Energy system changes in the agricultural sector: testing a value-congruent communication approach to foster positive attitudes

Madita Olvermann, Simone Kauffeld
{"title":"Energy system changes in the agricultural sector: testing a value-congruent communication approach to foster positive attitudes","authors":"Madita Olvermann, Simone Kauffeld","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad219a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Multiple sectors, including agriculture, are subject to decarbonization and wide-ranging system changes. With a growing distance between agriculture and the public, communicating changes and fostering public acceptance as crucial factors for the success of these changes has become challenging. Therefore, understanding public attitudes towards emerging system changes in unfamiliar sectors helps identify appropriate communication strategies and provides information about possible responses from different stakeholders. To address the scarcity of studies on system changes in agriculture and their acceptability, a multidimensional evaluation of attitudes was undertaken using a factorial survey to test the utility of value-congruent information for enhancing positive attitudes. Electrical field cultivation (EFC) served as a case example for one potential energy system change in agriculture. The data were collected via an open scientific survey panel in Germany (N = 300) using a written vignette in the form of a newspaper article; different benefit foci and hypotheses were tested using path analysis. Although the different benefit foci did not reveal significant differences, problem awareness and knowledge were found to predict positive attitudes toward EFC. For once, results highlight the need to foster overall problem awareness for fossil fuels to garner public support for various pathways. Additionally, results underscore the perceived lack of personal affectedness by transition pathways as a barrier to responding to communication strategies, specifically in unfamiliar sectors such as agriculture. The study outlines the need for stakeholders to design communication strategies under consideration of fostering personal affectedness and overall problem understanding.","PeriodicalId":505267,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"57 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad219a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sectors, including agriculture, are subject to decarbonization and wide-ranging system changes. With a growing distance between agriculture and the public, communicating changes and fostering public acceptance as crucial factors for the success of these changes has become challenging. Therefore, understanding public attitudes towards emerging system changes in unfamiliar sectors helps identify appropriate communication strategies and provides information about possible responses from different stakeholders. To address the scarcity of studies on system changes in agriculture and their acceptability, a multidimensional evaluation of attitudes was undertaken using a factorial survey to test the utility of value-congruent information for enhancing positive attitudes. Electrical field cultivation (EFC) served as a case example for one potential energy system change in agriculture. The data were collected via an open scientific survey panel in Germany (N = 300) using a written vignette in the form of a newspaper article; different benefit foci and hypotheses were tested using path analysis. Although the different benefit foci did not reveal significant differences, problem awareness and knowledge were found to predict positive attitudes toward EFC. For once, results highlight the need to foster overall problem awareness for fossil fuels to garner public support for various pathways. Additionally, results underscore the perceived lack of personal affectedness by transition pathways as a barrier to responding to communication strategies, specifically in unfamiliar sectors such as agriculture. The study outlines the need for stakeholders to design communication strategies under consideration of fostering personal affectedness and overall problem understanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业部门的能源系统变革:测试促进积极态度的价值一致性沟通方法
包括农业在内的多个部门都面临着去碳化和广泛的系统变革。随着农业与公众之间的距离越来越远,作为这些变革成功的关键因素,沟通变革和促进公众接受已成为一项挑战。因此,了解公众对陌生领域中新出现的系统变化的态度,有助于确定适当的沟通策略,并提供有关不同利益相关者可能做出的反应的信息。为了解决有关农业系统变革及其可接受性的研究稀缺的问题,我们采用因子调查法对态度进行了多维度评估,以检验价值一致的信息对增强积极态度的效用。电热田间栽培(EFC)是农业潜在能源系统变革的一个案例。数据是通过德国的一个开放式科学调查小组(N = 300)收集的,使用的是报纸文章形式的书面小故事;使用路径分析对不同的利益焦点和假设进行了测试。尽管不同的利益焦点并没有显示出明显的差异,但问题意识和知识被发现可以预测对 EFC 的积极态度。这一次,研究结果凸显出需要加强对化石燃料的整体问题意识,以争取公众对各种途径的支持。此外,研究结果还强调,人们对过渡途径缺乏切身感受,这也是对宣传策略做出回应的障碍,尤其是在农业等不熟悉的领域。本研究概述了利益相关者在设计传播策略时考虑促进个人受影响程度和对整体问题的理解的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What factors influence individuals' willingness to pay for environmental protection: Evidence from CGSS2021 Unlocking bioremediation potential: harnessing an indigenous bacterial consortium from effluent treatment plants for industrial wastewater treatment Household Air Pollution Disparities Between Socioeconomic Groups in Chicago An integrated expert recommender system approach to environmental service priorities in renewable energy Climatic characteristics of centennial and extreme precipitation in Hangzhou, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1