Combined free-running four-dimensional anatomical and flow magnetic resonance imaging with native contrast using Synchronization of Neighboring Acquisitions by Physiological Signals.

Abstract

Background: Four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often relies on the injection of gadolinium- or iron-oxide-based contrast agents to improve vessel delineation. In this work, a novel technique is developed to acquire and reconstruct 4D flow data with excellent dynamic visualization of blood vessels but without the need for contrast injection. Synchronization of Neighboring Acquisitions by Physiological Signals (SyNAPS) uses pilot tone (PT) navigation to retrospectively synchronize the reconstruction of two free-running three-dimensional radial acquisitions, to create co-registered anatomy and flow images.

Methods: Thirteen volunteers and two Marfan syndrome patients were scanned without contrast agent using one free-running fast interrupted steady-state (FISS) sequence and one free-running phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) sequence. PT signals spanning the two sequences were recorded for retrospective respiratory motion correction and cardiac binning. The magnitude and phase images reconstructed, respectively, from FISS and PC-MRI, were synchronized to create SyNAPS 4D flow datasets. Conventional two-dimensional (2D) flow data were acquired for reference in ascending (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). The blood-to-myocardium contrast ratio, dynamic vessel area, net volume, and peak flow were used to compare SyNAPS 4D flow with Native 4D flow (without FISS information) and 2D flow. A score of 0-4 was given to each dataset by two blinded experts regarding the feasibility of performing vessel delineation.

Results: Blood-to-myocardium contrast ratio for SyNAPS 4D flow magnitude images (1.5 ± 0.3) was significantly higher than for Native 4D flow (0.7 ± 0.1, p < 0.01) and was comparable to 2D flow (2.3 ± 0.9, p = 0.02). Image quality scores of SyNAPS 4D flow from the experts (M.P.: 1.9 ± 0.3, E.T.: 2.5 ± 0.5) were overall significantly higher than the scores from Native 4D flow (M.P.: 1.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.03, E.T.: 0.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.01) but still significantly lower than the scores from the reference 2D flow datasets (M.P.: 2.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.01, E.T.: 3.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient between the dynamic vessel area measured on SyNAPS 4D flow and that from 2D flow was 0.69 ± 0.24 for the AAo and 0.83 ± 0.10 for the DAo, whereas the Pearson correlation between Native 4D flow and 2D flow measurements was 0.12 ± 0.48 for the AAo and 0.08 ± 0.39 for the DAo. Linear correlations between SyNAPS 4D flow and 2D flow measurements of net volume (r² = 0.83) and peak flow (r² = 0.87) were larger than the correlations between Native 4D flow and 2D flow measurements of net volume (r² = 0.79) and peak flow (r² = 0.76).

Conclusion: The feasibility and utility of SyNAPS were demonstrated for joint whole-heart anatomical and flow MRI without requiring electrocardiography gating, respiratory navigators, or contrast agents. Using SyNAPS, a high-contrast anatomical imaging sequence can be used to improve 4D flow measurements that often suffer from poor delineation of vessel boundaries in the absence of contrast agents.