The lingering challenge: addressing vaccine hesitancy in a post-pandemic world.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Central European journal of public health Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.21101/cejph.a7593
Ethan Ayaan Mir
{"title":"The lingering challenge: addressing vaccine hesitancy in a post-pandemic world.","authors":"Ethan Ayaan Mir","doi":"10.21101/cejph.a7593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Last time the world faced a deadly pandemic was the H1N1 Spanish flu in 1918, which affected almost one-third of the world's population (500 million people). Since then, almost 100 years later, we are now facing another pandemic of the SARS-CoV2 virus (COVID-19), which is still endemic to this day. As the technology evolved during those 100 years, an effective vaccine for COVID-19 was produced within only a year, a huge feat. But, unfortunately, due to its fast development, another force would arise limiting the impact of the vaccine: vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaxxers, which John Hopkins and the World Health Organization call the biggest current threat to global health. From politics to social media, it is clear that there has been a rapid spread of misinformation, resulting in hesitancy, especially from sociopolitically motivated people popularly referred to as anti-vaxxers. However, a second group of vaccine-hesitant people have also emerged, who are uneducated and remain undecided about vaccination mostly due to safety concerns. They come under the massive influence of anti-vaxxers and anti-vaccine propaganda through social media and politicians, which often make bold claims and huge headlines. To combat vaccine hesitancy, it is crucial that we debunk these conspiracy theories and misinformation that so many believe in, with factual, data-based information. Actively spreading correct information about the vaccines, such as disclosing the rigorous developmental processes and validation of safety data by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), assurance for the unlikeliness of getting a lethal side effect along with tremendous health benefits, will encourage people for safe vaccination against COVID-19 and other potential infectious diseases in the future. This article discusses the role of anti-vaxxers and vaccine-hesitant groups, electronic social media, and politics in vaccine hesitancy among people. It describes the strategies to combat the roadblocks in the vaccination programmes and health benefits, offered by recent advances in scientific and technological developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9823,"journal":{"name":"Central European journal of public health","volume":"31 4","pages":"296-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a7593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Last time the world faced a deadly pandemic was the H1N1 Spanish flu in 1918, which affected almost one-third of the world's population (500 million people). Since then, almost 100 years later, we are now facing another pandemic of the SARS-CoV2 virus (COVID-19), which is still endemic to this day. As the technology evolved during those 100 years, an effective vaccine for COVID-19 was produced within only a year, a huge feat. But, unfortunately, due to its fast development, another force would arise limiting the impact of the vaccine: vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaxxers, which John Hopkins and the World Health Organization call the biggest current threat to global health. From politics to social media, it is clear that there has been a rapid spread of misinformation, resulting in hesitancy, especially from sociopolitically motivated people popularly referred to as anti-vaxxers. However, a second group of vaccine-hesitant people have also emerged, who are uneducated and remain undecided about vaccination mostly due to safety concerns. They come under the massive influence of anti-vaxxers and anti-vaccine propaganda through social media and politicians, which often make bold claims and huge headlines. To combat vaccine hesitancy, it is crucial that we debunk these conspiracy theories and misinformation that so many believe in, with factual, data-based information. Actively spreading correct information about the vaccines, such as disclosing the rigorous developmental processes and validation of safety data by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), assurance for the unlikeliness of getting a lethal side effect along with tremendous health benefits, will encourage people for safe vaccination against COVID-19 and other potential infectious diseases in the future. This article discusses the role of anti-vaxxers and vaccine-hesitant groups, electronic social media, and politics in vaccine hesitancy among people. It describes the strategies to combat the roadblocks in the vaccination programmes and health benefits, offered by recent advances in scientific and technological developments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挥之不去的挑战:在大流行后的世界中解决疫苗犹豫不决的问题。
上一次世界面临致命的大流行病是 1918 年的 H1N1 西班牙流感,它影响了全世界近三分之一的人口(5 亿人)。从那时起,将近 100 年后,我们又面临着 SARS-CoV2 病毒(COVID-19)的大流行,这种病毒至今仍在流行。在这 100 年中,随着技术的发展,COVID-19 的有效疫苗在短短一年内就被生产出来,这是一项巨大的成就。但不幸的是,由于疫苗的快速发展,另一股限制疫苗影响力的力量出现了:疫苗犹豫和反疫苗者,约翰-霍普金斯大学和世界卫生组织将其称为当前全球健康的最大威胁。从政治到社交媒体,很明显,错误信息迅速传播,导致人们犹豫不决,尤其是那些出于社会政治动机的人,即俗称的反疫苗者。然而,第二类对疫苗犹豫不决的人也出现了,他们没有受过教育,主要出于安全考虑而对疫苗接种犹豫不决。他们受到反疫苗接种者的巨大影响,并通过社交媒体和政客进行反疫苗宣传,而这些宣传往往会提出大胆的主张和巨大的标题。为了消除对疫苗的犹豫不决,我们必须用基于事实和数据的信息来揭穿这些让很多人深信不疑的阴谋论和错误信息。积极传播有关疫苗的正确信息,如披露严格的研发过程和食品药品管理局 (FDA) 对安全性数据的验证,保证不会出现致命的副作用以及巨大的健康益处,这将鼓励人们在未来安全接种疫苗,预防 COVID-19 和其他潜在的传染性疾病。本文讨论了反疫苗接种者和疫苗恐慌团体、电子社交媒体和政治在人们对疫苗犹豫不决中所起的作用。文章介绍了应对疫苗接种计划中的障碍的策略以及近期科技发展所带来的健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European journal of public health
Central European journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original articles on disease prevention and health protection, environmental impacts on health, the role of nutrition in health promotion, results of population health studies and critiques of specific health issues including intervention measures such as vaccination and its effectiveness. The review articles are targeted at providing up-to-date information in the sphere of public health. The Journal is geographically targeted at the European region but will accept specialised articles from foreign sources that contribute to public health issues also applicable to the European cultural milieu.
期刊最新文献
A post-pandemic trend in the consumption of dietary supplements among residents of Lithuania. Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia. Course and complications of influenza A in seniors over 65 years of age. Impact of climate on varicella distribution in Bulgaria (2009-2018). Mediterranean diet adherence in 9-years old children: a cross-sectional study in the part of the Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1