Street experiments in intermediate cities: scope and perceptions of COVID-19 interventions

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Urban Mobility Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100072
Luis Vásquez , Rodrigo Mora , Giovanni Vecchio , Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken
{"title":"Street experiments in intermediate cities: scope and perceptions of COVID-19 interventions","authors":"Luis Vásquez ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Mora ,&nbsp;Giovanni Vecchio ,&nbsp;Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered significant changes in sustainable mobility in many large and well-known cities of the Global North, such as Paris, Milan or New York. Soon, various large Latin American cities followed suit, taking advantage of this global trend that included significant street experiments. However, it is less clear how these changes affected intermediate cities in this large region and how the population perceived these changes.</p><p>This paper analyzes the series of street experiments developed in Chilean intermediate cities during the COVID-19 pandemic. We intend to analyze to what extent intermediate cities have engaged in street experimentations and to examine the perceptions associated to street experiments. To this purpose, we surveyed public officials from Chilean intermediate cities and then focused on examining the street experiments developed in Quilpué, a city located 125 km west of Santiago.</p><p>The results showed that 9 of the 10 intermediate cities surveyed carried out interventions, with the emergency bicycle lane being the most frequent measure, followed by the widening of sidewalks. These were located in areas of high pedestrian flows and were mostly financed by own funds and ministerial funds. However, the main difficulty encountered was budgetary. In the case of Quilpué, shopkeepers have a rather negative view of the process, which was perceived as not very inclusive and participatory, with harmful consequences for the operation of their businesses. These results show that, to be more successful and gain long-term recognition, street experiments should pay more attention to community involvement, especially in small urban areas with deep-rooted auto-centric ways of thinking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100072"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000025/pdfft?md5=8377572479d9687096ae5711513c949e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667091724000025-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered significant changes in sustainable mobility in many large and well-known cities of the Global North, such as Paris, Milan or New York. Soon, various large Latin American cities followed suit, taking advantage of this global trend that included significant street experiments. However, it is less clear how these changes affected intermediate cities in this large region and how the population perceived these changes.

This paper analyzes the series of street experiments developed in Chilean intermediate cities during the COVID-19 pandemic. We intend to analyze to what extent intermediate cities have engaged in street experimentations and to examine the perceptions associated to street experiments. To this purpose, we surveyed public officials from Chilean intermediate cities and then focused on examining the street experiments developed in Quilpué, a city located 125 km west of Santiago.

The results showed that 9 of the 10 intermediate cities surveyed carried out interventions, with the emergency bicycle lane being the most frequent measure, followed by the widening of sidewalks. These were located in areas of high pedestrian flows and were mostly financed by own funds and ministerial funds. However, the main difficulty encountered was budgetary. In the case of Quilpué, shopkeepers have a rather negative view of the process, which was perceived as not very inclusive and participatory, with harmful consequences for the operation of their businesses. These results show that, to be more successful and gain long-term recognition, street experiments should pay more attention to community involvement, especially in small urban areas with deep-rooted auto-centric ways of thinking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中间城市的街头实验:COVID-19 干预措施的范围和看法
COVID-19 大流行引发了全球北方许多著名大城市(如巴黎、米兰或纽约)在可持续交通方面的重大变革。很快,拉美各大城市也纷纷效仿,利用这一全球趋势,进行了大量的街道实验。本文分析了 COVID-19 大流行期间在智利中间城市开展的一系列街头实验。我们打算分析中间城市在多大程度上参与了街头实验,并研究与街头实验相关的看法。为此,我们对智利中间城市的公共官员进行了调查,然后重点考察了位于圣地亚哥以西 125 公里处的基尔普埃市开展的街道实验。结果显示,接受调查的 10 个中间城市中有 9 个开展了干预措施,其中最常见的措施是设置紧急自行车道,其次是拓宽人行道。这些措施都位于人流量大的地区,资金大多来自自有资金和部委资金。然而,遇到的主要困难是预算问题。在基尔普埃,店主们对这一进程持相当负面的看法,认为其包容性和参与性不强,对他们的经营造成了有害影响。这些结果表明,为了取得更大的成功并获得长期认可,街头实验应更加重视社区参与,特别是在以自我为中心的思维方式根深蒂固的小城市地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contrasting Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the First Full-Year School Street Initiatives in Ontario, Canada Just around the corner: Accessibility by proximity in the 15-minute city Diminishing returns of additional active travel infrastructure: Evaluating Barcelona's decade of sustainable transportation progress Effects of different mobility concepts in new residential areas Enhancing last mile connectivity using shared mobility: A stated preference survey of business park commuters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1