Prescription Pain Reliever Misuse Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults.

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Transgender health Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1089/trgh.2022.0059
Leonardo Kattari, Haley Hill, Deirdre A Shires, Lucas R Prieto, Ishaan K Modi, Brayden A Misiolek, Shanna K Kattari
{"title":"Prescription Pain Reliever Misuse Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults.","authors":"Leonardo Kattari, Haley Hill, Deirdre A Shires, Lucas R Prieto, Ishaan K Modi, Brayden A Misiolek, Shanna K Kattari","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2022.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Little is known about the prevalence and risks associated with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons' misuse of prescription pain relievers (PPRs). This study explores the relationship between PPR misuse and various sociodemographic identities and experiences of discrimination in health care among TGD adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TGD participants (<i>n</i>=595) were recruited in 2018 to participate in a cross-sectional statewide trans health survey through convenience sampling. Chi-square tests of independence and logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between sociodemographics and experiences of discrimination among persons who had ever misused PPRs, or who had misused PPRs in the past year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sociodemographics such as gender identity (odds ratio [OR]=0.44, <i>p</i>=0.01), race/ethnicity (OR=0.14, <i>p</i><0.001), and sexual orientation influence TGD individuals likeliness of misusing PPRs (OR=0.40, <i>p</i><0.001). Notably, those who were ever diagnosed with anxiety had a higher likeliness of having lifetime PPR misuse compared with those who were never diagnosed (OR=2.05, <i>p</i>=0.05), and those reporting past-year discrimination within the mental health care setting because of their gender identity were more than twice as likely to report past-year misuse than those who reported not experiencing it (OR=2.43, <i>p</i>=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Certain subpopulations of TGD individuals may be at elevated risk of PPR misuse. It is imperative to acknowledge the impact of multimarginalized identities as well as differences across various identities and experiences within the TGD community while working to address non-PPR misuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":94256,"journal":{"name":"Transgender health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10835153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2022.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Little is known about the prevalence and risks associated with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons' misuse of prescription pain relievers (PPRs). This study explores the relationship between PPR misuse and various sociodemographic identities and experiences of discrimination in health care among TGD adults.

Methods: TGD participants (n=595) were recruited in 2018 to participate in a cross-sectional statewide trans health survey through convenience sampling. Chi-square tests of independence and logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between sociodemographics and experiences of discrimination among persons who had ever misused PPRs, or who had misused PPRs in the past year.

Results: Sociodemographics such as gender identity (odds ratio [OR]=0.44, p=0.01), race/ethnicity (OR=0.14, p<0.001), and sexual orientation influence TGD individuals likeliness of misusing PPRs (OR=0.40, p<0.001). Notably, those who were ever diagnosed with anxiety had a higher likeliness of having lifetime PPR misuse compared with those who were never diagnosed (OR=2.05, p=0.05), and those reporting past-year discrimination within the mental health care setting because of their gender identity were more than twice as likely to report past-year misuse than those who reported not experiencing it (OR=2.43, p=0.004).

Conclusion: Certain subpopulations of TGD individuals may be at elevated risk of PPR misuse. It is imperative to acknowledge the impact of multimarginalized identities as well as differences across various identities and experiences within the TGD community while working to address non-PPR misuse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变性和性别多元化成年人中滥用止痛药的情况。
目的:人们对变性者和性别多元化者(TGD)滥用处方止痛药(PPRs)的普遍性和相关风险知之甚少。本研究探讨了变性和性别多元化成年人滥用处方止痛药与各种社会人口身份和医疗保健歧视经历之间的关系:通过便利抽样,2018 年招募了 TGD 参与者(n=595)参加全州跨性别健康横断面调查。对曾经滥用过PPRs或在过去一年中滥用过PPRs的人进行了独立性的卡方检验和逻辑回归,以探讨社会人口统计学与歧视经历之间的关联:性别认同(几率比 [OR]=0.44,p=0.01)、种族/民族(OR=0.14,ppp=0.05)等社会人口统计学特征,以及报告过去一年在精神卫生保健环境中因性别认同而遭受歧视的人,报告过去一年滥用的可能性是报告未遭受歧视的人的两倍多(OR=2.43,p=0.004):结论:某些 TGD 亚人群滥用 PPR 的风险可能会升高。在努力解决非 PPR 滥用问题的同时,必须承认多边缘化身份的影响以及 TGD 群体中各种身份和经历的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Special Issue: Health Outcomes of Gender-Affirming Care Among Transgender and Gender Expansive Youth: Deadline for Manuscript Submission: September 17, 2024. Response to Ruggles and Cheung, Re: “Sublingual Estradiol Offers No Apparent Advantage Over Combined Oral Estradiol and Cyproterone Acetate for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy of Treatment-Naive Trans Women: Results of a Prospective Pilot Study” “I May Lose My Home, but I Won’t Lose Myself”: Assessing the Needs of Translatinas Experiencing Housing Instability in San Francisco and Elevating Their Visions for Change Through Participatory Research Letter to the Editor: Extending the Reach of Peer-Led Support Groups via Telehealth. A Review on Cervical Cancer Screening in Transgender Men: What Are the Particularities of This Approach?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1