Intersectionality in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies: A Critical Review

A. Y. Zhang, Ge Gao
{"title":"Intersectionality in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies: A Critical Review","authors":"A. Y. Zhang, Ge Gao","doi":"10.21467/exr.4.1.5387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review article draws on key literature on intersectionality: theory, methodology, and empirical applications in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies. The review points out the urgent need to account for diverse learners’ intersectional identities (racial/ethnic backgrounds, gender, linguistic ability, citizenship status, and other social identity markers) and embrace a social-justice-oriented praxis in education. We argue that integrating the intersectionality framework with existing learning theories, methods (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed), and pedagogies is possible and necessary. Based on the critical review, we propose four recommendations for researchers and practitioners in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies: (a) staying faithful to the activism and liberatory commitment of intersectionality, (b) adopting appropriate method(s) and methodology with sound epistemological and axiological orientations, (c) reconceptualizing extant learning theories, which entails the re-thinking and validation of some education and psychological constructs, and (d) encouraging teaching and research on intersectionality and/or from an intersectional lens. The review article can serve as a guideline to incorporate intersectionality as theory and analytical framework. It is only through these practices that center intersectionality that we, as researchers and practitioners, become capable of creating a more equitable and inclusive learning environment from K-12 to Higher Education.","PeriodicalId":12196,"journal":{"name":"Extensive Reviews","volume":"62 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extensive Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21467/exr.4.1.5387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The review article draws on key literature on intersectionality: theory, methodology, and empirical applications in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies. The review points out the urgent need to account for diverse learners’ intersectional identities (racial/ethnic backgrounds, gender, linguistic ability, citizenship status, and other social identity markers) and embrace a social-justice-oriented praxis in education. We argue that integrating the intersectionality framework with existing learning theories, methods (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed), and pedagogies is possible and necessary. Based on the critical review, we propose four recommendations for researchers and practitioners in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies: (a) staying faithful to the activism and liberatory commitment of intersectionality, (b) adopting appropriate method(s) and methodology with sound epistemological and axiological orientations, (c) reconceptualizing extant learning theories, which entails the re-thinking and validation of some education and psychological constructs, and (d) encouraging teaching and research on intersectionality and/or from an intersectional lens. The review article can serve as a guideline to incorporate intersectionality as theory and analytical framework. It is only through these practices that center intersectionality that we, as researchers and practitioners, become capable of creating a more equitable and inclusive learning environment from K-12 to Higher Education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育心理学和课程研究中的交叉性:批判性评论
这篇评论文章借鉴了有关交叉性的主要文献:教育心理学和课程研究中的理论、方法和经验应用。综述指出,迫切需要考虑不同学习者的交叉性身份(种族/民族背景、性别、语言能力、公民身份和其他社会身份标志),并在教育中采用以社会公正为导向的实践。我们认为,将交叉性框架与现有的学习理论、方法(定量、定性和混合)以及教学法相结合是可能的,也是必要的。在评论文章的基础上,我们为教育心理学和课程研究领域的研究人员和从业人员提出了四项建议:(a)忠实于交叉性的行动主义和解放承诺;(b)采用具有合理的认识论和公理取向的适当方法和方法论;(c)重新认识现有的学习理论,这需要重新思考和验证一些教育和心理学建构;以及(d)鼓励关于交叉性和/或从交叉性视角进行教学和研究。这篇评论文章可以作为将交叉性作为理论和分析框架的指南。只有通过这些以交叉性为中心的实践,我们作为研究者和实践者才有能力创造一个从幼儿园到十二年级再到高等教育的更加公平和包容的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intersectionality in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies: A Critical Review Nigeria’s Foreign Policy and Insecurity: Addressing the Missing Links and Reoccurring Issues Differential Perspectives Between miRNA and lncRNA in Light of Biogenesis and Functions: A Review Quantum Control Modelling, Methods, and Applications A Systematic Review of Garlic and Ginger as Medicinal Spices against Viral Infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1