Genetic Coupling of Mate Recognition Systems in the Genomic Era.

IF 6.9 2区 生物学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a041437
Michael G Ritchie, Roger K Butlin
{"title":"Genetic Coupling of Mate Recognition Systems in the Genomic Era.","authors":"Michael G Ritchie, Roger K Butlin","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of \"genetic coupling\" in mate recognition systems arose in the 1960s as a potential mechanism to maintain coordination between signals and receivers during evolutionary divergence. At its most basic it proposed that the same genes might influence trait and preference, and therefore mutations could result in coordinated changes in both traits. Since then, the concept has expanded in scope and is often used to include linkage or genetic correlation between recognition system components. Here we review evidence for genetic coupling, concentrating on proposed examples of a common genetic basis for signals and preferences. Mapping studies have identified several examples of tight genetic linkage between genomic regions influencing signals and preferences, or assortative mating. Whether this extends as far as demonstrating pleiotropy remains a more open question. Some studies, notably of <i>Drosophila</i>, have identified genes in the sex determination pathway and in pheromonal communication where single loci can influence both signals and preferences. This may be based on isoform divergence, in which sex- and tissue-specific effects are facilitated by alternative spicing, or on regulatory divergence. Hence it is not clear that such examples provide compelling evidence of pleiotropy in the sense that \"magic mutations\" could maintain trait coordination. Rather, coevolution may be facilitated by regulatory divergence but require different mutations or coevolution across isoforms. Reconsidering the logic of genetic coupling, it may be that pleiotropy could actually be less effective than linkage if distinct but associated variants allow molecular coevolution to occur more readily than potentially \"unbalanced\" mutations in single genes. Genetic manipulation or studies of mutation order effects during divergence are challenging but perhaps the only way to disentangle the role of pleiotropy versus close linkage in coordinated trait divergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10494,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of "genetic coupling" in mate recognition systems arose in the 1960s as a potential mechanism to maintain coordination between signals and receivers during evolutionary divergence. At its most basic it proposed that the same genes might influence trait and preference, and therefore mutations could result in coordinated changes in both traits. Since then, the concept has expanded in scope and is often used to include linkage or genetic correlation between recognition system components. Here we review evidence for genetic coupling, concentrating on proposed examples of a common genetic basis for signals and preferences. Mapping studies have identified several examples of tight genetic linkage between genomic regions influencing signals and preferences, or assortative mating. Whether this extends as far as demonstrating pleiotropy remains a more open question. Some studies, notably of Drosophila, have identified genes in the sex determination pathway and in pheromonal communication where single loci can influence both signals and preferences. This may be based on isoform divergence, in which sex- and tissue-specific effects are facilitated by alternative spicing, or on regulatory divergence. Hence it is not clear that such examples provide compelling evidence of pleiotropy in the sense that "magic mutations" could maintain trait coordination. Rather, coevolution may be facilitated by regulatory divergence but require different mutations or coevolution across isoforms. Reconsidering the logic of genetic coupling, it may be that pleiotropy could actually be less effective than linkage if distinct but associated variants allow molecular coevolution to occur more readily than potentially "unbalanced" mutations in single genes. Genetic manipulation or studies of mutation order effects during divergence are challenging but perhaps the only way to disentangle the role of pleiotropy versus close linkage in coordinated trait divergence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因组时代配偶识别系统的遗传耦合。
配偶识别系统中的 "基因耦合 "概念产生于 20 世纪 60 年代,是一种在进化分化过程中保持信号和接收器之间协调的潜在机制。最基本的概念是,相同的基因可能会影响性状和偏好,因此突变可能会导致这两种性状的协调变化。从那时起,这一概念的范围不断扩大,经常被用于识别系统各组成部分之间的联系或遗传相关性。在此,我们回顾了遗传耦合的证据,并集中讨论了信号和偏好具有共同遗传基础的实例。图谱研究发现了几个影响信号和偏好或同种交配的基因组区域之间存在紧密遗传联系的例子。至于这种联系是否会扩展到显示多效性,这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。一些研究,特别是对果蝇的研究,发现在性别决定途径和信息素交流中,单个基因位点可以同时影响信号和偏好。这可能是基于异构体的分化,在这种分化中,性别和组织特异性效应通过替代性加糖而得到促进,也可能是基于调控分化。因此,从 "神奇的突变 "可以维持性状协调的意义上来说,这些例子并没有提供令人信服的多效性证据。相反,共同进化可能是由调控分歧促进的,但需要不同的突变或不同同工酶的共同进化。重新考虑遗传耦合的逻辑,如果不同但相关的变异比单个基因中潜在的 "不平衡 "突变更容易使分子共同进化发生,那么多效性实际上可能不如关联性有效。遗传操作或对分化过程中突变顺序效应的研究具有挑战性,但也许是区分多效性与紧密连锁在协调性状分化中的作用的唯一方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology offers a comprehensive platform in the molecular life sciences, featuring reviews that span molecular, cell, and developmental biology, genetics, neuroscience, immunology, cancer biology, and molecular pathology. This online publication provides in-depth insights into various topics, making it a valuable resource for those engaged in diverse aspects of biological research.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms of Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres. Rediscovering and Unrediscovering Gregor Mendel: His Life, Times, and Intellectual Context. Teaching School Genetics in the 2020s: Why "Naive" Mendelian Genetics Has to Go. The Role of Microhomology-Mediated End Joining (MMEJ) at Dysfunctional Telomeres. Modeling the Emergence of Circuit Organization and Function during Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1