Interspecific interactions disrupted by roads

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1111/brv.13061
Pablo Quiles, Rafael Barrientos
{"title":"Interspecific interactions disrupted by roads","authors":"Pablo Quiles,&nbsp;Rafael Barrientos","doi":"10.1111/brv.13061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roads have pervasive impacts on wildlife, including habitat loss and fragmentation, road mortality, habitat pollution and increased human use of habitats surrounding them. However, the effects of roads on interspecific interactions are less understood. Here we provide a synthesis of the existing literature on how species interactions may be disrupted by roads, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest avenues for future research and conservation management. We conducted a systematic search using the <i>Web of Science</i> database for each species interaction (predation, competition, mutualism, parasitism, commensalism and amensalism). These searches yielded 2144 articles, of which 195 were relevant to our topic. Most of these studies focused on predation (50%) or competition (24%), and less frequently on mutualism (17%) or, parasitism (9%). We found no studies on commensalism or amensalism. Studies were biased towards mammals from high-income countries, with most conducted in the USA (34%) or Canada (18%). Our literature review identified several patterns. First, roads disrupt predator–prey relationships, usually with negative impacts on prey populations. Second, new disturbed habitats created in road corridors often benefit more competitive species, such as invasive species, although some native or endangered species can also thrive there. Third, roads degrade mutualistic interactions like seed dispersal and pollination. Fourth, roads can increase parasitism rates, although the intensity of the alteration is species specific. To reduce the negative impacts of roads on interspecific interactions, we suggest the following management actions: (<i>i</i>) verges should be as wide and heterogenous as possible, as this increases microhabitat diversity, thus enhancing ecosystem services like pollination and seed dispersal; (<i>ii</i>) combining different mowing regimes can increase the complexity of the habitat corridor, enabling it to act as a habitat for more species; (<i>iii</i>) the use of de-icing salts should be gradually reduced and replaced with less harmful products or maintenance practices; (<i>iv</i>) wildlife passes should be implemented in groups to reduce animal concentrations inside them; (<i>v</i>) periodic removal of carcasses from the road to reduce the use of this resource by wildlife; and (<i>vi</i>) implementation of traffic-calming schemes could enhance interspecific interactions like pollination and avoid disruption of predator–prey relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"99 3","pages":"1121-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roads have pervasive impacts on wildlife, including habitat loss and fragmentation, road mortality, habitat pollution and increased human use of habitats surrounding them. However, the effects of roads on interspecific interactions are less understood. Here we provide a synthesis of the existing literature on how species interactions may be disrupted by roads, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest avenues for future research and conservation management. We conducted a systematic search using the Web of Science database for each species interaction (predation, competition, mutualism, parasitism, commensalism and amensalism). These searches yielded 2144 articles, of which 195 were relevant to our topic. Most of these studies focused on predation (50%) or competition (24%), and less frequently on mutualism (17%) or, parasitism (9%). We found no studies on commensalism or amensalism. Studies were biased towards mammals from high-income countries, with most conducted in the USA (34%) or Canada (18%). Our literature review identified several patterns. First, roads disrupt predator–prey relationships, usually with negative impacts on prey populations. Second, new disturbed habitats created in road corridors often benefit more competitive species, such as invasive species, although some native or endangered species can also thrive there. Third, roads degrade mutualistic interactions like seed dispersal and pollination. Fourth, roads can increase parasitism rates, although the intensity of the alteration is species specific. To reduce the negative impacts of roads on interspecific interactions, we suggest the following management actions: (i) verges should be as wide and heterogenous as possible, as this increases microhabitat diversity, thus enhancing ecosystem services like pollination and seed dispersal; (ii) combining different mowing regimes can increase the complexity of the habitat corridor, enabling it to act as a habitat for more species; (iii) the use of de-icing salts should be gradually reduced and replaced with less harmful products or maintenance practices; (iv) wildlife passes should be implemented in groups to reduce animal concentrations inside them; (v) periodic removal of carcasses from the road to reduce the use of this resource by wildlife; and (vi) implementation of traffic-calming schemes could enhance interspecific interactions like pollination and avoid disruption of predator–prey relationships.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道路破坏了种间互动。
道路对野生动物的影响无处不在,包括栖息地丧失和破碎化、道路死亡、栖息地污染以及人类对道路周围栖息地的使用增加。然而,人们对道路对物种间相互作用的影响了解较少。在此,我们综述了有关道路如何破坏物种间相互作用的现有文献,找出了知识差距,并提出了未来研究和保护管理的途径。我们利用科学网数据库对每种物种相互作用(捕食、竞争、互惠、寄生、共生和同生)进行了系统检索。这些搜索共获得 2144 篇文章,其中 195 篇与我们的主题相关。这些研究大多关注捕食(50%)或竞争(24%),较少关注互利(17%)或寄生(9%)。我们没有发现关于共生或同生的研究。研究偏重于高收入国家的哺乳动物,大部分研究在美国(34%)或加拿大(18%)进行。我们的文献综述发现了几种模式。首先,道路破坏了捕食者与猎物之间的关系,通常会对猎物种群造成负面影响。其次,在道路走廊中形成的新的受干扰栖息地通常有利于更具竞争力的物种,如入侵物种,尽管一些本地或濒危物种也能在那里繁衍生息。第三,道路会削弱种子传播和授粉等互惠互动。第四,道路会增加寄生率,但改变的程度因物种而异。为减少道路对物种间相互作用的负面影响,我们建议采取以下管理措施:(i) 护坡应尽可能宽阔和多样化,因为这可增加微生境的多样性,从而增强生态系统服务,如授粉和种子传播;(ii) 结合不同的修剪制度可增加生境走廊的复杂性,使其成为更多物种的栖息地;(iii) 应逐步减少除冰盐的使用,代之以危害较小的产品或维护方法;(iv)野生动物通道应分组实施,以减少通道内动物的集中;(v)定期清除道路上的尸体,以减少野生动物对这一资源的利用;以及(vi)实施交通管制计划可加强物种间的相互作用,如授粉,并避免破坏捕食者与猎物之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
期刊最新文献
Towards ecosystem-based techniques for tipping point detection. Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion. Testosterone mediates life-history trade-offs in female mammals. Zooming in the plastisphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton-plastic interactions in aquatic ecosystems. Archaeocytes in sponges: simple cells of complicated fate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1