The impact of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17539447241227287
Mehrbod Vakhshoori, Niloofar Bondariyan, Sadeq Sabouhi, Keivan Kiani, Nazanin Alaei Faradonbeh, Sayed Ali Emami, Mehrnaz Shakarami, Farbod Khanizadeh, Shahin Sanaei, Niloofaralsadat Motamedi, Davood Shafie
{"title":"The impact of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mehrbod Vakhshoori, Niloofar Bondariyan, Sadeq Sabouhi, Keivan Kiani, Nazanin Alaei Faradonbeh, Sayed Ali Emami, Mehrnaz Shakarami, Farbod Khanizadeh, Shahin Sanaei, Niloofaralsadat Motamedi, Davood Shafie","doi":"10.1177/17539447241227287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammation has been suggested to play a role in heart failure (HF) pathogenesis. However, the role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as a novel biomarker, to assess HF prognosis needs to be investigated. We sought to evaluate the impact of PLR on HF clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>English-published records in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web-of-science databases were screened until December 2023. Relevant articles evaluated PLR with clinical outcomes (including mortality, rehospitalization, HF worsening, and HF detection) were recruited, with PLR difference analysis based on death/survival status in total and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21 articles (<i>n</i> = 13,924) were selected. The total mean age was 70.36 ± 12.88 years (males: 61.72%). Mean PLR was 165.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 154.69-176.38]. In total, 18 articles (<i>n</i> = 10,084) reported mortality [either follow-up (PLR: 162.55, 95% CI: 149.35-175.75) or in-hospital (PLR: 192.83, 95% CI: 150.06-235.61) death rate] and the mean PLR was 166.68 (95% CI: 154.87-178.50). Further analysis revealed PLR was significantly lower in survived HF patients rather than deceased group (152.34, 95% CI: 134.01-170.68 <i>versus</i> 194.73, 95% CI: 175.60-213.85, standard mean difference: -0.592, 95% CI: -0.857 to -0.326, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for HFrEF patients. PLR failed to show any association with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05, <i>p</i> = 0.289). Analysis of other aforementioned outcomes was not possible due to the presence of few studies of interest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PLR should be used with caution for prognosis assessment in HF sufferers and other studies are necessary to explore the exact association.</p>","PeriodicalId":23035,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447241227287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inflammation has been suggested to play a role in heart failure (HF) pathogenesis. However, the role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as a novel biomarker, to assess HF prognosis needs to be investigated. We sought to evaluate the impact of PLR on HF clinical outcomes.

Methods: English-published records in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web-of-science databases were screened until December 2023. Relevant articles evaluated PLR with clinical outcomes (including mortality, rehospitalization, HF worsening, and HF detection) were recruited, with PLR difference analysis based on death/survival status in total and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients.

Results: In total, 21 articles (n = 13,924) were selected. The total mean age was 70.36 ± 12.88 years (males: 61.72%). Mean PLR was 165.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 154.69-176.38]. In total, 18 articles (n = 10,084) reported mortality [either follow-up (PLR: 162.55, 95% CI: 149.35-175.75) or in-hospital (PLR: 192.83, 95% CI: 150.06-235.61) death rate] and the mean PLR was 166.68 (95% CI: 154.87-178.50). Further analysis revealed PLR was significantly lower in survived HF patients rather than deceased group (152.34, 95% CI: 134.01-170.68 versus 194.73, 95% CI: 175.60-213.85, standard mean difference: -0.592, 95% CI: -0.857 to -0.326, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for HFrEF patients. PLR failed to show any association with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05, p = 0.289). Analysis of other aforementioned outcomes was not possible due to the presence of few studies of interest.

Conclusion: PLR should be used with caution for prognosis assessment in HF sufferers and other studies are necessary to explore the exact association.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血小板淋巴细胞比值对心力衰竭临床预后的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:炎症被认为在心力衰竭(HF)发病机制中发挥作用。然而,血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为一种新型生物标志物,在评估心力衰竭预后方面的作用还有待研究。我们试图评估血小板淋巴细胞比值对高血压临床预后的影响:筛选了截至 2023 年 12 月在 PubMed/Medline、Scopus 和 Web-of-science 数据库中发表的英文记录。结果:共收集到21篇文章(n=0.1)对PLR与临床结局(包括死亡率、再住院、HF恶化和HF检测)进行了评估,并根据射血分数降低的HF(HFrEF)患者的死亡/存活状态对PLR进行了差异分析:共选取了 21 篇文章(n = 13,924 人)。总平均年龄为 70.36 ± 12.88 岁(男性:61.72%)。平均 PLR 为 165.54 [95% 置信区间 (CI):154.69-176.38]。共有18篇文章(n = 10,084)报告了死亡率[随访死亡率(PLR:162.55,95% CI:149.35-175.75)或院内死亡率(PLR:192.83,95% CI:150.06-235.61)],平均PLR为166.68(95% CI:154.87-178.50)。进一步分析表明,存活的 HF 患者的 PLR 明显低于死亡组(152.34,95% CI:134.01-170.68 对 194.73,95% CI:175.60-213.85,标准平均差:-0.592,95% CI:-0.857 至 -0.326,P = 0.289)。由于感兴趣的研究较少,因此无法对上述其他结果进行分析:结论:在评估高血压患者的预后时应谨慎使用 PLR,有必要开展其他研究来探讨两者之间的确切联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is aimed at clinicians and researchers from the cardiovascular disease field and will be a forum for all views and reviews relating to this discipline.Topics covered will include: ·arteriosclerosis ·cardiomyopathies ·coronary artery disease ·diabetes ·heart failure ·hypertension ·metabolic syndrome ·obesity ·peripheral arterial disease ·stroke ·arrhythmias ·genetics
期刊最新文献
Evolocumab use in clinical practice in Switzerland: final data of the observational HEYMANS cohort study. The impact of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasospastic angina: a review on diagnostic approach and management. Percutaneous image-guided management of a misplaced pericardiocentesis catheter into the inferior vena cava. Safety and potential usefulness of sequential intracoronary acetylcholine and ergonovine administration for spasm provocation testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1