首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Management Studies最新文献

英文 中文
Issue Information - Notes for Contributors 发行信息 - 投稿须知
IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1111/joms.12956
{"title":"Issue Information - Notes for Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/joms.12956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12956","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"61 8","pages":"3843-3847"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.12956","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142641610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Issue Information - Notes for Contributors 发行信息 - 投稿须知
IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/joms.12954
{"title":"Issue Information - Notes for Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/joms.12954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12954","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"61 7","pages":"3396-3400"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.12954","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142439049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Essays in Management and Organization Studies: Past, Present, and Future of a Generative Genre 管理与组织研究论文集》:生成性文体的过去、现在和未来
IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13149
Thomas Roulet, April Wright, Stav Fainshmidt, Trish Reay
<p>Essays are currently flourishing as a genre in the field of management and organization studies. Decidedly distinct from empirical, theoretical, or agenda-setting work, essays take a variety of forms throughout the field, including expository essays offering explanation, polemical essays providing critique, theoretical essays introducing new theoretical lenses, and narrative essays grounded in storytelling of personal experiences and emotions (Vince and Hibbert, <span>2018</span>). Essays are an important platform where academics can recognize that our role is not only to predict or explain (Lindebaum and Wright, <span>2021</span>) but also to motivate change through our writing. In this way, essays can be a generative genre for inviting purposeful (and sometimes radical) action towards changing our field.</p><p>The Journal of Management Studies is a strong proponent of this view of essays as a generative genre. In 2016, the journal launched its new essay section, entitled ‘<i>JMS Says</i>’. In its eight years of existence, JMS Says has matured, and the essays we edit have taken on a more defined objective and format as we lean into the possibilities of essays as a generative genre. Our focus has sharpened on narrative essays, which provide the opportunity for scholars to set out a unique and personal view on our environment (for us, as management academics) and what it could ideally become. We note that several other outlets have also created their own essay sections in accord with their views of the essay genre and particular focus. As JMS Says advances, and based on our collective years as editors at JMS Says, here we set out our views on the role, format, and potential of essays as a generative genre for management and organization scholars.</p><p>Essays matter more than ever because they can help shed light on unspoken aspects of our work as academics, from the vulnerabilities we experience (Hibbert, <span>2024</span>) to the increasing risk of research extraction in marginalized communities (Bothello and Bonfim, <span>2023</span>). They can also flip the script by challenging the assumptions at the core of our profession, such as those we have around data sharing (Schwarz and Bouckenooghe, <span>2024</span>) or the roles of the deans in business school (Cassell, <span>2024</span>). In short, essays have the power to inspire us to be better at what we do.</p><p>Yet, we can only shape essays as a generative genre with a clear definition and expectation, which we have progressively refined for the Journal of Management Studies. We see that the strength of JMS Says is its distinctiveness in coexisting with more traditional genres such as empirical or theoretical work. As a generative genre, JMS Says essays need to (1) draw from personal experiences to carry emotional weight, (2) identify an original or overlooked issue among management scholars, and (3) offer a clear ‘call to action’ for our academic community. Building on this threefold man
论文目前在管理和组织研究领域蓬勃发展。与实证、理论或议程设置工作截然不同,论文在整个领域采取各种形式,包括提供解释的说明性论文、提供批评的辩论性论文、介绍新理论镜头的理论论文,以及以个人经历和情感故事为基础的叙事论文(Vince and Hibbert, 2018)。论文是一个重要的平台,学者可以认识到我们的角色不仅是预测或解释(Lindebaum和Wright, 2021),而且通过我们的写作来激励变革。通过这种方式,文章可以成为一种生成类型,邀请有目的的(有时是激进的)行动来改变我们的领域。《管理研究杂志》(Journal of Management Studies)强烈支持这种观点,认为论文是一种生成体裁。2016年,该杂志推出了名为“JMS说”的新文章部分。在过去的八年里,JMS说已经成熟了,我们编辑的文章也有了更明确的目标和格式,因为我们研究了散文作为一种生成体裁的可能性。我们把重点放在了叙事性论文上,这为学者们提供了一个机会,让他们对我们的环境(对我们这些管理学者来说)及其理想状态提出独特的个人观点。我们注意到,其他几个网点也创建了自己的文章部分,根据他们的观点的文章类型和特别的重点。随着JMS的发展,基于我们作为JMS编辑的共同岁月,我们在这里阐述了我们对论文作为管理和组织学者的生成体裁的角色、格式和潜力的看法。论文比以往任何时候都更重要,因为它们可以帮助我们揭示作为学者的工作中不言而喻的方面,从我们所经历的脆弱性(希伯特,2024年)到边缘化社区研究提取的风险日益增加(Bothello和bonfilm, 2023年)。它们还可以通过挑战我们专业的核心假设来扭转局面,比如我们对数据共享的假设(施瓦茨和布肯努格,2024年),或者商学院院长的角色(卡塞尔,2024年)。简而言之,文章有能力激励我们做得更好。然而,我们只能将论文塑造成一种具有明确定义和期望的生成类型,我们已经为《管理研究杂志》逐步完善了这一定义和期望。我们看到,《JMS说》的优势在于它与更传统的体裁(如经验主义或理论著作)共存的独特性。JMS表示,作为一种生成体裁,论文需要(1)从个人经历中汲取情感分量,(2)在管理学者中找出一个原始的或被忽视的问题,(3)为我们的学术界提供一个明确的“行动呼吁”。基于这一三重使命,我们的团队编辑了一系列文章,希望这些文章能让我们作为管理学学者进行不同的思考和行动。管理学术通常被视为旨在“建立理论并为管理实践做出贡献”(George, 2014,第1页)。然而,我们如何具体做到这一点还有待想象,这两个目标可能很遥远。为管理实践做出贡献是影响力的典范(MacIntosh et al., 2021),而撰写新颖的理论是打开顶级期刊大门的原因(Cornelissen and Durand, 2014)。但在旨在为理论和实践做出贡献的科学写作之外,还有一个世界。在我们的领域,围绕论文的许多争论都是为了确定它们如何构成“合法的管理知识”,并帮助我们“克服经验主义的教条”(Suddaby, 2018,第441-442页)。如今,论文的有用性受到的质疑较少,它已被接受为一种“学术形式”(Delbridge等人,2016年,第239页)。论文是对管理学者的一种邀请,让他们用不同的代码和方法为不同的流派写作,但具有不同的影响潜力。在将论文视为一种生成类型时,我们将论文视为我们领域的一种制度性创业形式(Battilana et al., 2009):它们的内容以一种对我们的职业及其与社会的关系具有生成性的方式挑战我们的假设和价值观。我们对管理学术影响的痴迷(Bothello and Roulet, 2019)忽视了实现这一目标的非常平凡的方法:简单地研究我们自己和我们作为管理学者的实践。论文通过让我们和我们的同事重新思考我们作为管理学者认为理所当然的东西,可以改变我们是谁、我们做什么,以及最终我们如何影响实践世界和更广泛的社会的本质。我们倾向于将自己(管理学者)视为一个认知共同体,而不是试图实现集体目标的专业人士。我们需要彼此交谈,讨论我们的经历,以及我们如何工作,如何为我们的领域和社会做出贡献。 在我们目前经历的快节奏世界中,这一点尤为重要:论文可以帮助我们参与对话,探讨作为一名管理学者意味着什么。它给了我们一个放慢脚步的机会(Marinetto, 2018),重新考虑我们的实践和身份。自2016年第一篇论文发表在《管理研究杂志》(Journal of Management Studies)上以来,其他媒体也开始接受和印刷论文。期刊论文部分的蓬勃发展证明了它们给我们的领域带来的活力。然而,与我们领域的其他类型的论文相比,论文数量的增加可能模糊了论文的界限。随着JMS的发展,我们逐渐对我们发表的文章类型采用了更明确的定义。我们过去发表的一些文章,尽管质量很高,但不适合今天的JMS说。例如,以前的一些论文为未来的研究设定了议程,充实了一个特定的理论结构,或者发展了方法论命题;尽管这些都是重要的话题,但这些文章的重点并不是鼓励我们作为管理学者采取不同的行动。此外,一些旧的JMS文章并没有像我们现在所要求的那样,以个人叙述为基础。目前的编辑团队认为,JMS Says文章的一个关键优势是将个人情感作为行动的燃料,因此使JMS Says与其他期刊的文章部分有重要的不同。下面,我们将解释该期刊这部分文章的主要特征。我们相信,我们编辑的论文将继续对我们的领域产生重大影响,这符合我们的总体目标。综上所述,这四个核心要素(表1)支撑着JMS说的论文部分,作为一个个人反思和批评学者的生活经历的出口,学术生活的许多不同方面可能会给我们带来麻烦、困惑、恐惧、沮丧和/或激励我们想要做不同的事情。旨在通过研究推进经验知识,或通过基于现有文献的论点来推进概念知识的投稿,不适合JMS Says部分,更适合作为传统的完整论文撰写并提交给该期刊。类似地,关于需要新的研究计划或方法的呼吁行动的提交也不适合JMS所说的部分。希望提出更广泛的政治或方法论观点的潜在作者可以考虑JMS的观点/对位部分。在本节中,我们将重点关注一篇优秀的JMS论文的关键特征。我们寻找的手稿表明,学者如何有一个原创的和批判性的采取自己的个人经验,学术生活的某些特定方面。此外,他们还将这些见解与具体的行动呼吁结合起来,要求采取不同的行动,以及由谁采取不同的行动。在我们担任《JMS说》编辑的这些年里,我们一直在强化上面强调的四个核心要素,作为从提案到出版的旅程的一部分。我们相信,坚持这些元素有助于作者完善他们的行动呼吁,提出新颖的主张,并解释他们的呼吁是如何根植于他们的个人经历的。就流程而言,每个初始的300字提案由两名JMS said编辑(在给定的任期内执行此角色)和一名JMS总编辑或副编辑考虑。编辑们共同决定是否为作者提供一个机会来写一个修改后的建议或完整文章的第一版,或者如果它不符合上述标准,则拒绝提交。如果有机会发展一篇完整的文章,仍然有可能被拒绝。然而,大多数邀请提交一篇完整的文章都导致了发表。作为这个过程的一部分,编辑和作者会反复进行一系列的修改,以强化信息和号召行动,同时强调对文章至关重要的内省和个人叙述。该杂志的目标是“发表原创、创新和高质量的论文,
{"title":"Essays in Management and Organization Studies: Past, Present, and Future of a Generative Genre","authors":"Thomas Roulet,&nbsp;April Wright,&nbsp;Stav Fainshmidt,&nbsp;Trish Reay","doi":"10.1111/joms.13149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13149","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Essays are currently flourishing as a genre in the field of management and organization studies. Decidedly distinct from empirical, theoretical, or agenda-setting work, essays take a variety of forms throughout the field, including expository essays offering explanation, polemical essays providing critique, theoretical essays introducing new theoretical lenses, and narrative essays grounded in storytelling of personal experiences and emotions (Vince and Hibbert, &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;). Essays are an important platform where academics can recognize that our role is not only to predict or explain (Lindebaum and Wright, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;) but also to motivate change through our writing. In this way, essays can be a generative genre for inviting purposeful (and sometimes radical) action towards changing our field.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Journal of Management Studies is a strong proponent of this view of essays as a generative genre. In 2016, the journal launched its new essay section, entitled ‘&lt;i&gt;JMS Says&lt;/i&gt;’. In its eight years of existence, JMS Says has matured, and the essays we edit have taken on a more defined objective and format as we lean into the possibilities of essays as a generative genre. Our focus has sharpened on narrative essays, which provide the opportunity for scholars to set out a unique and personal view on our environment (for us, as management academics) and what it could ideally become. We note that several other outlets have also created their own essay sections in accord with their views of the essay genre and particular focus. As JMS Says advances, and based on our collective years as editors at JMS Says, here we set out our views on the role, format, and potential of essays as a generative genre for management and organization scholars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Essays matter more than ever because they can help shed light on unspoken aspects of our work as academics, from the vulnerabilities we experience (Hibbert, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;) to the increasing risk of research extraction in marginalized communities (Bothello and Bonfim, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). They can also flip the script by challenging the assumptions at the core of our profession, such as those we have around data sharing (Schwarz and Bouckenooghe, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;) or the roles of the deans in business school (Cassell, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). In short, essays have the power to inspire us to be better at what we do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet, we can only shape essays as a generative genre with a clear definition and expectation, which we have progressively refined for the Journal of Management Studies. We see that the strength of JMS Says is its distinctiveness in coexisting with more traditional genres such as empirical or theoretical work. As a generative genre, JMS Says essays need to (1) draw from personal experiences to carry emotional weight, (2) identify an original or overlooked issue among management scholars, and (3) offer a clear ‘call to action’ for our academic community. Building on this threefold man","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"62 1","pages":"518-525"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13149","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework 商业、冲突与和平:系统文献综述与概念框架
IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13139
Jay Joseph, François Maon, Maria Teresa Uribe‐Jaramillo, John E. Katsos, Adam Lindgreen
There is growing recognition that business activity can promote peacebuilding, yet contradictory claims have emerged about company roles in peace and conflict. The research field of business and peace has focused on this issue, as have scholars in related fields like political science, economics, law, and ethics. This has led to definitional variations, alongside unit and level of analysis differences, which generate contradictory claims that hamper future research on this critical topic. To reconcile extant research around companies and their place in peacebuilding scholarship, we undertake an organizational‐level examination of the field, cataloguing the research by scholars across disciplines through a systematic review of 215 publications. Our review maps the known ways by which businesses can engage in peacebuilding, while demonstrating how organizations exercise their agency to create heterogenous effects on peace and conflict. Our analysis highlights the need for businesses to advance peace‐positive ends across a range of activities to reduce the conflict‐causing effects of business. By showing that businesses, intentionally or not, create peace or conflict through their activities, this article issues a call to action for scholars and decision‐makers to advance knowledge concerning peacebuilding organizations.
越来越多的人认识到,商业活动可以促进和平建设,但关于公司在和平与冲突中的作用,却出现了相互矛盾的说法。商业与和平研究领域以及政治学、经济学、法学和伦理学等相关领域的学者都在关注这一问题。这导致了定义上的差异,以及分析单位和层次上的差异,从而产生了相互矛盾的主张,阻碍了未来对这一重要课题的研究。为了协调围绕公司及其在建设和平学术中的地位的现有研究,我们对该领域进行了组织层面的审查,通过对 215 篇出版物的系统审查,对各学科学者的研究进行了编目。我们的综述描绘了企业参与建设和平的已知方式,同时展示了组织如何发挥其作用,对和平与冲突产生不同的影响。我们的分析强调,企业需要在一系列活动中推进积极的和平目标,以减少企业的冲突影响。通过展示企业有意无意地通过其活动创造和平或冲突,本文呼吁学者和决策者采取行动,推进有关建设和平组织的知识。
{"title":"Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework","authors":"Jay Joseph, François Maon, Maria Teresa Uribe‐Jaramillo, John E. Katsos, Adam Lindgreen","doi":"10.1111/joms.13139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13139","url":null,"abstract":"There is growing recognition that business activity can promote peacebuilding, yet contradictory claims have emerged about company roles in peace and conflict. The research field of business and peace has focused on this issue, as have scholars in related fields like political science, economics, law, and ethics. This has led to definitional variations, alongside unit and level of analysis differences, which generate contradictory claims that hamper future research on this critical topic. To reconcile extant research around companies and their place in peacebuilding scholarship, we undertake an organizational‐level examination of the field, cataloguing the research by scholars across disciplines through a systematic review of 215 publications. Our review maps the known ways by which businesses can engage in peacebuilding, while demonstrating how organizations exercise their agency to create heterogenous effects on peace and conflict. Our analysis highlights the need for businesses to advance peace‐positive ends across a range of activities to reduce the conflict‐causing effects of business. By showing that businesses, intentionally or not, create peace or conflict through their activities, this article issues a call to action for scholars and decision‐makers to advance knowledge concerning peacebuilding organizations.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142255052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcome‐Based Typology of Social Enterprises: Interlacing Individual Transformation, Capital Provision, and Societal Influence 基于成果的社会企业类型学:个人转变、资本提供和社会影响之间的相互联系
IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13138
Georgios Polychronopoulos, Martin Lukeš, Giuliano Sansone, Anirudh Agrawal, Florian Ulrich‐Diener, Veronika Šlapáková Losová
Social entrepreneurship has emerged as a global phenomenon aimed at tackling societal grand challenges through market‐based activities. A holistic understanding of social enterprise outcomes is crucial for reflecting their effectiveness in meeting social objectives and informing internal organizational processes. This study explores the outcomes of social enterprises through a comparative qualitative analysis of 49 social ventures in Austria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United States, spanning diverse sectors. Three key outcome dimensions are identified: individual transformation, capital provision, and societal influence. Our analysis results in a typology of seven distinct types of social enterprises, each integrating these dimensions to varying degrees. Utilizing this typology, we reveal how social enterprises navigate barriers to solving complex social and environmental problems, illustrating the dynamic interplay between outcome dimensions and the importance of multi‐objective organizing – beyond hybrid organizing – in addressing complex societal issues.
社会创业已成为一种全球现象,旨在通过市场活动应对社会的巨大挑战。全面了解社会企业的成果对于反映其在实现社会目标方面的有效性以及为内部组织流程提供信息至关重要。本研究通过对奥地利、加拿大、捷克、丹麦、德国、希腊、印度、意大利、荷兰和美国不同行业的 49 家社会企业进行比较定性分析,探索社会企业的成果。我们确定了三个关键的成果维度:个人转变、资本提供和社会影响。通过分析,我们对七种不同类型的社会企业进行了分类,每种社会企业都在不同程度上整合了这些维度。利用这种类型学,我们揭示了社会企业如何克服障碍,解决复杂的社会和环境问题,说明了结果维度之间的动态相互作用,以及多目标组织--超越混合组织--在解决复杂社会问题中的重要性。
{"title":"Outcome‐Based Typology of Social Enterprises: Interlacing Individual Transformation, Capital Provision, and Societal Influence","authors":"Georgios Polychronopoulos, Martin Lukeš, Giuliano Sansone, Anirudh Agrawal, Florian Ulrich‐Diener, Veronika Šlapáková Losová","doi":"10.1111/joms.13138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13138","url":null,"abstract":"Social entrepreneurship has emerged as a global phenomenon aimed at tackling societal grand challenges through market‐based activities. A holistic understanding of social enterprise outcomes is crucial for reflecting their effectiveness in meeting social objectives and informing internal organizational processes. This study explores the outcomes of social enterprises through a comparative qualitative analysis of 49 social ventures in Austria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United States, spanning diverse sectors. Three key outcome dimensions are identified: individual transformation, capital provision, and societal influence. Our analysis results in a typology of seven distinct types of social enterprises, each integrating these dimensions to varying degrees. Utilizing this typology, we reveal how social enterprises navigate barriers to solving complex social and environmental problems, illustrating the dynamic interplay between outcome dimensions and the importance of multi‐objective organizing – beyond hybrid organizing – in addressing complex societal issues.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142255053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multimodal Collective Sensemaking in Extreme Contexts: Evidence from Maritime Search and Rescue 极端环境下的多模式集体感知:海上搜救的证据
IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13133
Thomas Lübcke, Norbert Steigenberger, Hendrik Wilhelm, Indre Maurer
In extreme contexts, actors must often engage in collective sensemaking to enable coordinated action. While prior research has established that cognitive disparities and emotive distractions disrupt collective sensemaking, we lack theory on how actors overcome these common challenges in extreme contexts. To address this shortcoming, we conducted a process study, collecting unique multi‐perspective video and archival data during a maritime search and rescue mission in the Aegean Sea where actors (i.e., rescue crew members and refugees) faced cognitive disparities (e.g., different levels of maritime expertise) and distracting emotions (e.g., fear, anxiety, and tension) yet needed to coordinate their actions to ensure a safe evacuation. We draw on this data to develop a collective sensemaking model that details the auxiliary process steps and multimodal communication – verbal, para‐verbal, and non‐verbal cues – actors use to alternately frame emotional states and convey task‐related information. Our model demonstrates how actors, through multimodal collective sensemaking, overcome the challenges posed by cognitive disparities and distracting emotions in extreme contexts. It thus adds a dynamic emotive and bodily perspective to the predominantly cognitive and verbal understanding in sensemaking theory, and also has implications for practitioners working in extreme contexts.
在极端情况下,行动者必须经常进行集体感知,以便采取协调行动。虽然先前的研究已经证实,认知差异和情绪干扰会破坏集体意识的形成,但我们缺乏行动者如何在极端环境中克服这些常见挑战的理论。为了弥补这一不足,我们开展了一项过程研究,在爱琴海的一次海上搜救任务中收集了独特的多视角视频和档案数据,在这次任务中,行动者(即救援船员和难民)面临着认知差异(如不同的海事专业知识水平)和分散注意力的情绪(如恐惧、焦虑和紧张),但他们需要协调行动以确保安全撤离。我们利用这些数据建立了一个集体感知模型,详细说明了辅助过程步骤和多模态交流--语言、辅助语言和非语言提示--行动者用来交替调整情绪状态和传递与任务相关的信息。我们的模型展示了行动者如何通过多模态集体感知,克服极端环境下认知差异和分散注意力的情绪所带来的挑战。因此,该模型为感知建立理论中以认知和语言为主的理解添加了一个动态的情感和身体视角,同时也对在极端环境中工作的从业人员具有启示意义。
{"title":"Multimodal Collective Sensemaking in Extreme Contexts: Evidence from Maritime Search and Rescue","authors":"Thomas Lübcke, Norbert Steigenberger, Hendrik Wilhelm, Indre Maurer","doi":"10.1111/joms.13133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13133","url":null,"abstract":"In extreme contexts, actors must often engage in collective sensemaking to enable coordinated action. While prior research has established that cognitive disparities and emotive distractions disrupt collective sensemaking, we lack theory on how actors overcome these common challenges in extreme contexts. To address this shortcoming, we conducted a process study, collecting unique multi‐perspective video and archival data during a maritime search and rescue mission in the Aegean Sea where actors (i.e., rescue crew members and refugees) faced cognitive disparities (e.g., different levels of maritime expertise) and distracting emotions (e.g., fear, anxiety, and tension) yet needed to coordinate their actions to ensure a safe evacuation. We draw on this data to develop a collective sensemaking model that details the auxiliary process steps and multimodal communication – verbal, para‐verbal, and non‐verbal cues – actors use to alternately frame emotional states and convey task‐related information. Our model demonstrates how actors, through multimodal collective sensemaking, overcome the challenges posed by cognitive disparities and distracting emotions in extreme contexts. It thus adds a dynamic emotive and bodily perspective to the predominantly cognitive and verbal understanding in sensemaking theory, and also has implications for practitioners working in extreme contexts.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142219996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Getting Down to Business: Governing the Hybridization of UK Charities 着手开展业务:管理英国慈善机构的混合化
IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13136
Kevin Curran, Pinar Ozcan
Charity organizations are important to solving complex social and environmental issues that are beyond the reach of government and commercial organizations. However, these organizations are under increasing pressure for survival due to a sharp decrease in their traditional sources of funding. This study examines how leaders of charity organizations can improve the financial security and impact of their organization by adopting commercial structures into their organization, and therefore undergoing a process of hybridization. We conducted a multiple comparative case study of 18 UK charities comparing how they engaged with emerging social finance funding opportunities that required them to adopt commercial structures which lay outside their dominant logic of action. We identified several aspects that influenced the likelihood of a charity organization to engage with this opportunity and, therefore, strategically hybridize. These included whether a charity executive had sufficient socialization in both the social and commercial logics to view social finance as a strategic opportunity and whether the organization could alter the role expectations of trustees with a commercial background to enable them to actively use both logics rather than compartmentalizing them in their decision‐making. Our findings have important implications for research streams on hybridization and hybrid governance.
慈善组织对于解决政府和商业组织无法解决的复杂社会和环境问题非常重要。然而,由于传统的资金来源急剧减少,这些组织面临着越来越大的生存压力。本研究探讨了慈善组织的领导者如何通过在其组织中采用商业结构,从而经历一个混合化的过程,来提高其组织的财务安全和影响力。我们对英国的 18 家慈善机构进行了多重比较案例研究,比较了它们如何利用新兴的社会融资机会,这些机会要求它们采用超出其主导行动逻辑的商业结构。我们发现,有几个方面会影响慈善组织参与这种机会的可能性,从而影响其战略混合。这些方面包括:慈善机构的高管是否在社会和商业逻辑方面都有足够的社会化经验,从而将社会融资视为一个战略机遇;慈善机构是否能够改变对有商业背景的受托人的角色期望,使他们能够积极利用这两种逻辑,而不是在决策中将其割裂开来。我们的研究结果对有关混合和混合治理的研究具有重要意义。
{"title":"Getting Down to Business: Governing the Hybridization of UK Charities","authors":"Kevin Curran, Pinar Ozcan","doi":"10.1111/joms.13136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13136","url":null,"abstract":"Charity organizations are important to solving complex social and environmental issues that are beyond the reach of government and commercial organizations. However, these organizations are under increasing pressure for survival due to a sharp decrease in their traditional sources of funding. This study examines how leaders of charity organizations can improve the financial security and impact of their organization by adopting commercial structures into their organization, and therefore undergoing a process of hybridization. We conducted a multiple comparative case study of 18 UK charities comparing how they engaged with emerging social finance funding opportunities that required them to adopt commercial structures which lay outside their dominant logic of action. We identified several aspects that influenced the likelihood of a charity organization to engage with this opportunity and, therefore, strategically hybridize. These included whether a charity executive had sufficient socialization in both the social and commercial logics to view social finance as a strategic opportunity and whether the organization could alter the role expectations of trustees with a commercial background to enable them to actively use both logics rather than compartmentalizing them in their decision‐making. Our findings have important implications for research streams on hybridization and hybrid governance.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142220006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘From the Ivory Tower’? Memory Workers and Mnemonic Practices in Communities 来自象牙塔"?社区中的记忆工作者和记忆实践
IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13135
Yasaman Sadeghi
Memory work involves mnemonic practices such as remembering, forgetting, and enactment of the past to address past wrongdoing, foster future action, and contribute to a sense of belonging. Working with diversity and plurality of memories, however, necessitates confronting the underlying politico‐ethical considerations and struggles when memory work transcends organizational bounds. This study focuses on the viewpoints of memory workers in communities in order to theorize the various possibilities and limitations of memory work as such. In this work, the politico‐ethical tensions are evident between the requirements of practicing an occupation and those of the communities, who in turn exhibit hierarchies, conflicts, and diversity within and between themselves. I suggest that taking a community‐centric approach to memory work can serve the dynamic integrity of memories, and foster community engagement and empowerment. Memory workers, then, can account for the politico‐ethical struggles over memories by orchestrating interpretive, open, and embodied mnemonic practices to remain in tune with the diverse, disputed, polyvocal, and ever‐unfolding memories. The contributions of this paper carry implications for a more pluralistic and dynamic approach to memory work, suited to our times marked by increased historical consciousness, rival memories, and fierce debates over what and how must be remembered.
记忆工作涉及记忆性实践,如记忆、遗忘和颁布过去,以处理过去的不法行为,促进未来的行动,并增强归属感。然而,当记忆工作超越组织界限时,就必须面对潜在的政治伦理考虑和斗争。本研究侧重于社区记忆工作者的观点,以便从理论上说明记忆工作的各种可能性和局限性。在这项工作中,从事一项职业的要求与社区的要求之间存在着明显的政治伦理紧张关系,而社区内部和社区之间又表现出等级制度、冲突和多样性。我认为,以社区为中心的记忆工作方法可以促进记忆的动态完整性,促进社区参与和赋权。因此,记忆工作者可以通过协调解释性、开放性和体现性的记忆实践,与多样化、有争议、多声部和不断发展的记忆保持一致,从而对记忆的政治伦理斗争做出解释。本文的贡献对于以一种更加多元和动态的方式开展记忆工作具有重要意义,这种方式适合于我们这个以历史意识的增强、相互对立的记忆以及关于必须记忆什么和如何记忆的激烈争论为特征的时代。
{"title":"‘From the Ivory Tower’? Memory Workers and Mnemonic Practices in Communities","authors":"Yasaman Sadeghi","doi":"10.1111/joms.13135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13135","url":null,"abstract":"Memory work involves mnemonic practices such as remembering, forgetting, and enactment of the past to address past wrongdoing, foster future action, and contribute to a sense of belonging. Working with diversity and plurality of memories, however, necessitates confronting the underlying politico‐ethical considerations and struggles when memory work transcends organizational bounds. This study focuses on the viewpoints of memory workers in communities in order to theorize the various possibilities and limitations of memory work as such. In this work, the politico‐ethical tensions are evident between the requirements of practicing an occupation and those of the communities, who in turn exhibit hierarchies, conflicts, and diversity within and between themselves. I suggest that taking a community‐centric approach to memory work can serve the dynamic integrity of memories, and foster community engagement and empowerment. Memory workers, then, can account for the politico‐ethical struggles over memories by orchestrating interpretive, open, and embodied mnemonic practices to remain in tune with the diverse, disputed, polyvocal, and ever‐unfolding memories. The contributions of this paper carry implications for a more pluralistic and dynamic approach to memory work, suited to our times marked by increased historical consciousness, rival memories, and fierce debates over what and how must be remembered.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142220008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Political Side of Social Enterprises: A Phenomenon‐Based Study of Sociocultural and Policy Advocacy 社会企业的政治层面:基于社会文化和政策倡导现象的研究
IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13134
Johanna Mair, Nikolas Rathert
This study explores the often‐overlooked political dimension of social enterprises, particularly their advocacy activities aimed at influencing public policy, legislation, norms, attitudes, and behaviour. While traditional management research has focused on commercial activity and the beneficiary‐oriented aspects of social enterprises, this paper considers their upstream political activity. Using a phenomenon‐based approach, we analyse original survey data from 718 social enterprises across seven countries and six problem domains to identify factors associated with their engagement in advocacy. Our findings reveal that public spending and competition in social enterprises’ problem domains, as well as their governance choices – legal form, sources of income, and collaborations – are significantly associated with advocacy activities. We propose a new theoretical framework to understand these dynamics, positioning social enterprises as key players in markets for public purpose. This research underscores the importance of recognizing the political activities of social enterprises and offers new insights for studying hybrid organizing and organizations that address complex societal challenges. By highlighting the integral role of advocacy, our study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of how social enterprises drive social change, not only through direct service provision but also by shaping the broader sociopolitical environment.
本研究探讨了社会企业经常被忽视的政治层面,特别是其旨在影响公共政策、立法、规范、态度和行为的宣传活动。传统的管理研究侧重于社会企业的商业活动和以受益者为导向的方面,而本文则考虑了它们的上游政治活动。我们采用基于现象的方法,分析了来自 7 个国家和 6 个问题领域的 718 家社会企业的原始调查数据,以确定与这些企业参与倡导活动相关的因素。我们的研究结果表明,社会企业问题领域的公共支出和竞争,以及它们的治理选择--法律形式、收入来源和合作--都与宣传活动有显著关联。我们提出了一个新的理论框架来理解这些动态变化,将社会企业定位为公共目的市场的关键参与者。这项研究强调了认识社会企业政治活动的重要性,并为研究混合组织和应对复杂社会挑战的组织提供了新的见解。通过强调宣传的不可或缺的作用,我们的研究有助于更全面地理解社会企业如何推动社会变革,不仅通过直接提供服务,而且通过塑造更广泛的社会政治环境。
{"title":"The Political Side of Social Enterprises: A Phenomenon‐Based Study of Sociocultural and Policy Advocacy","authors":"Johanna Mair, Nikolas Rathert","doi":"10.1111/joms.13134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13134","url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the often‐overlooked political dimension of social enterprises, particularly their advocacy activities aimed at influencing public policy, legislation, norms, attitudes, and behaviour. While traditional management research has focused on commercial activity and the beneficiary‐oriented aspects of social enterprises, this paper considers their upstream political activity. Using a phenomenon‐based approach, we analyse original survey data from 718 social enterprises across seven countries and six problem domains to identify factors associated with their engagement in advocacy. Our findings reveal that public spending and competition in social enterprises’ problem domains, as well as their governance choices – legal form, sources of income, and collaborations – are significantly associated with advocacy activities. We propose a new theoretical framework to understand these dynamics, positioning social enterprises as key players in markets for public purpose. This research underscores the importance of recognizing the political activities of social enterprises and offers new insights for studying hybrid organizing and organizations that address complex societal challenges. By highlighting the integral role of advocacy, our study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of how social enterprises drive social change, not only through direct service provision but also by shaping the broader sociopolitical environment.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142220007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why a Little Diversity doesn't Go a Long Way: A Collective Moral Licensing Explanation for Homosocial Reproduction 为什么 "多样性不足"?同性繁殖的集体道德许可解释
IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13132
B. Parker Ellen, Jennifer C. Sexton, Marla Baskerville Watkins
Despite significant knowledge on the demographic composition of workgroups, the literature lacks group‐level theory that addresses the tendency of work groups with token levels of diversity to maintain their demographic imbalance over time. We explain this phenomenon by extending moral licensing theory to the group level, arguing that a token level of racial or gender diversity leads to the development of a collective moral credential. This credential provides psychological permission for groups to relax their moral strivings, such that they are less likely to question the influence of bias in group member selection decisions, and thus more likely to make subsequent homogenous group member additions. Additionally, we argue that the diversity climates within which groups are embedded can either magnify (i.e., in fairness‐focused diversity climates) or mitigate (i.e., in synergy‐focused diversity climates) the development of a collective moral credential. Further, we suggest that the effect of token levels of diversity on the development of a collective moral credential can be affected by the prevailing social norms for diversity. Finally, we theorize that the effects of this process can be accentuated by group use of a majority decision rule and attenuated by group use of a unanimous decision rule.
尽管对工作组的人口构成有了大量了解,但文献中缺乏群体层面的理论来解决具有象征性多样性水平的工作组随着时间的推移保持其人口失衡的趋势。我们通过将道德许可理论扩展到群体层面来解释这一现象,认为象征性的种族或性别多样性水平会导致集体道德证书的发展。这种证书为群体放松道德要求提供了心理许可,使他们不太可能质疑群体成员选择决策中偏见的影响,从而更有可能在随后增加同质化的群体成员。此外,我们还认为,群体所处的多样性氛围可以放大(即在注重公平的多样性氛围中)或减轻(即在注重协同的多样性氛围中)集体道德资质的发展。此外,我们还认为,象征性的多样性水平对集体道德资质发展的影响可能会受到现行多样性社会规范的影响。最后,我们从理论上认为,这一过程的影响会因群体采用多数决定规则而加剧,因群体采用一致决定规则而减弱。
{"title":"Why a Little Diversity doesn't Go a Long Way: A Collective Moral Licensing Explanation for Homosocial Reproduction","authors":"B. Parker Ellen, Jennifer C. Sexton, Marla Baskerville Watkins","doi":"10.1111/joms.13132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13132","url":null,"abstract":"Despite significant knowledge on the demographic composition of workgroups, the literature lacks group‐level theory that addresses the tendency of work groups with token levels of diversity to maintain their demographic imbalance over time. We explain this phenomenon by extending moral licensing theory to the group level, arguing that a token level of racial or gender diversity leads to the development of a collective moral credential. This credential provides psychological permission for groups to relax their moral strivings, such that they are less likely to question the influence of bias in group member selection decisions, and thus more likely to make subsequent homogenous group member additions. Additionally, we argue that the diversity climates within which groups are embedded can either magnify (i.e., in fairness‐focused diversity climates) or mitigate (i.e., in synergy‐focused diversity climates) the development of a collective moral credential. Further, we suggest that the effect of token levels of diversity on the development of a collective moral credential can be affected by the prevailing social norms for diversity. Finally, we theorize that the effects of this process can be accentuated by group use of a majority decision rule and attenuated by group use of a unanimous decision rule.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141969846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Management Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1