Living the Janus Face: The Promise and Perils of Role-Distancing for Middle Managers

IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1111/joms.13041
S. Gjerde, M. Alvesson
{"title":"Living the Janus Face: The Promise and Perils of Role-Distancing for Middle Managers","authors":"S. Gjerde, M. Alvesson","doi":"10.1111/joms.13041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Middle managers often find themselves in a challenging position: They have to impress different audiences in somewhat incompatible ways and represent and enact managerial ideals and expectations that may be detrimental to their work identities. This study explores role distancing as an alluring coping strategy. Role distancing – acts that express separateness between the individual and the enacted role – may enable the professional to <i>do</i> management and give an impressive managerial performance, without <i>becoming</i> a manager. This may seem like the perfect strategy to impress others while escaping identity struggles. Or maybe not. In this study we take a closer look at role distancing among a group of middle managers in higher education and focus on one manager, Manny, in particular over a period of time. We find that what first seemed to be a promising strategy applauded by a backstage audience, turns into a problem in need of its own solution, as backstage also becomes a frontstage. The paper contributes to theory about middle managers, role distancing in professional work and front−/backstage acting.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Middle managers often find themselves in a challenging position: They have to impress different audiences in somewhat incompatible ways and represent and enact managerial ideals and expectations that may be detrimental to their work identities. This study explores role distancing as an alluring coping strategy. Role distancing – acts that express separateness between the individual and the enacted role – may enable the professional to do management and give an impressive managerial performance, without becoming a manager. This may seem like the perfect strategy to impress others while escaping identity struggles. Or maybe not. In this study we take a closer look at role distancing among a group of middle managers in higher education and focus on one manager, Manny, in particular over a period of time. We find that what first seemed to be a promising strategy applauded by a backstage audience, turns into a problem in need of its own solution, as backstage also becomes a frontstage. The paper contributes to theory about middle managers, role distancing in professional work and front−/backstage acting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活出杰纳斯面孔:中层管理者角色分工的希望与危险
中层管理人员常常发现自己处于一个具有挑战性的位置:他们必须以互不相容的方式给不同的受众留下深刻印象,并代表和实现可能有损于其工作身份的管理理想和期望。本研究探讨了角色疏远这一诱人的应对策略。角色疏离--表达个人与所扮演角色之间分离的行为--可以使专业人员在不成为管理者的情况下从事管理工作,并做出令人印象深刻的管理业绩。这似乎是一种完美的策略,既能给他人留下深刻印象,又能逃避身份认同的挣扎。或许并非如此。在本研究中,我们仔细研究了一群高等教育机构中层管理人员的角色疏离现象,并特别关注了一位名叫曼尼(Manny)的管理人员在一段时间内的角色疏离现象。我们发现,最初看似被后台观众称赞的大有可为的策略,随着后台也变成了前台,变成了一个需要自己解决的问题。本文对有关中层管理者、职业工作中的角色疏离以及前台/后台表演的理论有所贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1