Fusion learning of preference and bias from ratings and reviews for item recommendation

IF 2.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Data & Knowledge Engineering Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.datak.2024.102283
Junrui Liu , Tong Li , Zhen Yang , Di Wu , Huan Liu
{"title":"Fusion learning of preference and bias from ratings and reviews for item recommendation","authors":"Junrui Liu ,&nbsp;Tong Li ,&nbsp;Zhen Yang ,&nbsp;Di Wu ,&nbsp;Huan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.datak.2024.102283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recommendation methods improve rating prediction performance by learning selection bias phenomenon-users tend to rate items they like. These methods model selection bias by calculating the propensities of ratings, but inaccurate propensity could introduce more noise, fail to model selection bias, and reduce prediction performance. We argue that learning interaction features can effectively model selection bias and improve model performance, as interaction features explain the reason of the trend. Reviews can be used to model interaction features because they have a strong intrinsic correlation with user interests and item interactions. In this study, we propose a preference- and bias-oriented fusion learning model (PBFL) that models the interaction features based on reviews and user preferences to make rating predictions. Our proposal both embeds traditional user preferences in reviews, interactions, and ratings and considers word distribution bias and review quoting to model interaction features. Six real-world datasets are used to demonstrate effectiveness and performance. PBFL achieves an average improvement of 4.46% in root-mean-square error (RMSE) and 3.86% in mean absolute error (MAE) over the best baseline.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55184,"journal":{"name":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 102283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X24000077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recommendation methods improve rating prediction performance by learning selection bias phenomenon-users tend to rate items they like. These methods model selection bias by calculating the propensities of ratings, but inaccurate propensity could introduce more noise, fail to model selection bias, and reduce prediction performance. We argue that learning interaction features can effectively model selection bias and improve model performance, as interaction features explain the reason of the trend. Reviews can be used to model interaction features because they have a strong intrinsic correlation with user interests and item interactions. In this study, we propose a preference- and bias-oriented fusion learning model (PBFL) that models the interaction features based on reviews and user preferences to make rating predictions. Our proposal both embeds traditional user preferences in reviews, interactions, and ratings and considers word distribution bias and review quoting to model interaction features. Six real-world datasets are used to demonstrate effectiveness and performance. PBFL achieves an average improvement of 4.46% in root-mean-square error (RMSE) and 3.86% in mean absolute error (MAE) over the best baseline.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从评分和评论中融合学习偏好和偏见,以进行项目推荐
推荐方法通过学习选择偏差现象--用户倾向于给自己喜欢的项目评分--来提高评分预测性能。这些方法通过计算评分的倾向性来模拟选择偏差,但不准确的倾向性会带来更多噪音,无法模拟选择偏差,降低预测性能。我们认为,学习交互特征可以有效地模拟选择偏差并提高模型性能,因为交互特征可以解释趋势的原因。评论可用于交互特征建模,因为它们与用户兴趣和项目交互有很强的内在相关性。在本研究中,我们提出了一种以偏好和偏见为导向的融合学习模型(PBFL),该模型基于评论和用户偏好对交互特征进行建模,从而做出评分预测。我们的建议既在评论、互动和评分中嵌入了传统的用户偏好,又考虑了单词分布偏差和评论引用,从而为互动特征建模。我们使用了六个真实世界的数据集来证明其有效性和性能。与最佳基准相比,PBFL 的均方根误差 (RMSE) 平均提高了 4.46%,平均绝对误差 (MAE) 平均提高了 3.86%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Data & Knowledge Engineering 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Data & Knowledge Engineering (DKE) stimulates the exchange of ideas and interaction between these two related fields of interest. DKE reaches a world-wide audience of researchers, designers, managers and users. The major aim of the journal is to identify, investigate and analyze the underlying principles in the design and effective use of these systems.
期刊最新文献
Goal modelling in aeronautics: Practical applications for aircraft and manufacturing designs Ethical reasoning methods for ICT: What they are and when to use them SSQTKG: A Subgraph-based Semantic Query Approach for Temporal Knowledge Graph NoSQL document data migration strategy in the context of schema evolution VarClaMM: A reference meta-model to understand DNA variant classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1