How does patient-centered communication work? Trend analysis of mediation through cancer worry and health self-efficacy, 2011-2020.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1177/13591053241228437
Jizhou Francis Ye, Shenting Zheng, Song Harris Ao, Changhao Dylan Yan, Yuyuan Lai, Ze Lai, Xinshu Zhao
{"title":"How does patient-centered communication work? Trend analysis of mediation through cancer worry and health self-efficacy, 2011-2020.","authors":"Jizhou Francis Ye, Shenting Zheng, Song Harris Ao, Changhao Dylan Yan, Yuyuan Lai, Ze Lai, Xinshu Zhao","doi":"10.1177/13591053241228437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study proposed and tested the cross-sectional effects of patient-centered communication (PCC) on cancer screening behaviors via an affective-cognitive sequential chain of mediation through cancer worry and health self-efficacy. Cross-sectional data were analyzed from four iterations of the Health Information National Trends Survey (2011, 2014, 2017, and 2020). The results found that lowered cancer worry following PCC does not show a cross-sectional positive effect in promoting cancer screening behaviors, while enhanced health self-efficacy as a subsequent state is a facilitator of screening behaviors. The findings further demonstrated increased PCC, a rise in cancer worry, and a sustained level of health self-efficacy. Also, our research has identified an upward trend in cancer screening behaviors from 2011 to 2017, followed by a notable decrease in 2020. These insights underscore the nuanced ways PCC can foster cancer screening behaviors, emphasizing the importance of emotional and cognitive aspects in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241228437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposed and tested the cross-sectional effects of patient-centered communication (PCC) on cancer screening behaviors via an affective-cognitive sequential chain of mediation through cancer worry and health self-efficacy. Cross-sectional data were analyzed from four iterations of the Health Information National Trends Survey (2011, 2014, 2017, and 2020). The results found that lowered cancer worry following PCC does not show a cross-sectional positive effect in promoting cancer screening behaviors, while enhanced health self-efficacy as a subsequent state is a facilitator of screening behaviors. The findings further demonstrated increased PCC, a rise in cancer worry, and a sustained level of health self-efficacy. Also, our research has identified an upward trend in cancer screening behaviors from 2011 to 2017, followed by a notable decrease in 2020. These insights underscore the nuanced ways PCC can foster cancer screening behaviors, emphasizing the importance of emotional and cognitive aspects in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以患者为中心的沟通如何发挥作用?2011-2020年通过癌症担忧和健康自我效能进行调解的趋势分析。
本研究提出并检验了以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)通过癌症担忧和健康自我效能的情感-认知序列中介链对癌症筛查行为的横断面影响。研究分析了四次全国健康信息趋势调查(2011 年、2014 年、2017 年和 2020 年)的横断面数据。结果发现,PCC 降低后的癌症担忧在促进癌症筛查行为方面并没有显示出横断面上的积极作用,而作为后续状态的健康自我效能感的增强则是筛查行为的促进因素。研究结果进一步表明,PCC 的增加、癌症担忧的上升和健康自我效能的持续水平。此外,我们的研究还发现,从 2011 年到 2017 年,癌症筛查行为呈上升趋势,随后在 2020 年出现明显下降。这些见解强调了 PCC 促进癌症筛查行为的细微方式,强调了临床环境中情感和认知方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
"We didn't even have time to worry about our mental health." Long-term impact of the pandemic on nursing professionals' experiences. Reporting heterogeneity in the associations between personality and health problems: Anchoring self-reports with health vignettes. Compassion in Italian palliative care: Investigating healthcre professionals' perspectives using focus groups. Identifying the ways in which tobacco cessation interventions have been tailored for sexual and gender minority individuals: A systematic review. Birth by emergency caesarean delivery: Perspectives of Wāhine Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1