Comparison of the optoelectronic BTS Smart system and IMU-based MyoMotion system for the assessment of gait variables.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Amadeusz Bartoszek, Artur Struzik, Sebastian Jaroszczuk, Marek Woźniewski, Bogdan Pietraszewski
{"title":"Comparison of the optoelectronic BTS Smart system and IMU-based MyoMotion system for the assessment of gait variables.","authors":"Amadeusz Bartoszek, Artur Struzik, Sebastian Jaroszczuk, Marek Woźniewski, Bogdan Pietraszewski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based systems have been validated against optoelectronic systems for recording joint kinematics, the accuracy of each system must be evaluated, and measurements from different systems cannot be easily compared. Therefore, this study compared the joint angles recorded using the IMU-based MyoMotion system and the optoelectronic BTS Smart-DX 700 system during Nordic walking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study subject, a long-time Nordic walking instructor, was assigned to walk 12 m/trial (14 trials with 5 sampled gait cycles) at a velocity preferred for Nordic walking. The trials were simultaneously recorded by both systems. The instantaneous lower (ankle, knee, hip) and upper (shoulder, elbow, wrist) limb joint angles were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The joint angles from MyoMotion were significantly larger or smaller (depending on the joint and plane) than those from BTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Joint angles measured by MyoMotion are not interchangeable with values from BTS, and IMU-recorded values should be interpreted carefully. However, MyoMotion can still provide information about intra-individual changes based on the joint angle profiles, e.g., following Nordic walking training.</p>","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based systems have been validated against optoelectronic systems for recording joint kinematics, the accuracy of each system must be evaluated, and measurements from different systems cannot be easily compared. Therefore, this study compared the joint angles recorded using the IMU-based MyoMotion system and the optoelectronic BTS Smart-DX 700 system during Nordic walking.

Methods: The study subject, a long-time Nordic walking instructor, was assigned to walk 12 m/trial (14 trials with 5 sampled gait cycles) at a velocity preferred for Nordic walking. The trials were simultaneously recorded by both systems. The instantaneous lower (ankle, knee, hip) and upper (shoulder, elbow, wrist) limb joint angles were recorded.

Results: The joint angles from MyoMotion were significantly larger or smaller (depending on the joint and plane) than those from BTS.

Conclusions: Joint angles measured by MyoMotion are not interchangeable with values from BTS, and IMU-recorded values should be interpreted carefully. However, MyoMotion can still provide information about intra-individual changes based on the joint angle profiles, e.g., following Nordic walking training.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光电 BTS Smart 系统与基于 IMU 的 MyoMotion 系统在步态变量评估方面的比较。
目的:尽管基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的系统与光电系统在记录关节运动学方面进行了验证,但必须对每个系统的准确性进行评估,而且不同系统的测量结果不易比较。因此,本研究比较了使用基于 IMU 的 MyoMotion 系统和光电 BTS Smart-DX 700 系统在北欧式行走过程中记录的关节角度:研究对象是一名长期从事北欧式行走的教练,他被指定以北欧式行走的首选速度行走 12 米/次(14 次试验,5 个采样步态周期)。试验由两个系统同时记录。记录瞬时下肢(踝关节、膝关节、髋关节)和上肢(肩关节、肘关节、腕关节)关节角度:结果:MyoMotion 测量的关节角度明显大于或小于 BTS 测量的关节角度(取决于关节和平面):结论:MyoMotion 测得的关节角度不能与 BTS 测得的值互换,应谨慎解释 IMU 记录的值。不过,MyoMotion 仍能根据关节角度曲线提供个体内部变化的信息,例如北欧式行走训练后的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of biomaterials with reference to biocompatibility dedicated for patient-specific finger implants Dynamic-passive correction of hallux valgus and associated static foot deformities Quantitative evaluation of stereoscopic augmented reality visualization using an optical see-through head-mounted display Analysis of Muscle Activity During Rowing Stroke Phases Experimental research of energy absorbing structures within helmet samples made with the additive manufacturing method - preliminary study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1