Relatives' Right to Know Genetic Information in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-01
Christian Poland
{"title":"Relatives' Right to Know Genetic Information in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Christian Poland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Once someone is diagnosed with a genetic abnormality or disorder, that information can be extremely valuable to their biological relatives. It may allow them to access preventive treatment or make informed decisions, such as whether to have a biological child or not. However, when the original family member refuses to disclose that information to at-risk relatives, a conflict arises between their right to patient confidentiality and their relatives' right to know. Aotearoa New Zealand lacks a specific, workable mechanism for disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives. This article traverses the theoretical and practical issues involved in non-consensual disclosure of genetic information to suggest a new path for Aotearoa. It argues that the current, Western attitude of autonomy as an individual right free from obligations to others is no longer an appropriate justification for confidentiality over genetic information. Instead, patients diagnosed with a genetic abnormality or disorder should only be entitled to confidentiality where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy - determined by weighing the objective interests for and against disclosure. This approach recognises that we ought to consider our close relationships with others when we exercise autonomy over what is ultimately shared family information.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 2","pages":"410-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Once someone is diagnosed with a genetic abnormality or disorder, that information can be extremely valuable to their biological relatives. It may allow them to access preventive treatment or make informed decisions, such as whether to have a biological child or not. However, when the original family member refuses to disclose that information to at-risk relatives, a conflict arises between their right to patient confidentiality and their relatives' right to know. Aotearoa New Zealand lacks a specific, workable mechanism for disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives. This article traverses the theoretical and practical issues involved in non-consensual disclosure of genetic information to suggest a new path for Aotearoa. It argues that the current, Western attitude of autonomy as an individual right free from obligations to others is no longer an appropriate justification for confidentiality over genetic information. Instead, patients diagnosed with a genetic abnormality or disorder should only be entitled to confidentiality where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy - determined by weighing the objective interests for and against disclosure. This approach recognises that we ought to consider our close relationships with others when we exercise autonomy over what is ultimately shared family information.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的亲属基因信息知情权。
一旦某人被诊断出患有遗传异常或遗传疾病,这些信息对其亲生父母来说可能是极其宝贵的。这可以让他们获得预防性治疗或做出明智的决定,比如是否要一个亲生孩子。然而,当原始家庭成员拒绝向有风险的亲属披露这些信息时,他们的病人保密权与亲属的知情权之间就会产生冲突。奥特亚罗瓦-新西兰缺乏向高危亲属披露遗传信息的具体可行机制。本文探讨了未经同意披露基因信息所涉及的理论和实践问题,为奥特亚罗亚提出了一条新的道路。文章认为,目前西方国家将自主权视为一种个人权利,无需对他人承担义务,这种态度已不再是对遗传信息保密的适当理由。相反,被诊断为基因异常或紊乱的患者只有在对隐私有合理期望的情况下才有权要求保密--这要通过权衡支持和反对披露信息的客观利益来确定。这种方法承认,我们在对最终共享的家庭信息行使自主权时,应考虑到我们与他人的密切 关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Challenging Pandemic Law: From Vaccine Mandates to Judicial Review of Vaccine Approvals. Cystic Fibrosis and the Law: The Ramifications of New Treatments. Denial of Desire for Death in Dementia: Why Is Dementia Excluded from Australian Voluntary Assisted Dying Legislation? Informed Consent and the Duty to Warn: More than the Mere Provision of Information. Insight and the Capacity to Refuse Treatment with Electroconvulsive Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1