Effect of foot strike patterns and cutting angles on knee kinematics and kinetics during side-cutting maneuvers.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Wenxing Zhou, Yujie Qi, Mengjun Liu, Chengpang Hsiao, Lin Wang
{"title":"Effect of foot strike patterns and cutting angles on knee kinematics and kinetics during side-cutting maneuvers.","authors":"Wenxing Zhou, Yujie Qi, Mengjun Liu, Chengpang Hsiao, Lin Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cutting maneuvers are important actions in multidirectional sports but associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different foot strike patterns and cutting angles on knee kinematics and kinetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy male team sports athletes performed cuts with maximum speed at three angles (45, 90 and 135°) with different foot strike patterns (rearfoot strike [RFS] and forefoot strike [FFS]). A three-dimensional motion capture system combined with a force plate was used to collect makers trajectory and ground reaction force (GRF). Vertical GRF, and knee joint angles and moments were compared among these cutting tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of foot strike patterns, increased knee flexion angle, knee valgus moment, and knee internal rotation moment were observed during cutting to sharper angles (p < 0.001). At 90 and 135°, the FFS condition remained in a varus position and showed lower knee flexion moment than the RFS condition ( p ≤ 0.004). However, no significant differences in knee kinematic and kinetic variables were found between foot strike patterns during cutting to 45°.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that sharper cutting angles potentially increase the risk of ACL injury. Compared with the RFS pattern, the FFS pattern induces a slight knee varus angle and a lower knee flexion moment at sharper angles, which might further reduce the load placed on the knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cutting maneuvers are important actions in multidirectional sports but associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different foot strike patterns and cutting angles on knee kinematics and kinetics.

Methods: Twenty healthy male team sports athletes performed cuts with maximum speed at three angles (45, 90 and 135°) with different foot strike patterns (rearfoot strike [RFS] and forefoot strike [FFS]). A three-dimensional motion capture system combined with a force plate was used to collect makers trajectory and ground reaction force (GRF). Vertical GRF, and knee joint angles and moments were compared among these cutting tasks.

Results: Regardless of foot strike patterns, increased knee flexion angle, knee valgus moment, and knee internal rotation moment were observed during cutting to sharper angles (p < 0.001). At 90 and 135°, the FFS condition remained in a varus position and showed lower knee flexion moment than the RFS condition ( p ≤ 0.004). However, no significant differences in knee kinematic and kinetic variables were found between foot strike patterns during cutting to 45°.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that sharper cutting angles potentially increase the risk of ACL injury. Compared with the RFS pattern, the FFS pattern induces a slight knee varus angle and a lower knee flexion moment at sharper angles, which might further reduce the load placed on the knee.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在侧切动作中,脚的击球模式和切入角度对膝关节运动学和动力学的影响。
目的:切入动作是多向运动中的重要动作,但与非接触性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤有关。本研究旨在探究不同的脚踏模式和切入角度对膝关节运动学和动力学的影响:方法:20 名健康的男子团队运动运动员以最大速度在三个角度(45、90 和 135°)以不同的脚部击球模式(后脚掌击球[RFS]和前脚掌击球[FFS])进行切削。三维运动捕捉系统与测力板相结合,用于收集运动者的运动轨迹和地面反作用力(GRF)。对这些切割任务的垂直反作用力、膝关节角度和力矩进行了比较:无论脚的打击模式如何,在切削到更大角度时,膝关节屈曲角、膝关节外翻力矩和膝关节内旋力矩都有所增加(p < 0.001)。在90°和135°时,FFS状态保持在屈曲位置,膝关节屈曲力矩低于RFS状态(P≤0.004)。然而,在切削到45°时,不同的脚着地模式在膝关节运动学和动力学变量方面没有发现明显差异:这些研究结果表明,更锋利的切入角度可能会增加前交叉韧带损伤的风险。与 RFS 模式相比,FFS 模式在更大的角度下会引起轻微的膝关节曲张角和更低的膝关节屈曲力矩,这可能会进一步减轻膝关节所承受的负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of biomaterials with reference to biocompatibility dedicated for patient-specific finger implants Dynamic-passive correction of hallux valgus and associated static foot deformities Quantitative evaluation of stereoscopic augmented reality visualization using an optical see-through head-mounted display Analysis of Muscle Activity During Rowing Stroke Phases Experimental research of energy absorbing structures within helmet samples made with the additive manufacturing method - preliminary study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1