Environmentally sustainable kidney care through transplantation: Current status and future challenges

{"title":"Environmentally sustainable kidney care through transplantation: Current status and future challenges","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The environmental impact of healthcare is an issue currently examined with increased scrutiny and on a global scale with multiple stakeholders seeking to identify the appropriate interventions to reduce it. Interestingly, a significant portion of healthcare's environmental impact stems from intensive modalities of treatment for chronic disease. There is no better example than End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), where dialysis or transplantation are the modalities of treatment offered to the vast majority of these patients. Kidney transplantation<span> (KTx) offers a longer life expectancy and improved quality of life<span> in comparison to dialysis. Cost-effectiveness analyses have proven its financial superiority, as well. PubMed and EMBASE literature search using keywords “kidney transplantation”, “carbon footprint”, “sustainability” showed that there is no published work in the field of environmental sustainability in kidney transplantation. Relevant literature was identified for surgical services and applied to transplantation. Assuming its environmental superiority to dialysis, maximising KTx rate would be an important action towards “green” renal care services. That could be achieved through living organ donation, systematic use of machine perfusion for extended criteria deceased donors and individualised immune </span></span></span>risk stratification techniques. All these measures aim towards implementing enhanced recovery protocols and two vital steps can be taken towards assessing their value. The first step is a detailed audit of the environmental impact of these novel techniques and secondly their impact in reducing the length of hospital stay and its subsequent environmental impact. Another key element is delivering appropriate post-operative care, substituting </span>allograft<span> biopsy with non-invasive techniques and reducing physical outpatient follow-up, using telemedicine. The gap in quantifying KTx services environmental impact needs to be addressed urgently, with development of strategies within the multidisciplinary transplant team. Introducing novel technologies can lead to donor pool expansion and improved organ utilisation rates, transforming transplant services in “green” hubs.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 4","pages":"Pages 233-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X2400012X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environmental impact of healthcare is an issue currently examined with increased scrutiny and on a global scale with multiple stakeholders seeking to identify the appropriate interventions to reduce it. Interestingly, a significant portion of healthcare's environmental impact stems from intensive modalities of treatment for chronic disease. There is no better example than End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), where dialysis or transplantation are the modalities of treatment offered to the vast majority of these patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) offers a longer life expectancy and improved quality of life in comparison to dialysis. Cost-effectiveness analyses have proven its financial superiority, as well. PubMed and EMBASE literature search using keywords “kidney transplantation”, “carbon footprint”, “sustainability” showed that there is no published work in the field of environmental sustainability in kidney transplantation. Relevant literature was identified for surgical services and applied to transplantation. Assuming its environmental superiority to dialysis, maximising KTx rate would be an important action towards “green” renal care services. That could be achieved through living organ donation, systematic use of machine perfusion for extended criteria deceased donors and individualised immune risk stratification techniques. All these measures aim towards implementing enhanced recovery protocols and two vital steps can be taken towards assessing their value. The first step is a detailed audit of the environmental impact of these novel techniques and secondly their impact in reducing the length of hospital stay and its subsequent environmental impact. Another key element is delivering appropriate post-operative care, substituting allograft biopsy with non-invasive techniques and reducing physical outpatient follow-up, using telemedicine. The gap in quantifying KTx services environmental impact needs to be addressed urgently, with development of strategies within the multidisciplinary transplant team. Introducing novel technologies can lead to donor pool expansion and improved organ utilisation rates, transforming transplant services in “green” hubs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过移植实现环境可持续的肾脏护理:现状与未来挑战
医疗保健对环境的影响是一个目前在全球范围内越来越受到关注的问题,多个利益相关方都在寻求适当的干预措施来减少对环境的影响。有趣的是,医疗保健对环境的影响很大一部分源于慢性病的密集治疗方式。最好的例子莫过于终末期肾病(ESRD),透析或移植是绝大多数患者的治疗方式。与透析相比,肾移植(KTx)能延长患者的预期寿命,提高生活质量。成本效益分析也证明了其经济上的优越性。使用关键词 "肾移植"、"碳足迹"、"可持续发展 "在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 上进行文献检索,结果显示在肾移植的环境可持续发展领域还没有公开发表的文献。我们找到了外科服务的相关文献,并将其应用到移植手术中。假设肾移植在环境方面优于透析,那么最大限度地提高肾移植率将是实现 "绿色 "肾脏护理服务的重要行动。这可以通过活体器官捐献、系统性地使用机器灌注延长已故捐献者的标准以及个性化的免疫风险分层技术来实现。所有这些措施都旨在实施强化的恢复方案,可以采取两个重要步骤来评估其价值。第一步是详细审核这些新技术对环境的影响,第二步是审核它们对缩短住院时间及其对环境的影响。另一个关键因素是提供适当的术后护理,用无创技术替代异体移植活检,利用远程医疗减少门诊随访。在量化 KTx 服务对环境的影响方面存在差距,亟需通过在多学科移植团队内部制定战略来加以解决。引进新技术可以扩大供体库,提高器官利用率,从而改变 "绿色 "中心的移植服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1