Cultural and gender diversity for ESG performance towards knowledge sharing: empirical evidence from European banks

IF 6.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1108/jkm-05-2023-0445
Francesco Paolone, Matteo Pozzoli, Meghna Chhabra, Assunta Di Vaio
{"title":"Cultural and gender diversity for ESG performance towards knowledge sharing: empirical evidence from European banks","authors":"Francesco Paolone, Matteo Pozzoli, Meghna Chhabra, Assunta Di Vaio","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2023-0445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the effects of board cultural diversity (BCD) and board gender diversity (BGD) of the board of directors on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the European banking sector using resource-based view (RBV) theory. In addition, this study analyses the linkages between BCD and BGD and knowledge sharing on the board of directors to improve ESG performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study selected a sample of European-listed banks covering the period 2021. ESG and diversity variables were collected from Refinitiv Eikon and analysed using the ordinary least squares model. This study was conducted in the European context regulated by Directive 95/2014/EU, which requires sustainability disclosure. The original population was represented by 250 banks; after missing data were excluded, the final sample comprised 96 European-listed banks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings highlight the positive linkages between BGD, BCD and ESG scores in the European banking sector. In addition, the findings highlight that diversity contributes to knowledge sharing by improving ESG performance in a regulated sector. Nonetheless, the combined effect of BGD and BCD negatively impacts ESG performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to measure and analyse a regulated sector, such as banking, and the relationship between cultural and gender diversity for sharing knowledge under the RBV theory lens in the ESG framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-05-2023-0445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the effects of board cultural diversity (BCD) and board gender diversity (BGD) of the board of directors on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the European banking sector using resource-based view (RBV) theory. In addition, this study analyses the linkages between BCD and BGD and knowledge sharing on the board of directors to improve ESG performance.

Design/methodology/approach

This study selected a sample of European-listed banks covering the period 2021. ESG and diversity variables were collected from Refinitiv Eikon and analysed using the ordinary least squares model. This study was conducted in the European context regulated by Directive 95/2014/EU, which requires sustainability disclosure. The original population was represented by 250 banks; after missing data were excluded, the final sample comprised 96 European-listed banks.

Findings

The findings highlight the positive linkages between BGD, BCD and ESG scores in the European banking sector. In addition, the findings highlight that diversity contributes to knowledge sharing by improving ESG performance in a regulated sector. Nonetheless, the combined effect of BGD and BCD negatively impacts ESG performance.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to measure and analyse a regulated sector, such as banking, and the relationship between cultural and gender diversity for sharing knowledge under the RBV theory lens in the ESG framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化和性别多样性促进环境、社会和公司治理绩效与知识共享:欧洲银行的经验证据
目的本研究旨在利用基于资源的观点(RBV)理论,研究董事会文化多样性(BCD)和董事会性别多样性(BGD)对欧洲银行业环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效的影响。此外,本研究还分析了 BCD 和 BGD 与董事会知识共享之间的联系,以提高 ESG 绩效。ESG 和多样性变量由 Refinitiv Eikon 收集,并使用普通最小二乘法模型进行分析。本研究是在欧盟第 95/2014/EU 号指令要求披露可持续发展信息的背景下进行的。原始样本由 250 家银行组成;在剔除缺失数据后,最终样本由 96 家欧洲上市银行组成。此外,研究结果还强调,在受监管的行业中,多样性有助于提高环境、社会和公司治理绩效,从而促进知识共享。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项在 ESG 框架下,从 RBV 理论角度衡量和分析银行业等受监管行业以及文化和性别多样性与知识共享之间关系的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
15.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Knowledge Management covers all the key issues in its field including: ■Developing an appropriate culture and communication strategy ■Integrating learning and knowledge infrastructure ■Knowledge management and the learning organization ■Information organization and retrieval technologies for improving the quality of knowledge ■Linking knowledge management to performance initiatives ■Retaining knowledge - human and intellectual capital ■Using information technology to develop knowledge management ■Knowledge management and innovation ■Measuring the value of knowledge already within an organization ■What lies beyond knowledge management?
期刊最新文献
Impact of fit between knowledge potential and organizational routine updating on subsidiaries’ new product development performance Knowledge spillovers between R&D-driven incumbents and start-ups in open innovation: a systematic review and nomological network Digital knowledge management in agile self-tuning organisations: a multiple case study Unleashing cultural diversity knowledge for improved knowledge sharing and integration: an in-depth qualitative analysis AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1