The muscle protein synthetic response following corn protein ingestion does not differ from milk protein in healthy, young adults.

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Amino Acids Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s00726-023-03377-z
Philippe J M Pinckaers, Michelle E G Weijzen, Lisanne H P Houben, Antoine H Zorenc, Imre W K Kouw, Lisette C P G M de Groot, Lex B Verdijk, Tim Snijders, Luc J C van Loon
{"title":"The muscle protein synthetic response following corn protein ingestion does not differ from milk protein in healthy, young adults.","authors":"Philippe J M Pinckaers, Michelle E G Weijzen, Lisanne H P Houben, Antoine H Zorenc, Imre W K Kouw, Lisette C P G M de Groot, Lex B Verdijk, Tim Snijders, Luc J C van Loon","doi":"10.1007/s00726-023-03377-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant-derived proteins are generally believed to possess lesser anabolic properties when compared with animal-derived proteins. This is, at least partly, attributed to the lower leucine content of most plant-derived proteins. Corn protein has a leucine content that is highest among most plant-derived proteins and it even exceeds the levels observed in animal-derived proteins such as whey protein. Therefore, this study aimed to compare muscle protein synthesis rates following the ingestion of 30 g corn protein and a 30 g blend of corn plus milk protein with 30 g milk protein. In a randomized, double blind, parallel-group design, 36 healthy young males (26 ± 4 y) received primed continuous L-[ring-<sup>13</sup>C<sub>6</sub>]-phenylalanine infusions and ingested 30 g corn protein (CORN), 30 g milk protein (MILK), or a 30 g proteinblend with 15 g corn plus 15 g milk protein (CORN + MILK). Blood and muscle biopsies were collected for 5 h following protein ingestion to assess post-prandial plasma amino acid profiles and myofibrillar protein synthesis rates. The results show that Ingestion of protein increased myofibrillar protein synthesis rates from basal post-absorptive values in all treatments(P < 0.001). Post-prandial myofibrillar protein synthesis rates did not differ between CORN vs MILK (0.053 ± 0.013 vs 0.053 ± 0.013%∙h<sup>-1</sup>, respectively; t-test P = 0.90), or between CORN + MILK vs MILK (0.052 ± 0.024 vs 0.053 ± 0.013%∙h<sup>-1</sup>, respectively; t-test P = 0.92). Ingestion of 30 g corn protein, 30 g milk protein, or a blend of 15 g corn plus 15 g milk protein robustly increases muscle protein synthesis rates in young males. The muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of 30 g corn-derived protein does not differ from the ingestion of an equivalent amount of milk protein in healthy, young males. Clinical Trial Registry number. NTR6548 (registration date: 27-06-2017) https://www.trialregister.nl/ .</p>","PeriodicalId":7810,"journal":{"name":"Amino Acids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10844360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amino Acids","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-023-03377-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-derived proteins are generally believed to possess lesser anabolic properties when compared with animal-derived proteins. This is, at least partly, attributed to the lower leucine content of most plant-derived proteins. Corn protein has a leucine content that is highest among most plant-derived proteins and it even exceeds the levels observed in animal-derived proteins such as whey protein. Therefore, this study aimed to compare muscle protein synthesis rates following the ingestion of 30 g corn protein and a 30 g blend of corn plus milk protein with 30 g milk protein. In a randomized, double blind, parallel-group design, 36 healthy young males (26 ± 4 y) received primed continuous L-[ring-13C6]-phenylalanine infusions and ingested 30 g corn protein (CORN), 30 g milk protein (MILK), or a 30 g proteinblend with 15 g corn plus 15 g milk protein (CORN + MILK). Blood and muscle biopsies were collected for 5 h following protein ingestion to assess post-prandial plasma amino acid profiles and myofibrillar protein synthesis rates. The results show that Ingestion of protein increased myofibrillar protein synthesis rates from basal post-absorptive values in all treatments(P < 0.001). Post-prandial myofibrillar protein synthesis rates did not differ between CORN vs MILK (0.053 ± 0.013 vs 0.053 ± 0.013%∙h-1, respectively; t-test P = 0.90), or between CORN + MILK vs MILK (0.052 ± 0.024 vs 0.053 ± 0.013%∙h-1, respectively; t-test P = 0.92). Ingestion of 30 g corn protein, 30 g milk protein, or a blend of 15 g corn plus 15 g milk protein robustly increases muscle protein synthesis rates in young males. The muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of 30 g corn-derived protein does not differ from the ingestion of an equivalent amount of milk protein in healthy, young males. Clinical Trial Registry number. NTR6548 (registration date: 27-06-2017) https://www.trialregister.nl/ .

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康的年轻成年人摄入玉米蛋白质后,肌肉蛋白质合成反应与牛奶蛋白质并无不同。
一般认为,与动物源性蛋白质相比,植物源性蛋白质的合成代谢特性较低。这至少部分归因于大多数植物来源蛋白质的亮氨酸含量较低。玉米蛋白的亮氨酸含量在大多数植物源性蛋白中是最高的,甚至超过了乳清蛋白等动物源性蛋白的含量。因此,本研究旨在比较摄入 30 克玉米蛋白和 30 克玉米加牛奶蛋白与 30 克牛奶蛋白混合蛋白后的肌肉蛋白质合成率。在随机、双盲、平行组设计中,36 名健康的年轻男性(26 ± 4 岁)连续接受 L-[环-13C6]-苯丙氨酸注射,并摄入 30 克玉米蛋白(CORN)、30 克牛奶蛋白(MILK)或含有 15 克玉米蛋白和 15 克牛奶蛋白的 30 克混合蛋白(CORN + MILK)。在摄入蛋白质后的 5 小时内收集血液和肌肉活组织切片,以评估餐后血浆氨基酸谱和肌纤维蛋白质合成率。结果显示,在所有处理中,摄入蛋白质都会提高肌纤维蛋白质合成率(P < 0.001),高于吸收后的基础值。餐后肌纤维蛋白质合成率在玉米与牛奶之间(分别为 0.053 ± 0.013 vs 0.053 ± 0.013%∙h-1;t 检验 P = 0.90),或在玉米+牛奶与牛奶之间(分别为 0.052 ± 0.024 vs 0.053 ± 0.013%∙h-1;t 检验 P = 0.92)没有差异。摄入 30 克玉米蛋白、30 克牛奶蛋白或 15 克玉米蛋白加 15 克牛奶蛋白的混合蛋白可显著提高年轻男性的肌肉蛋白合成率。对于健康的年轻男性来说,摄入 30 克玉米提取物蛋白质与摄入等量牛奶蛋白质的肌肉蛋白质合成反应并无不同。临床试验注册号。NTR6548(注册日期:2017-06-27) https://www.trialregister.nl/ 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Amino Acids
Amino Acids 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Amino Acids publishes contributions from all fields of amino acid and protein research: analysis, separation, synthesis, biosynthesis, cross linking amino acids, racemization/enantiomers, modification of amino acids as phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, glycosylation and nonenzymatic glycosylation, new roles for amino acids in physiology and pathophysiology, biology, amino acid analogues and derivatives, polyamines, radiated amino acids, peptides, stable isotopes and isotopes of amino acids. Applications in medicine, food chemistry, nutrition, gastroenterology, nephrology, neurochemistry, pharmacology, excitatory amino acids are just some of the topics covered. Fields of interest include: Biochemistry, food chemistry, nutrition, neurology, psychiatry, pharmacology, nephrology, gastroenterology, microbiology
期刊最新文献
Identification of amino acids metabolomic profiling in human plasma distinguishes lupus nephritis from systemic lupus erythematosus Evaluation of supplementary carnosine accumulation and distribution: an initial analysis of participants in the Nucleophilic Defense Against PM Toxicity (NEAT) clinical trial. Effect of weight loss interventions on metabolomic signatures in obese children with insulin resistance. Exploring the interplay between kidney function and urinary metabolites in young adults: the African-PREDICT study. N-carboxyacyl and N-α-aminoacyl derivatives of aminoaldehydes as shared substrates of plant aldehyde dehydrogenases 10 and 7.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1