Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease最新文献

This review aims to describe the sex differences in heart failure (HF) patients, with a particular emphasis on the effect of cardiovascular ageing. Additionally, it takes into consideration the sex-related variation in cardiovascular health and physiology and the role ageing plays in HF and its implications in drug therapy. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the common HF medications, classified according to the established sub-types, are summarised with respect to sex-specific documented findings. Despite numerous studies confirming significant differences in HF outcomes according to sex, there are no current guidelines that consider patients' sex in medical therapy of HF. Moreover, females are significantly under-represented in research trials, as well as under-treated in clinical practice, which hinders our understanding of HF in this demographic. Most of the current knowledge on sex-specific HF therapies is driven by secondary analyses of studies not primarily undertaking sex-specific analyses. Therefore, we propose a multi-faceted approach, including increased awareness among healthcare providers and more inclusive research to create a personalised care plan accounting for sex differences in HF management. Given the highlighted knowledge gaps, it is paramount for new research efforts to account for the different sex phenotypes in HF.

Background: Patients post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) can re-present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, culprit lesion identification, as well as revascularization, is often challenging. Furthermore, the impact of revascularization in this patient group is relatively unknown.

Objectives: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with previous CABG surgery presenting with ACS.

Methods: Using data from the Manitoba Center for Health Policy, we identified patients treated with CABG between April 1979 and March 2018, who subsequently presented with the primary diagnosis of ACS. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) managed medically and not investigated by cardiac catheterization and (2) investigated by cardiac catheterization and treated (2a) medically, (2b) with PCI, and (2c) with redo-CABG. Inverse probability treatment-weighted survival analyses were performed. Ethical approval was obtained from the local research board.

Results: Nearly 20% of patients treated with CABG presented with ACS at a median of 7.2 years (age at the time of CABG: 66 years (interquartile range: 58-73 years); 75.6% male). Patients treated with PCI (N = 929) demonstrated improved survival compared to the patients investigated by catheterization but treated medically (N = 952; hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.97, p = 0.02). Patients who underwent redo CABG (N = 171) experienced 13% mortality within the first year, but subsequently, demonstrated a trend toward improved survival.

Conclusion: ACS is not uncommon following CABG. Revascularization is associated with prognostic improvement; however, such could be accounted for by inherent group differences, including comorbidities and coronary anatomy These findings should be validated in a prospective randomized study.

Background: Extensive surgical resection of the thoracic aorta in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is thought to reduce the risk of late aortic wall degeneration and the need for repeat aortic operations.

Objectives: We evaluated the early and late outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root.

Design: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study.

Methods: The outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, that is dissection flap located at least in one of the Valsava segments, were herein evaluated. In-hospital mortality, neurological complications, dialysis as well as 10-year repeat proximal aortic operation, and mortality were the outcomes of this study.

Results: Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement was performed in 198 patients and aortic root replacement in 215 patients. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 4.0 years, 19 patients underwent 22 repeat procedures on the aortic root and/or aortic valve. No operative death occurred after these reinterventions. The risk of proximal aortic reoperation was significantly lower in patients who underwent aortic root replacement (5.5% vs 12.9%, adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio (SHR) 0.085, 95% CI 0.022-0.329). Aortic root replacement was associated with higher rates of in-hospital (14.4% vs 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio 2.192, 95% CI 1.000-4.807) and 10-year mortality (44.5% vs 30.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.216, 95% CI 1.338-3.671). Postoperative neurological complications and dialysis rates were comparable in the study groups.

Conclusion: Among patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, its replacement was associated with a significantly lower rate of repeat proximal aortic operation of any type compared to supracoronary aortic replacement. Still, aortic root replacement seems to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04831073 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04831073).

Misplacement of pericardiocentesis catheter in central veins is a rare complication that can be managed with several methods. In this case, we report a percutaneous image-guided plug-assisted management of a misplaced pericardiocentesis catheter into the inferior vena cava through a transhepatic tract successfully occluded. This minimally invasive technique was not previously described in this setting and had a favorable long-term outcome.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of calcified coronary arteries is associated with poor outcomes. Poorly modified calcified lesion hinders the stent delivery, disrupts drug-carrying polymer, impairs drug elution kinetics and results in under-expanded stent (UES). UES is the most common cause of acute stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis after PCI of calcified lesions. Angiography has poor sensitivity for recognition and quantification of coronary calcium, thereby mandating the use of intravascular imaging. Intravascular imaging, like intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, has the potential to accurately identify and quantify the coronary calcium and to guide appropriate modification device before stent placement. Available options for the modification of calcified plaque include modified balloons (cutting balloon, scoring balloon and high-pressure balloon), atherectomy devices (rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy) and laser atherectomy. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is the newest addition to the tool box for calcified plaque modification. It produces the acoustic shockwaves, which interact with the coronary calcium to cause multiplanar fractures. These calcium fractures increase the vessel compliance and result in desirable minimum stent areas. Coronary IVL has established its safety and efficacy for calcified lesion in series of Disrupt CAD trials. Its advantages over atherectomy devices include ease of use on workhorse wire, ability to modify deep calcium, no debris embolization causing slow flow or no-flow and minimal thermal injury. It is showing promising results in modification of difficult calcified lesion subsets such as calcified nodule, calcified left main bifurcation lesions and chronic total occlusion. In this review, authors will summarize the mechanism of action for IVL, its role in contemporary practice, evidence available for its use, its advantages over atherectomy devices and its imaging insight in different calcified lesion scenarios.

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging modality of cardiac structures and vasculature considered comparable to invasive coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in several major cardiovascular guidelines. Conventional image acquisition, processing, and analysis of CCTA imaging have progressed significantly in the past decade through advances in technology, computation, and engineering. However, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis of CCTA further drives past the limitations of conventional CCTA, allowing for greater achievements in speed, consistency, accuracy, and safety. AI-driven CCTA (AI-CCTA) has achieved a significant reduction in radiation exposure for patients, allowing for high-quality scans with sub-millisievert radiation doses. AI-CCTA has demonstrated comparable accuracy and consistency in manual coronary artery calcium scoring against expert human readers. An advantage over invasive coronary angiography, which provides luminal information only, CCTA allows for plaque characterization, providing detailed information on the quality of plaque and offering further prognosticative value for the management of CAD. Combined with AI, many recent studies demonstrate the efficacy, accuracy, efficiency, and precision of AI-driven analysis of CCTA imaging for the evaluation of CAD, including assessing degree stenosis, adverse plaque characteristics, and CT fractional flow reserve. The limitations of AI-CCTA include its early phase in investigation, the need for further improvements in AI modeling, possible medicolegal implications, and the need for further large-scale validation studies. Despite these limitations, AI-CCTA represents an important opportunity for improving cardiovascular care in an increasingly advanced and data-driven world of modern medicine.

Despite the significant increase in women in academic medicine over the last 50 years, women are still under-represented in leadership positions in academia. However, there is a lack of data on the diversity of editorial boards in Middle Eastern medical journals. So, we aim to portray the diversity of editorial boards of Iraqi medical journals by conducting a cross-sectional analysis of the editorial boards' members of all Iraqi medical journals. Gender, affiliation and specialty were extracted from the journals' websites and/or from the professional profiles of the editorial board members. Twenty-five journals and 446 editorial board members were analysed. More than half of editorial board members specialized in basic science, while 39.76% specialized in clinical specialties. Approximately, 20.18% of editorial board members (regardless their role) were women. Four percent of editor-in-chief were women. There were significant differences in editorial role according to gender (p < 0.0001), yet residency (p = 0.688) and specialty (p = 0.190) did not differ according to their gender. Most editorial board members were affiliated with Baghdad. So, we can conclude that there is a significant under-representation of women across all roles on the editorial board of medical journals especially in the leading positions. All stakeholders, publishers, authors and academics should commit to ensure the diversity of editorial boards.