Comment on ‘The Generation of Eocene Mafic Dike Swarms During the Exhumation of a Core Complex, Biarjmand Area, NE Iran’ by Azizi et al. (2023), Journal of Petrology, 64, 1-18

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Petrology Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1093/petrology/egae011
Ahmadreza Malekpour-Alamdari
{"title":"Comment on ‘The Generation of Eocene Mafic Dike Swarms During the Exhumation of a Core Complex, Biarjmand Area, NE Iran’ by Azizi et al. (2023), Journal of Petrology, 64, 1-18","authors":"Ahmadreza Malekpour-Alamdari","doi":"10.1093/petrology/egae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Azizi et al. (2023) have attributed the E-W-oriented mafic dike swarm in the Biarjmand metamorphic core complex to an Eocene extensional event which is much younger than a previously suggested Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous age (Malekpour-Alamdari et al., 2017). They proposed that the emplacement of these dikes occurred in a rapid extensional regime coeval with the exhumation of the core complex after gravitational instability in the Central Iran/Eurasia collision zone. I appreciate the opportunity this paper provides to shed light on specific aspects of the Late Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic continental extension within the Eurasian sector of the Neotethys subduction system. However, I here bring to attention certain discrepancies within Azizi et al.'s (2023) publication. Specifically, the assignment of an Eocene age to the emplacement of the E-W-oriented dike swarm, even though purportedly supported by U-Pb zircon dating, appears to be at odds with field observations and previously published geochronological data. Furthermore, the paper contains internal contradictions in its presentation of the core complex model for the study area. It is important to note that Malekpour-Alamdari (2017) and Malekpour-Alamdari et al. (2017) previously documented the geochronological-based metamorphic core complex model of the area. Regrettably, despite its direct relevance, these earlier works have not been acknowledged in Azizi et al.'s (2023) paper. In this comment, I outline the problems with the structural and regional geology, the zircon U-Pb age of the dike samples, the age of the dike swarm, and the geodynamic interpretations in Azizi et al.'s (2023) work.","PeriodicalId":16751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egae011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Azizi et al. (2023) have attributed the E-W-oriented mafic dike swarm in the Biarjmand metamorphic core complex to an Eocene extensional event which is much younger than a previously suggested Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous age (Malekpour-Alamdari et al., 2017). They proposed that the emplacement of these dikes occurred in a rapid extensional regime coeval with the exhumation of the core complex after gravitational instability in the Central Iran/Eurasia collision zone. I appreciate the opportunity this paper provides to shed light on specific aspects of the Late Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic continental extension within the Eurasian sector of the Neotethys subduction system. However, I here bring to attention certain discrepancies within Azizi et al.'s (2023) publication. Specifically, the assignment of an Eocene age to the emplacement of the E-W-oriented dike swarm, even though purportedly supported by U-Pb zircon dating, appears to be at odds with field observations and previously published geochronological data. Furthermore, the paper contains internal contradictions in its presentation of the core complex model for the study area. It is important to note that Malekpour-Alamdari (2017) and Malekpour-Alamdari et al. (2017) previously documented the geochronological-based metamorphic core complex model of the area. Regrettably, despite its direct relevance, these earlier works have not been acknowledged in Azizi et al.'s (2023) paper. In this comment, I outline the problems with the structural and regional geology, the zircon U-Pb age of the dike samples, the age of the dike swarm, and the geodynamic interpretations in Azizi et al.'s (2023) work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 Azizi 等人(2023 年)所作 "伊朗东北部 Biarjmand 地区岩心复合体出露期间始新世岩浆岩堤群的生成 "的评论,《岩石学杂志》,64 期,1-18 页
Azizi等人(2023年)将Biarjmand变质岩核心复合体中的E-W向岩浆岩堤群归因于始新世的延伸事件,该事件比之前提出的晚侏罗世-早白垩世时代要年轻得多(Malekpour-Alamdari等人,2017年)。他们提出,这些岩钉的形成是在伊朗中部/欧亚大陆碰撞带重力不稳定之后,与岩心复合体的掘起同时发生的快速伸展过程中。我很高兴这篇论文为我们提供了一个机会,使我们能够了解新特提斯俯冲系统欧亚板块中生代晚期-新生代早期大陆延伸的具体情况。然而,我在此提请注意 Azizi 等人(2023 年)出版物中的某些差异。具体来说,尽管声称 U-Pb 锆石年代测定法支持 E-W 向长堤群的形成,但将其年代定为始新世,这似乎与实地观察和以前发表的地质年代数据不符。此外,该论文在介绍研究区域的岩心复合模型时也存在内部矛盾。必须指出的是,Malekpour-Alamdari(2017 年)和 Malekpour-Alamdari 等人(2017 年)之前记录了该地区基于地质时序的变质岩核心复合体模型。令人遗憾的是,尽管这些早期工作与此直接相关,但在 Azizi 等人(2023 年)的论文中并未得到承认。在这篇评论中,我概述了 Azizi 等人(2023 年)的工作在结构和区域地质学、锆石 U-Pb 年龄、堤群年龄和地球动力学解释方面存在的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petrology
Journal of Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petrology provides an international forum for the publication of high quality research in the broad field of igneous and metamorphic petrology and petrogenesis. Papers published cover a vast range of topics in areas such as major element, trace element and isotope geochemistry and geochronology applied to petrogenesis; experimental petrology; processes of magma generation, differentiation and emplacement; quantitative studies of rock-forming minerals and their paragenesis; regional studies of igneous and meta morphic rocks which contribute to the solution of fundamental petrological problems; theoretical modelling of petrogenetic processes.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the Magmatic-to-Carbothermal Processes in the Ba-Sr-REE Mineralization of the Sevattur Carbonatites, India Geodynamic Evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean in the West Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW Tibet: Implications from the Sub-Arc Crust and Lithospheric Mantle Modification Crystals and melt inclusions record deep storage of superhydrous magma prior to the largest known eruption of Cerro Machín volcano, Colombia Composite melt-rock interactions in the lowermost continental crust: insights from a dunite-pyroxenite-gabbronorite association of the Mafic Complex from the Ivrea-Verbano Zone (Italian Alps) Reexamining the Honolulu Volcanics: Hawai‘i's classic case of rejuvenation volcanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1