wentai Luo, Avisa Charmchi, Kevin J. McWhirter, Todd Rosenstiel, James Pankow and Celia L. Faiola*, 
{"title":"Limonene Enantiomeric Ratios from Anthropogenic and Biogenic Emission Sources","authors":"Shan Gu,&nbsp;Wentai Luo,&nbsp;Avisa Charmchi,&nbsp;Kevin J. McWhirter,&nbsp;Todd Rosenstiel,&nbsp;James Pankow and Celia L. Faiola*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Emissions from volatile chemical products (VCPs) have been identified as contributors to air quality degradation in urban areas. Limonene can be a tracer compound for VCPs containing fragrances in densely populated regions, but limonene is also emitted from conifers that are planted in urban areas. This creates challenges for using limonene to estimate VCP emissions. In this study, the −/+ enantiomeric ratios of limonene from VCP and conifer emission sources were quantified to evaluate if this measurement could be used to aid in source apportionment and emission inventory development. Samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph equipped with a chiral column and mass spectrometry. The results demonstrate that limonene exhibits distinct enantiomeric ratios when sourced from VCPs versus conifers. (+)-Limonene was dominant in VCP sources (&gt;97%), which was not universally true for conifer sources. The results were compared to those of air samples collected outside at two locations and indoors. The levels of (−)-limonene in outdoor air in Irvine and Portland and in indoor air were 50%, 22%, and 4%, respectively. This suggests outdoor limonene had both VCP and plant emission sources while indoor air was dominated by VCP sources. This study demonstrates the potential utility of enantiomeric analysis for improving VCP emission estimates in urban areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00794","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emissions from volatile chemical products (VCPs) have been identified as contributors to air quality degradation in urban areas. Limonene can be a tracer compound for VCPs containing fragrances in densely populated regions, but limonene is also emitted from conifers that are planted in urban areas. This creates challenges for using limonene to estimate VCP emissions. In this study, the −/+ enantiomeric ratios of limonene from VCP and conifer emission sources were quantified to evaluate if this measurement could be used to aid in source apportionment and emission inventory development. Samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph equipped with a chiral column and mass spectrometry. The results demonstrate that limonene exhibits distinct enantiomeric ratios when sourced from VCPs versus conifers. (+)-Limonene was dominant in VCP sources (>97%), which was not universally true for conifer sources. The results were compared to those of air samples collected outside at two locations and indoors. The levels of (−)-limonene in outdoor air in Irvine and Portland and in indoor air were 50%, 22%, and 4%, respectively. This suggests outdoor limonene had both VCP and plant emission sources while indoor air was dominated by VCP sources. This study demonstrates the potential utility of enantiomeric analysis for improving VCP emission estimates in urban areas.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人为和生物排放源的柠檬烯对映体比率
挥发性化学产品(VCPs)的排放已被确定为导致城市地区空气质量恶化的因素。在人口稠密地区,柠檬烯可以作为含有香料的 VCP 的示踪化合物,但在城市地区种植的针叶树也会排放柠檬烯。这给使用柠檬烯估算 VCP 排放量带来了挑战。在本研究中,我们对来自 VCP 和针叶树排放源的柠檬烯的 -/+ 对映异构体比率进行了量化,以评估这种测量方法是否可用于帮助进行源分配和制定排放清单。样品使用配备手性色谱柱和质谱仪的气相色谱仪进行分析。结果表明,当来源于 VCPs 和针叶树时,柠檬烯显示出不同的对映体比率。在 VCP 来源中,(+)-柠檬烯占主导地位(97%),而针叶树来源中的(+)-柠檬烯并不普遍。研究结果与在两个地点采集的室外和室内空气样本进行了比较。尔湾和波特兰室外空气和室内空气中的(-)-柠檬烯含量分别为 50%、22% 和 4%。这表明室外的柠檬烯既有 VCP 排放源,也有植物排放源,而室内空气则以 VCP 排放源为主。这项研究证明了对映体分析在改进城市地区 VCP 排放估算方面的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ. ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Landfill Gas: A Major Pathway for Neutral Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Release New Insights into the Mechanism of the UV/Sulfite Process: Formation of SO2•– Radicals and Their Derivatives under Acidic Conditions Comment on “Size-Resolved Elemental Composition of Respiratory Particles in Three Healthy Subjects”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1